Suchergebnisse

URL del artículo en la web de la Revista: https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/ripp/article/view/3660 ; La alimentación es una actividad cotidiana imprescindible para la vida y cargada de significados que refleja y reproduce las relaciones socioeconómicas y políticas de una sociedad. La materialidad de la alimentación actual en la globalización se construye en el imaginario colectivo dominante a partir de tres sesgos fundamentales de la mirada occidental: el antropocentrismo, el etnocentrismo y androcentrismo propios de la patriarcalidad/ colonialidad del poder/saber/ser. Este trabajo pretende establecer un diálogo crítico entre la agroecología, los feminismos y la teoría decolonial aplicado al análisis del imaginario alimentario hegemónico con el objetivo de pensar, desde una perspectiva crítica-fronteriza, premisas culturales alternativas que contribuyan a la construcción de propuestas alimentarias sostenibles y justas que superen los tres sesgos fundamentales de la mirada occidental (pre)dominante. ; Eating is a daily activity that is both essential to life and loaded with meanings that reflect and reproduce the socioeconomic and political relations within a society. The materiality of food in the globalised world is built, in the dominant collective imagery, on three fundamental biases of the Western view: the anthropocentrism, ethnocentrism and androcentrism constitutive of the patriarchality/coloniality of power/knowledge/being. This work aims at establishing a critical dialogue between agroecology, the feminisms perspective and the decolonial theory on the analysis of hegemonic food imagery with the purpose of thinking, from a critical and borderland teory, alternative cultural premises that cancontribute to the construction of sustainable and fair food proposals capable of overcoming the three fundamental biases of the (pre)dominating Western view. ; Universidad Pablo de Olavide

La alimentación es una actividad cotidiana imprescindible para la vida y cargada de significados que refleja y reproduce las relaciones socioeconómicas y políticas de una sociedad. La materialidad de la alimentación actual en la globalización se construye en el imaginario colectivo dominante a partir de tres sesgos fundamentales de la mirada occidental: el antropocentrismo, el etnocentrismo y androcentrismo propios de la patriarcalidad/ colonialidad del poder/saber/ser. Este trabajo pretende establecer un diálogo crítico entre la agroecología, los feminismos y la teoría decolonial aplicado al análisis del imaginario alimentario hegemónico con el objetivo de pensar, desde una perspectiva crítica-fronteriza, premisas culturales alternativas que contribuyan a la construcción de propuestas alimentarias sostenibles y justas que superen los tres sesgos fundamentales de la mirada occidental (pre)dominante. ; Eating is a daily activity that is both essential to life and loaded with meanings that reflect and reproduce the socioeconomic and political relations within a society. The materiality of food in the globalised world is built, in the dominant collective imagery, on three fundamental biases of the Western view: the anthropocentrism, ethnocentrism and androcentrism constitutive of the patriarchality/coloniality of power/knowledge/being. This work aims at establishing a critical dialogue between agroecology, the feminisms perspective and the decolonial theory on the analysis of hegemonic food imagery with the purpose of thinking, from a critical and borderland teory, alternative cultural premises that cancontribute to the construction of sustainable and fair food proposals capable of overcoming the three fundamental biases of the (pre)dominating Western view.

La alimentación es una actividad cotidiana imprescindible para la vida y cargada de significados que refleja y reproduce las relaciones socioeconómicas y políticas de una sociedad. La materialidad de la alimentación actual en la globalización se construye en el imaginario colectivo dominante a partir de tres sesgos fundamentales de la mirada occidental: el antropocentrismo, el etnocentrismo y androcentrismo propios de la patriarcalidad/colonialidad del poder/saber/ser. Este trabajo pretende establecer un diálogo crítico entre la agroecología, los feminismos y la teoría decolonial aplicado al análisis del imaginario alimentario hegemónico con el objetivo de pensar, desde una perspectiva crítica-fronteriza, premisas culturales alternativas que contribuyan a la construcción de propuestas alimentarias sostenibles y justas que superen los tres sesgos fundamentales de la mirada occidental (pre)dominante. ; Eating is a daily activity that is both essential to life and loaded with meanings that reflect and reproduce the socioeconomic and political relations with in a society. The materiality of food in the globalised world is built, in the dominant collective imagery, on three fundamental biases of the Western view: the anthropocentrism, ethnocentrism and androcentrism constitutive of the patriarchality/coloniality of power/knowledge/being. This work aims at establishing a critical dialogue between agroecology, the feminisms perspective and the decolonial theory on the analysis of hegemonic food imagery with the purpose of thinking, from a critical and borderland teory, alternative cultural premises that cancontribute to the construction of sustainable and fair food proposals capable of overcoming the three fundamental biases of the (pre)dominating Western view.

AbstractThis article addresses sex‐gender relations within the context of changing class relations shaped by the historical formation of an intensive system of agricultural production in Almeria (Spain). The analysis of work, both on the farm and within the domestic unit, guides the research, which relates socio‐historical conditions and the subjective experiences and identities of men and women farmers. We begin from the theoretical premise that the change from being employed as wage laborers to becoming farm owners was a family project in which women and sex‐gender relations played an essential, though hidden, role. We use a qualitative methodology and an historical perspective focused on the different phases of the Almerian agricultural model: the origin and consolidation of the sector (1960–1970), a boom period (the decade of the 1980s) and the strangulation of the model (from the decade of the 2000s until today). The article discusses and concludes that despite the centrality of the participation of women farmers and the change in class position, the subordinate place they occupy—in both the domestic sphere and on the farm– has continued throughout the different phases of the model. Thus, we find that "Some things never change, we're always second in line."