Viewing the Leadership Narrative through Alternate Lenses: An Autoethnographic Investigation
In: Management revue: socio-economic studies, Band 19, Heft 1-2, S. 126-147
ISSN: 1861-9908
18 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Management revue: socio-economic studies, Band 19, Heft 1-2, S. 126-147
ISSN: 1861-9908
In: The leadership quarterly: an international journal of political, social and behavioral science, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 85-105
In: The leadership quarterly: an international journal of political, social and behavioral science, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 132-151
In: The leadership quarterly: an international journal of political, social and behavioral science, Band 20, Heft 4, S. 535-553
In: Culture and organization: the official journal of SCOS, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 185-190
ISSN: 1477-2760
In: The leadership quarterly: an international journal of political, social and behavioral science, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 106-120
In: The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies, S. 446-468
In: Routledge studies in leadership research
In: Leadership horizons series v. 1
In: Leadership horizons series, v. 1
In: Group & organization management: an international journal, Band 41, Heft 5, S. 571-594
ISSN: 1552-3993
Machines are increasingly becoming a substitute for human skills and intelligence in a number of fields where decisions that are crucial to group performance have to be taken under stringent constraints—for example, when an army contingent has to devise battlefield tactics or when a medical team has to diagnose and treat a life-threatening condition or illness. We hypothesize a scenario where similar machine-based intelligent technology is available to support, and even substitute human decision making in an organizational leadership context. We do not engage in any metaphysical debate on the plausibility of such a scenario. Rather, we contend that given what we observe in several other fields of human decision making, such a scenario may very well eventuate in the near future. We argue a number of "positives" that can be expected to emerge out of automated group and organizational leadership decision making. We also posit several anti-theses—"negatives" that can also potentially emerge from the hypothesized scenario and critically consider their implications. We aim to bring leadership and organization theorists, as well as researchers in machine intelligence, together at the discussion table for the first time and postulate that while leadership decision making in a group/organizational context could be effectively delegated to an artificial-intelligence (AI)-based decision system, this would need to be subject to the devising of crucial safeguarding conditions.
In: The leadership quarterly: an international journal of political, social and behavioral science, Band 15, Heft 5, S. 719
In: The leadership quarterly: an international journal of political, social and behavioral science, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 467-491
In: Labour & industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 79-102
ISSN: 2325-5676
In: International Journal of Conflict Management, Band 28, Heft 5, S. 617-643
Purpose
Little research has focused on the impact of organizational crisis on their internal stakeholders – the employees. This paper aims to fill this void by examining the impression management strategies used by senior managers in managing their employees during organizational crisis and the impact of these strategies on employees.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors collected qualitative data from three organizations and used multiple analytical lenses (such as thematic, content and trope) to explore patterns in senior managers' management of employees during crisis.
Findings
Emerging patterns in the data revealed that the emotional state and reactions of employees (individual and collective) during crisis include anger, fear, shame, depression and shock. Additionally, data revealed two major contradictions (tensions) in managing employees during crisis: maintaining and compromising standard and managers' wants versus employees' desire in the way organization crisis is managed. Based on these preliminary findings and using affective event theory and the theory of collective emotions as a frame, the authors built a conceptual model that depicts the relationship between organizational crisis, impression management and emotion-driven employee attitudes and behaviors.
Research limitations/implications
A major limitation in the current research is that authors' data are largely composed of text (e.g. from newspaper and websites). Nevertheless, the textual data were based on actual interviews with stakeholders and victims and have more than compensated for the limitation. Theoretically, by examining the emotional states and reactions of internal (rather than external) stakeholders to organizational crisis, the authors extend the literature in the area of organizational crisis and crisis management, while the testable propositions in this conceptual model have a potential to open up new pathways for studying organizational crisis. Practically, it is imperative for managers to have skills to identify and manage key employees' emotional states and reactions to crisis. Managers should align their words and actions during crisis management to increase employees trust. Also pre-crisis planning should include specific guidelines on how to identify and manage employees' individual and collective emotions during crisis.
Practical implications
The results show that inappropriate impression management strategies may worsen employees' emotional states and reactions (individual and collective) during crisis; therefore, it is imperative for managers to have skills in identifying key employees' emotional states and reactions to crisis and the impression management strategies appropriate in managing them. A training that sharpens managers' emotional intelligence will be helpful in managing the emotions of employees (individual and collective) during crisis. Also, pre-crisis planning should include specific guidelines on how to identify and manage employees' individual and collective emotions during crisis, while senior managers' words and actions during crisis need to be synchronized to engender employees' trust.
Originality/value
This study demonstrates that beyond emotions of employees during crisis, there are contradictions and tensions in the senior manager's management of their employees during crisis. Also, outcomes of a quantitative test of the conceptual model developed from the current study should improve the generalizability of the results and open up new pathways for future research in this area.