The roles of community seed banks in climate change adaption
In: Development in practice, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 316-327
ISSN: 1364-9213
12 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Development in practice, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 316-327
ISSN: 1364-9213
A growing body of research suggests female- and male-headed households in low- and middle-income countries differ in terms of crop choices, access to resources for growing different crops, and values placed on crops for home consumption versus market sale. To better understand relationships between gender of the household head, household resources, individual values, and crop choices, we draw on original survey data collected from 1,001 rural households in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. Bivariate and multivariate analyses suggest that female-headed households are less likely to grow cash crops, reflecting a combination of resource constraints and social norms. However, on average, female-headed households plant more diverse food crops per hectare of land to which they have access, consistent with past findings suggesting crop diversity is a strategy employed by resource-constrained female-headed households to meet household food security needs. We also find that women surveyed on behalf of their households place a higher value on crops for food security, while men more frequently emphasize income potential. These results provide novel cross-country evidence on how female- and male-headed households, and women and men farmers within households, may prefer different crops and also face different levels of access to resources needed for market-oriented agriculture. Such findings support recent calls for development practitioners to carefully consider how market-oriented programs and policies may differentially affect female- and male-headed households and individuals residing within them. We also underscore the importance of collecting gender-disaggregated data to capture meaningful differences in preferences and constraints across women and men at the inter- and intra-household level. ; International Treaty for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture ; European Union ; Peer Review
BASE
The Rubaya community gene bank, located in the Rubaya sector of Gicumbi district in Northern Rwanda, is managed by the Kundisuka cooperative. It originated when a farmer by the name of Mpoberabanzi Silas and an agronomist working in the Rubaya sector recognized the need to preserve some of the genetic resources in the area that were being lost (e.g. several varieties of beans, peas, maize, wheat and sorghum). Implementation of the project was supported by the staff of the Rwanda Agriculture Board (RAB) in cooperation with Bioversity International (Plate 18). The managing cooperative was created in September 2012 and consists of about ten members with Mpoberabanzi Silas as president. The community gene bank's storage facilities were constructed locally with support from Vision 2020's Umurenge Program and the Ministry of Local Government. Their main purpose is to store the region's priority crops (maize, wheat, beans and Irish potatoes), but farmers are free to use the facilities to store and conserve other seeds and planting material. The community gene bank does not yet have a visible role in the community, for example, in seed production or participatory crop improvement, as it is still in its early stages. However, its members' vision is to invest in seed multiplication to make good-quality seeds available to the local community and regional gene banks. This will transform the enterprise into a business-oriented farmer cooperative certified by RAB.
BASE
The report gives a summary of a policy workshop that was held in December 2019 to discuss the complex issues related to access to and use of genetic resources for climate change adaptation. In particular, the workshop focussed on policies to support the further use in research and breeding, or possible 'direct use in cultivation' of materials that performed well in participatory trials supported by these projects. The workshop brought together practitioners from Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda from various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and advocacy groups, policy makers from government departments, seed inspection and certification services and researchers and breeders.
BASE
International audience ; Application of the open source concept to seeds has a promising future. It reverses the logic of the intellectual property system with a renewable stock of open source material kept outside the exclusive intellectual property realm. Legal defensibility may currently be uncertain, but as open source builds a critical mass of practitioners and supporters, wider social legitimacy could strengthen the legal power. Future extension to other subject matter and settings is discussed on the basis of lessons learnt from current open source seed implementation experience in the US, Europe and Africa.
BASE
International audience ; Le concept d'open source appliqué aux semences végétales a un avenir prometteur. Ce concept inverse la logique du système de propriété intellectuelle pour une ressource renouvelable que l'on rend disponible en la sortant du domaine exclusif de la propriété intellectuelle. Aujourd'hui, les instruments juridiques font encore défaut pour établir un cadre légal complet. Toutefois, le concept d'open source, que l'on pourrait traduire ici par licence libre et ouverte, engendre au fil du temps une masse critique d'utilisateurs et de soutiens qui entraîne une légitimité sociale grandissante. À terme, cette légitimité pourrait renforcer le pouvoir juridique. L'extension future à d'autres matériels dans différents contextes doit être réfléchie en s'appuyant sur les expériences actuelles de semences sous licences libres et ouvertes conduites aux États-Unis, en Europe et en Afrique.
