Suchergebnisse

Chapter 1- Passive revolutions and the future of the EU: democratic theorising and the 'decolonial multitude' -- Chapter 2- From a European 'people(s)' to the decolonial multitude: Democratising the EU's political imaginary -- Chapter 3-The political and ideological genealogy of the 'citizen' turn in the EU: The European Citizen Consultations, the citizen dialogues and the antipolitical imaginary -- Chapter 4-Democracy without politics in the Conference on the Future of Europe: The political architecture, process and recommendations -- Chapter 5- The presence of the absence of the EU people(s): Individualised Technodeliberation in the CoFoE European Citizens' Panels -- Chapter 6- The institutional 'success' of the CoFoE via the 'new generation' citizen panels: The European Commission leads the public-private 'citizen turn' -- Chapter 7- "The lost art of organising (transnational) solidarity": Articulating the decolonial multitude in the EU (and beyond) -- Chapter 8-The contrast between the EU's technocratic conception of 'citizen participation' and the democratic pluralism of the decolonial multitude.

This book explores the debate and politicisation of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations in the Spanish, French and British public spheres. It addresses the questions of how and to what extent the national media discourses about TTIP were Europeanised, and how this type of Europeanisation contributes to the democratic legitimacy of the EU. The author argues that the politicisation of TTIP should be seen as a symptom of the "normal" politics of a democratic polity, as it enlarges the political arena by embedding European issues into national political debates. Demands for "Another Europe is Possible" empower rather than hinder the legitimacy of the EU.

Chapter 1: Introduction to the analysis of the pan-European debate surrounding the TTIP negotiations -- Chapter 2: An agonistic approach to the Europeanisation of public spheres: Matching 'policy with politics' -- Chapter 3: A media-centered approach to analyse the politicisation and Europeanisation of TTIP -- Chapter 4: Framing TTIP in Spain -- Chapter 5: Framing TTIP in France -- Chapter 6: Framing TTIP in the UK -- Chapter 7: Framing TTIP across the Spanish, French and British public spheres: Bursting the Brussels bubble -- Chapter 8: The transnational TTIP debate: politicisation empowers further European integration.

Although never conceived as a tool of direct democracy, the European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) raised hopes that it would involve citizens more directly in EU decision making. Previous research has suggested that one contribution of the ECI is its effect on fostering public deliberation on EU issues, raising questions about the ECI's potential as a tool for social movements to generate communicative power in relation to EU issues. This article draws on agonistic and deliberative perspectives to argue that communicative power generation can be seen as a process where ECI organizers use social media to advance specific understandings of their concerns and channel those understandings into mainstream mass media. The article analyses this by investigating how frames constructed on the Stop TTIP campaign's Facebook page have resonated in twelve online news sites in four European countries in the wake of the Greenpeace leaks.

Introduction: Populist Parties, Pluralism and Democratic Systems in Europe -- Varieties of Populism in East-Central Europe: From Democratic Challenge to Illiberal Project -- Explaining Democratic Backsliding in Poland: The Interplay of Party-specific and Contextual Factors -- Anti-pluralist Reactions to an Anti-pluralist Party: The 'Alternative for Germany' and the German Party System -- Making a Wor(l)d of Difference? The National Front's Anti-pluralist Stands and their Evolution Over Time -- Protector of the People or Enemy of Democracy? Vlaams Belang's Anti-pluralist Discourse and Institutional Barriers in the Flemish Political System -- Party System Hospitality, Internal Strife, and Radicalisation: The Evolution of the Partij voor de Vrijheid and the Forum voor Democratie in the Netherlands -- Taming Populist Anti-pluralism? The Effect of Changing Centre-right Strategies on the Austrian Freedom Party -- The Five Star Movement and its Challenge to the Pluralistic Foundations of Italian Democracy -- The Conditioning of Podemos by Mainstream PSOE between 2014 and 2020: From Transformative Populism to Mainstream Centre-left Coalition Partner -- Conclusion: How to Channel Populism in Europe Democratically.

