Greg D. Kubiak, The Gilded Dome: The U.S. Senate and Campaign Finance Reform
In: Presidential studies quarterly, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 337
ISSN: 0360-4918
5 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Presidential studies quarterly, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 337
ISSN: 0360-4918
In: Presidential studies quarterly, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 139-152
ISSN: 0360-4918
In: Public personnel management, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 139-147
ISSN: 1945-7421
Affirmative action was originally meant to remove by law, as required by the Equal Pay Act and the 1964 Civil Rights Act, "artificial barriers" that often prevented women and minority groups from entering the workforce. By the late 1960's and early 1970's affirmative action had been altered to become the governmental attempt to provide compensatory opportunities for groups who experience discrimination when seeking employment. More recently the legal essence of affirmative action refers to specific guidelines and rules to recruit, hire, and promote disadvantaged groups for the purpose of eliminating the existing effects of past discriminatory practices. Despite a plethora of U.S. Supreme Court decisions, affirmative action has yet to be clearly defined as a cohesive public policy. The Court's failure to define affirmative action as a coherent constitutional and legal concept has led to widespread misinterpretation of affirmative action goals among public administrators. This notion is substantiated by examining the results of a survey of local government officials at the county and municipal level which measures their understanding and perception of federal law pertaining to affirmative action's meaning and purpose.
In: Public personnel management, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 139-148
ISSN: 0091-0260
In: Public personnel management, Band 24, S. 139-147
ISSN: 0091-0260