Suchergebnisse

Village government isn't delivering basic public services: education, health, and social economy. It is just levy tax land, legitimate of letters, and building infrastructure with mutual cooperation as heritage colonial policy, heerendiensten. Base on this problem, the qualitative research conduct in Loireng Village, Sayung Under District, Demak Regency/District, Central Jawa Province. The objective of this research is to analyze why the village government does not deliver basic public services. Data were collected by observation, document study, and interview. Data analyzed with qualitative descriptive. The new public service theory Denhardt and Denhardt used to analyze it. This research found that village government isn't formal government but state corporatism which not formed to deliver citizen public services.

Bagir Manan ( 1994) menyimpulan bahwa model pemerintahan daerah berdasarkan UD 1945 adalah desentalistik. Akan tetapi, kebijakan otonomi daerah sejak kemerdekaan sampai sekarang berbolak-balik arah: dari desentalistik ke sentralistik dan sebaliknya (Hoessein, 1995a). Kebijakan otonomi daerah pertama kali dilakukan oleh pemerintah kolonial Belanda dengan pengundangan Decentralizatiewet 190~ Regulasi awal ini lebih kental sentralistiknya ketimbang desentralistiknya. Pada masa kemerdekaan, melalui U No. 1/ 1945 jo. UU No. 22/ 1948 jo UU No. 1/ 1957 kebijakan otonomi daerah bergeser ke desentralistik. Pa amasa Demokrasi Terpimpin dan Orde Baru kebijakan otonomi daerah berbalik ke sentralistik. Pada masa Reformasi melalui UU No. 22/ 1999 kebijakan otonomi daerah kembali ke desentralistik. Akan tetapi, dengan 1uu No. 32/ 2004 kebijakan otonomi daerah bergeser antara desentralistik dan sentralistik. Melalui UU No. p1 2014 kebijakan otonomi daerah kembali ke sentralistik. Tampak bahwa kebijakan otonomi daerah tidak kpnsisten dari suatu regim ke regim berikutnya. Ketidakkonsistenan tersebut bukan karena perubahan asas p9merintahan daerah dalam UUD 1945 tapi karena respon atas problem implementatif tanpa mendasarkan pada l ilai, filosofi, teori,dan asas otonomi daerah sebagaimana tercantum dalam konstitusi.

Since the 1998 Reform Era, the system of government in Indonesia has changed from centralization to decentralization. Under the decentralization system, some affairs of government are given to the local governments (provincial, regent/municipal), except five affairs: 1) abroad policy; 2) defense and security; 3) monetary and fiscal; 4) management of justice; and 5) religion. One of the decentralized affairs is culture affair. Then local governments regulate (regeling) and administer (bestuur) their autonomy. However, under the local governments, the culture has been reduced be traditional art, traditional fashion, ancient manuscript, museum, and tourism based on traditional customs. In this perspektive, the culture is not seen as a system of values and expressions of thinking, behavior, and artifacts of mankind. Consequently, the cultural policy on has no correlatation with the development of civil society in the local level. Keywords: decentralization policy, culture affair, traditional art, civil society

The status of Village has still been outside of the government bureucratic-system. It is still being positioned as a community that regulated by State and given the governmental tasks. The Law Number 6/ 2014 regarding The Village not includes it into the local government system. This research was conducted in Wilalung Village. The aim of it was to evaluate whether or not the Village in practice has been currently relevant with Article 18 B Verse (2) of Constitution 1945. The Data were collected through several ways: field observation, in-depth interview, focus group discussion, and literature study. This study found that regulation of Village is on the out side bases of the Article 18 B Verse (2).Therefore, the Village-Administration needs to be restructured and into the local government system.