"Populist Parties and Democratic Resilience focuses on populist parties as the main agents of populism and examines when these parties turn anti-democratic and when they remain loyal to the democratic system. Following the Brexit referendum, the election of Donald Trump, and the rise of populist parties around the globe, many observers suggested that democracy was in serious trouble. Nevertheless, while some democratic systems have been seized by populists, most of them have proven resilient. In this volume, the authors identify the conditions under which populist parties become inimical to political and societal pluralism. They offer in-depth analyses of the trajectory of populist parties in eleven European Union countries (Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, Poland, Romania, and Spain). The book shows that, reflecting the diversity of national contexts, there are multiple pathways whereby populist parties' power can remain contained and subject to democratic checks and balances. Moreover, populist parties can - at times voluntarily, at other times by force of external conditions - come to adhere to the democratic rules of the game. On this basis, the volume outlines different ways in which European democracies can successfully accommodate populist parties through strategies that carefully navigate between the extremes of uncritical acceptance and outright ostracization. Drawing on the literature on democratic theory and comparative politics, this book directly contributes to the public debate on the state of democracy in Europe. It will be of interest to researchers of comparative politics, European politics, party politics, democracy, and populism"--

"Populist Parties and Democratic Resilience focuses on populist parties as the main agents of populism and examines when these parties turn anti-democratic and when they remain loyal to the democratic system. Following the Brexit referendum, the election of Donald Trump, and the rise of populist parties around the globe, many observers suggested that democracy was in serious trouble. Nevertheless, while some democratic systems have been seized by populists, most of them have proven resilient. In this volume, the authors identify the conditions under which populist parties become inimical to political and societal pluralism. They offer in-depth analyses of the trajectory of populist parties in eleven European Union countries (Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, Poland, Romania, and Spain). The book shows that, reflecting the diversity of national contexts, there are multiple pathways whereby populist parties' power can remain contained and subject to democratic checks and balances. Moreover, populist parties can - at times voluntarily, at other times by force of external conditions - come to adhere to the democratic rules of the game. On this basis, the volume outlines different ways in which European democracies can successfully accommodate populist parties through strategies that carefully navigate between the extremes of uncritical acceptance and outright ostracization. Drawing on the literature on democratic theory and comparative politics, this book directly contributes to the public debate on the state of democracy in Europe. It will be of interest to researchers of comparative politics, European politics, party politics, democracy, and populism"--

AbstractThe debate on EU responses to democratic backsliding in EU member states has mostly been anchored on technocratic appeals to the rule of law and judicial independence, and on Poland and Hungary. In this article, we ask: What understandings of democracy have shaped the European Commission's response to democratic backsliding in recent years? After developing an understanding of pluralist democracy, we uncover the way in which the European Commission conceives of democracy through a discourse analysis of European Commissioners' speeches (2018–21) and a normative‐theoretical analysis. We identify the Commission's conception as a form of 'democracy without politics', and argue that it matches the EU's policy choices in regard to democratic backsliding. We argue that a fuller, healthier and normatively more attractive conception of democracy encompasses more attention to political pluralism, agonistic contestation and the vibrancy of civil society.

AbstractResearch on national parliaments in the EU has greatly expanded since the Treaty of Lisbon fully recognized their role in providing democratic legitimacy for EU decision‐making. However, the direct interaction between national parliaments and the European Commission has received little academic attention. This research note seeks to frame a research agenda that explores whether, and under which conditions, the Commission visits to national parliaments have the potential to develop from sites for inter‐institutional exchange of information to arenas for cross‐level accountability. We lay out a framework to capture the relation between national parliaments and the Commission based on three kinds of indicators: the formal set‐up, logic of interaction, and public communication. We illustrate the kind of evidence and range of variation that this agenda may unearth by applying this framework in an exploratory analysis of Trade Commissioner Malmström's visits to seven national parliaments in the EU.

As the politicization of European integration is channeled through the media, it fundamentally implies a discursive power distribution between actors and institutions based on who and what type of argument is promoted. Scholars have started to hypothesize who will benefit from this expansion of debates to wider publics, predominantly using media logics to conclude with the notion of 'discursive intergovernmentalism': where media spotlights enter, executives benefit. In this paper, we contribute to these nascent studies into the discursive empowerment of actors and institutions, by adding a critical notion. Taking our cue from Critical Discourse Analysis, we argue that media output should not only be theorized based on news values, but equally by accounting for existing institutional power (im)balances. To evaluate this argument, we draw on new intergovernmentalist theory, and empirically delve into the Spanish and Dutch media coverage of the (run-up to the) July 2020 NextGenerationEU recovery package.