Suchergebnisse

This paper aims at analysing the policy and legal framework of joint study programmes in Eastern Partnership countries (EaP countries) in frames of the standards of the European Higher Education Area and providing the recommendations on its enhancement. It is concluded that the internationalization of higher education has been considered as one of the critical priorities of the educational policy in EaP countries. However, more emphasis on the role of joint study programmes is needed. The level of specification of legislative requirements on joint study programmes in EaP countries differs. The educational laws in Georgia, Moldova include special provisions devoted to joint study programmes, in Ukraine – basic framework, including the possibility to establish joint study programmes and awarding the joint degrees, while respective legislation in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Belarus – just general provisions regarding the international cooperation of higher educational institutions. It is suggested to implement the European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes in national laws and regulations in EaP countries, first of all, in part of the definition of joint study programmes and the recognition of the accreditation decisions of foreign quality assurance agencies. ; Straipsnyje siekiama išanalizuoti Rytų partnerystės valstybių jungtinių studijų programų politinę ir teisinę sistemą, atsižvelgiant į Europos aukštojo mokslo erdvės standartus bei pateikiant rekomendacijas dėl jos tobulinimo. Straipsnyje daroma išvada, kad aukštojo mokslo tarptautinimas laikytinas vienu iš didžiausių prioritetų Rytų partnerystės švietimo politikoje, tačiau būtina daryti didesnį akcentą jungtinių studijų programų vaidmeniui. Rytų partnerystės šalyse teisiniai reikalavimai jungtinėms studijų programoms skiriasi. Į Gruzijos, Moldovos švietimo įstatymus yra įtrauktos specialios nuostatos, skirtos jungtinėms studijų programoms, Ukrainos švietimo teisiniame reglamentavime yra nuostatų, susijusių su galimybe sudaryti jungtines studijų programas ir suteikti jungtinius kvalifikacijos laipsnius, Armėnijos, Azerbaidžano ir Baltarusijos įstatymuose reglamentuojamos tik bendrosios nuostatos dėl tarptautinio aukštųjų mokyklų bendradarbiavimo. Siūloma, kad Rytų partnerystės valstybių nacionaliniais įstatymais ir kitais teisės aktais būtų įgyvendintas Europos požiūris į jungtinių programų kokybės užtikrinimą, pirmiausia iš dalies apibrėžiant jungtines studijų programas ir pripažįstant užsienio kokybės užtikrinimo agentūrų akreditavimo sprendimus.

This paper aims at analysing the policy and legal framework of joint study programmes in Eastern Partnership countries (EaP countries) in frames of the standards of the European Higher Education Area and providing the recommendations on its enhancement. It is concluded that the internationalization of higher education has been considered as one of the key priorities of the educational policy in EaP countries, however, more emphasis on the role of the joint study programmes is needed. The level of specification of legislative requirements on joint study programmes in EaP countries differs. The educational laws in Georgia, Moldova include special provisions devoted to joint study programmes, in Ukraine – basic framework, including the possibility to establish joint study programmes and awarding the joint degrees, while respective legislation in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Belarus – just general provisions regarding the international cooperation of higher educational institutions. It is suggested to implement the European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes in national laws and regulations in EaP countries, first of all, in part of the definition of joint study programmes and the recognition of the accreditation decisions of foreign quality assurance agencies.

This paper aims at analysing the policy and legal framework of joint study programmes in Eastern Partnership countries (EaP countries) in frames of the standards of the European Higher Education Area and providing the recommendations on its enhancement. It is concluded that the internationalization of higher education has been considered as one of the key priorities of the educational policy in EaP countries, however, more emphasis on the role of the joint study programmes is needed. The level of specification of legislative requirements on joint study programmes in EaP countries differs. The educational laws in Georgia, Moldova include special provisions devoted to joint study programmes, in Ukraine – basic framework, including the possibility to establish joint study programmes and awarding the joint degrees, while respective legislation in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Belarus – just general provisions regarding the international cooperation of higher educational institutions. It is suggested to implement the European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes in national laws and regulations in EaP countries, first of all, in part of the definition of joint study programmes and the recognition of the accreditation decisions of foreign quality assurance agencies.

The objective of the article was to analyze the dialectic of rights and responsibilities in education. The importance of education is so great that the thesis of the responsibility of the person to receive education has now been recognized. In order for the right to education to be exercised, the domestic law of states provides for a set of responsibilities for participants in the educational process, the implementation of which actually guarantees access to education. The real economic opportunities of States have a great impact on the real content of the dialectical process of interaction of rights and responsibilities in the field of education. The relationship between the participants in the educational process is regulated at several levels: first, the rules of domestic law and then the contractual level, represented by the statutes of educational institutions, comes into force. It is concluded that, in the most advanced systems, there may be a level of intra-group agreements that are completely voluntary. The practical content of the educational process is influenced by several factors, including ideology, the objectives set by a given society, the traditions and customs that have developed in it.

The purpose of this article was to scientifically analyze the current trends in the development of civil law in the modern reality, on which follow the authors' proposals to improve its evolution and adaptation. The methodological basis of the study included philosophical approaches, as well as general and special scientific methods of knowledge that meet the main objectives and tasks set in the research. According to the results of the study, civil law today is different not only in the application and protection of rights, compared to the original approaches established by the developers of the current Civil Code and, special sectoral legislation, but also in the change in the paradigm of normative and legal regulation. Everything allows to conclude that, in summary, the authors offer specific recommendations for updating the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine, which I include also proposals for changes in civil law. Definitely, civic reflection on all the issues raised in this study makes it possible to consider the problems from a new point of view and to offer, accordingly, comprehensive options for their solution, taking into account the prominent place of the Civil Code in these processes.