Suchergebnisse

Although the terrorist-war experience of the years since 2001 lead to conclusions that the last years negatively affected world peace, the Paris terror attacks of 2015 transformed peace into bad peace. Global terrorism is a form of expression of some form of evil, but not its explanation. The first victim of terror, as of war, is truth. The absolute power is in the hand of all justifying lie which is also influencing the absurd "shame of condemnation" of war in itself. That lie also permits the democracies to ignore the reflections on war. What is the role of the people who try to approach the world of violence with reflection? Intellectuals are expected to provide answers; the main function of thinking is bringing up the stories with the aim, according to the writer Terziani, of sharing wisdom and re-establishing the conscious.

Political systems of various states are currently described as the rule of law states, lawabiding states, democratic states ruled by law, lawful states, or law-governed states?Mostly, it is noticed that the states ruled by law are characterized by the fact that thepower is exercised by the set of abstract principles which govern the conduct of all people(a general norm) by equal rules, in opposition to the state governed by people (the orderof an individual or group of individuals). Such a state acts on the basis of law and withinits limits. The above statement corresponds with the apprehension of the law-abidingstate. The law observing state is formally characterized by functioning on the basis of,and within the limits of law whereas its substantial dimension means that the law is equal(equal for everyone). This description is not sufficient to characterize the rule of the lawstate. It is only a fragment of even broader concept of the democratic state ruled by law.

Political systems of various states are currently described as the rule of law states, lawabiding states, democratic states ruled by law, lawful states, or law-governed states? Mostly, it is noticed that the states ruled by law are characterized by the fact that the power is exercised by the set of abstract principles which govern the conduct of all people (a general norm) by equal rules, in opposition to the state governed by people (the order of an individual or group of individuals). Such a state acts on the basis of law and within its limits. The above statement corresponds with the apprehension of the law-abiding state. The law observing state is formally characterized by functioning on the basis of, and within the limits of law whereas its substantial dimension means that the law is equal (equal for everyone). This description is not sufficient to characterize the rule of the law state. It is only a fragment of even broader concept of the democratic state ruled by law. ; Współcześnie ustroje wielu państw są opisywane jako ustroje państw prawnych, praworządnych czy demokratycznych państw prawnych. Zwykle zauważa się, że cechą państwa prawnego, inaczej niż w wypadku państwa rządzonego przez ludzi (np. rozkaz jednostki), jest to, że władzę sprawuje system abstrakcyjnych reguł, które kierują postępowaniem wszystkich ludzi (generalna norma) na jednakowych zasadach. Takie państwo działa na podstawie i w granicach prawa. Powyższe stwierdzenie odpowiada w zasadzie pojmowaniu państwa praworządnego. Państwo praworządne formalnie cechuje bowiem działanie na podstawie i w granicach prawa, zaś jego wymiar materialny oznacza, że prawo jest jednakowe (równe) dla wszystkich. Opis ten nie wystarczy dla scharakteryzowania państwa prawnego. Jest więc też tylko fragmentem opisu jeszcze szerszej koncepcji, jaką jest demokratyczne państwo prawne.

Political systems of various states are currently described as the rule of law states, lawabiding states, democratic states ruled by law, lawful states, or law-governed states? Mostly, it is noticed that the states ruled by law are characterized by the fact that the power is exercised by the set of abstract principles which govern the conduct of all people (a general norm) by equal rules, in opposition to the state governed by people (the order of an individual or group of individuals). Such a state acts on the basis of law and within its limits. The above statement corresponds with the apprehension of the law-abiding state. The law observing state is formally characterized by functioning on the basis of, and within the limits of law whereas its substantial dimension means that the law is equal (equal for everyone). This description is not sufficient to characterize the rule of the law state. It is only a fragment of even broader concept of the democratic state ruled by law.

W zakresie problematyki tworzenia prawa znajduje się m.in. sprawa techniki budowy tekstu aktu normatywnego, np. ustawy. Konstruowanie tekstu aktu normatywnego oznacza w tym wypadku zorganizowanie czy zakodowanie treści pewnej reguły w konwencjonalnie zaprojektowaną formę pisemną. Tworzenie aktów normatywnych zbliżone jest do pisania dzieła literackiego o szczególnym charakterze, tj. takiego, które ma wpływać na postępowanie ludzi. Wspomniana konwencjonalność budowy aktu i znajomość sposobu kodowania umożliwia następnie – ilekroć to będzie konieczne – wydobycie z tej struktury przepisów zawartej w nich normy. Wiedza legislacyjna, o której tu mowa, dotyczy elementów tekstu aktu normatywnego, a zwłaszcza przepisów o różnym charakterze, dyrektyw konstruowania aktu normatywnego, redagowania jego przepisów, systematyki (struktury) tekstu, a także zasad zmieniania, ujednolicania i tzw. uelastyczniania tekstu aktu normatywnego. Rozwój techniki legislacyjnej i stała dbałość o utrzymanie wysokiego jej poziomu w praktyce prawotwórczej ma ogromne znaczenie dla pewności prawa i zaufania obywateli do państwa.

There is no law making without law writing. Creating an act of law means organizing (coding) a rule into a strictly designed form. That form and the knowledge of coding allows a reader to extract rules from statues. The knowledge necessary for law writing includes but is not limited to the following elements of acts of law: statues, directives, editing, text structure, rules for amending and unifying etc. Development of legislative techniques and quality control in law writing are necessary to provide high quality law that citizens can trust.

Evaluation of the present human attitude towards world and society seems to be similar to the fears caused by the destruction of earlier visions of permanent and meaningful world that have taken place during Enlightenment. The visions of real dangers are accompanied by reflections on conditions of survival. At the same time the hope put on the ideology of self-regulating neoliberal market is fading and is being treated as a sort of masquerade. New thinking, "post-postmodern", takes on the question how it should be so the World is preserved. And so emerges the awareness of the necessity of projects which will propose a future more stable compared to the postmodern model of maximum, cheap, accidental and current consumption, bureaucratic practice of neo-competition and a postpolitcs of small contemporary reactions manipulated by media hype. Post-postmodernity emerges today as minimalistic idea about fixing the most important faults of today according to the convention and ethics navigating according to the reason that is rooted in science.