BASE
International audience ; Application of the open source concept to seeds has a promising future. It reverses the logic of the intellectual property system with a renewable stock of open source material kept outside the exclusive intellectual property realm. Legal defensibility may currently be uncertain, but as open source builds a critical mass of practitioners and supporters, wider social legitimacy could strengthen the legal power. Future extension to other subject matter and settings is discussed on the basis of lessons learnt from current open source seed implementation experience in the US, Europe and Africa.
BASE
International audience ; Le concept d'open source appliqué aux semences végétales a un avenir prometteur. Ce concept inverse la logique du système de propriété intellectuelle pour une ressource renouvelable que l'on rend disponible en la sortant du domaine exclusif de la propriété intellectuelle. Aujourd'hui, les instruments juridiques font encore défaut pour établir un cadre légal complet. Toutefois, le concept d'open source, que l'on pourrait traduire ici par licence libre et ouverte, engendre au fil du temps une masse critique d'utilisateurs et de soutiens qui entraîne une légitimité sociale grandissante. À terme, cette légitimité pourrait renforcer le pouvoir juridique. L'extension future à d'autres matériels dans différents contextes doit être réfléchie en s'appuyant sur les expériences actuelles de semences sous licences libres et ouvertes conduites aux États-Unis, en Europe et en Afrique.
BASE
International audience ; Application of the open source concept to seeds has a promising future. It reverses the logic of the intellectual property system with a renewable stock of open source material kept outside the exclusive intellectual property realm. Legal defensibility may currently be uncertain, but as open source builds a critical mass of practitioners and supporters, wider social legitimacy could strengthen the legal power. Future extension to other subject matter and settings is discussed on the basis of lessons learnt from current open source seed implementation experience in the US, Europe and Africa.
BASE
Over the last few decades, there has been a growing appreciation of crop varieties developed by local farmers, commonly referred to as farmers' varieties. These varieties often have attractive characteristics for both producers and consumers, such as adaptability to harsh environmental conditions and high nutritional values. Yet they are usually not sold in formal markets, and tend to be limited to farmers' seed systems. This is partially due to national seed laws that, in an effort to guarantee good quality seed of uniform and stable varieties, create obstacles for farmers' varieties to reach the market. This article describes the experiences of four countries—Bolivia, Laos, Nepal and Zimbabwe—that are developing alternative variety registration systems for farmers' varieties. Most of these cases have never been documented before. The cases present the main drivers behind and approaches to the registration of farmers' varieties in different legal contexts and at different stages of development. We conclude that farmers' variety registration systems can generate benefits including faster and cheaper variety releases, improved farmer incomes, and a larger diversity of well-adapted varieties in the market—but some important issues are still to be resolved.
BASE
Crop genetic resources constitute a 'new' global commons, characterized by multiple layers of activities of farmers, genebanks, public and private research and development organizations, and regulatory agencies operating from local to global levels. This paper presents sui generis biocultural community protocols that were developed by four communities in Benin and Madagascar to improve their ability to contribute to, and benefit from, the crop commons. The communities were motivated in part by the fact that their national governments' had recently ratified the Plant Treaty and the Nagoya Protocol, which make commitments to promoting the rights of indigenous peoples, local communities and farmers, without being prescriptive as to how Contracting Parties should implement those commitments. The communities identified the protocols as useful means to advance their interests and/or rights under both the Plant Treaty and the Nagoya Protocol to be recognized as managers of local socio-ecological systems, to access genetic resources from outside the communities, and to control others' access to resources managed by the community.
BASE
This 26th dossier d'Agropolis is devoted to research and partnerships in agroecology. The French Commission for International Agricultural Research (CRAI) and Agropolis International, on behalf of CIRAD, INRAE and IRD and in partnership with CGIAR, has produced this new issue in the 'Les dossiers d'Agropolis international' series devoted to agroecology. This publication has been produced within the framework of the Action Plan signed by CGIAR and the French government on February 4th 2021 to strengthen French collaboration with CGIAR, where agroecology is highlighted as one of the three key priorities (alongside climate change, nutrition and food systems).
BASE