Suchergebnisse

Alcohol screening; Brief intervention; Referral to electronic brief advice ; Detección de alcohol; Intervención breve; Remisión a asesoramiento breve electrónico ; Detecció d'alcoholèmia; Intervenció breu; Derivació a assessorament breu electrònic ; Objectives: The objective of the present study was toexplore whether the possibility of offering facilitatedaccess to an alcohol electronic brief intervention (eBI) instead of delivering brief face-to-face advice increasedthe proportion of consulting adults who were screenedand given brief advice. Design: The study was a 12-week implementationstudy. Sixty primary healthcare units (PHCUs) in 5 jurisdictions (Catalonia, England, the Netherlands,Poland and Sweden) were asked to screen adults whoattended the PHCU for risky drinking. Setting: A total of 120 primary healthcare centresfrom 5 jurisdictions in Europe. Participants: 746 individual providers (generalpractitioners, nurses or other professionals)participated in the study. Primary outcome: Change in the proportion ofpatients screened and referred to eBI comparing abaseline 4-week preimplementation period with a12-week implementation period. Results: The possibility of referring patients to the eBIwas not found to be associated with any increase in theproportion of patients screened. However, it wasassociated with an increase in the proportion of screen-positive patients receiving brief advice from 70% to 80% for the screen-positive sample as a whole(p<0.05), mainly driven by a significant increase in briefintervention rates in England from 87% to 96%(p<0.01). The study indicated that staff displayed a lowlevel of engagement in this new technology. Staffcontinued to offer face-to-face advice to a largerproportion of patients (54%) than referral to eBI (38%). In addition, low engagement was seen among thereferred patients; on average, 18% of the patientslogged on to the website with a mean log-on rate acrossthe different countries between 0.58% and 36.95%. Conclusions: Referral to eBI takes nearly as muchtime as brief oral advice and might require moreintroduction and training before staff are comfortablewith referring to eBI ; The research leading to these results or outcomes has receivedfunding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme forResearch, Technological Development and Demonstration under grantagreement no. 259268—Optimizing Delivery of Health Care Interventions(ODHIN).

Introduction: People with substance use disorder (SUD) may be at increased risk of COVID-19 infection. However, there is little evidence regarding the incidence of and determinants associated with infection in this group. The aims of the study were to determine the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 among people who sought treatment for heroin, cocaine, cannabis, and alcohol use disorder in Catalonia; to identify sociodemographic, substance, and clinical determinants associated with COVID-19 infection among SUD patients; and to compare the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 infection in the population with SUD with that of the general population. Methods: A patient-based retrospective observational study was conducted. The study population comprised people who sought treatment for heroin, cocaine, cannabis, or alcohol use disorder in Catalonia in 2018 and 2019. We analysed cumulative incidence of COVID-19 (confirmed by PCR test) from 25 February to 31 December 2020. Additionally, we used a log-link binomial generalized linear model for COVID-19 infection, using the substance as the exposition, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables. Results: Of the 23,092 individuals who sought treatment for SUD, 38.15% were considered suspected cases of COVID-19, and 2.60% (95% CI = 2.41–2.82) were confirmed positive for COVID-19 by PCR test during the study period. Those who sought treatment for alcohol use (cumulative incidence of COVID-19 of 3% [95% CI = 2.70–3.34]) had a higher risk ratio than, those who sought treatment for heroin use (cumulative incidence of 1.94% [95% CI = 1.47–2.56]). Being born outside of Spain, living in an institutionalized residence, having HIV, and being in a high morbidity group were associated with higher risk of COVID-19 infection. Meanwhile, the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 in the general population, according to public COVID-19 test data, was 3.86% (95% CI = 3.85–3.87). Conclusion: This study did not find higher cumulative incidence of COVID-19 infection among people with SUD in Catalonia in 2020, despite the clinical vulnerability of this population and their social disadvantage. However, differences were seen in the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 according to the substance for which treatment was sought. For example, those with alcohol dependence had a higher rate than those dependent on heroin. Further studies are needed to determine the factors contributing to these differences.

Brief interventions; Risky drinking; Primary healthcare ; Intervenciones breves; Bebedores de riesgo; Atención primaria ; Intervencions breus; Bevedors de risc; Atenció primària ; Background: Brief interventions in primary healthcare are cost-effective in reducing drinking problems but poorly implemented in routine practice. Although evidence about implementing brief interventions is growing, knowledge is limited with regard to impact of initial role security and therapeutic commitment on brief intervention implementation. Methods: In a cluster randomised factorial trial, 120 primary healthcare units (PHCUs) were randomised to eight groups: care as usual, training and support, financial reimbursement, and the opportunity to refer patients to an internet-based brief intervention (e-BI); paired combinations of these three strategies, and all three strategies combined. To explore the impact of initial role security and therapeutic commitment on implementing brief interventions, we performed multilevel linear regression analyses adapted to the factorial design. Results: Data from 746 providers from 120 PHCUs were included in the analyses. Baseline role security and therapeutic commitment were found not to influence implementation of brief interventions. Furthermore, there were no significant interactions between these characteristics and allocated implementation groups. Conclusions: The extent to which providers changed their brief intervention delivery following experience of different implementation strategies was not determined by their initial attitudes towards alcohol problems. In future research, more attention is needed to unravel the causal relation between practitioners' attitudes, their actual behaviour and care improvement strategies to enhance implementation science. ; The research leading to these results or outcomes has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 259268 – Optimizing delivery of healthcare intervention (ODHIN).

Background: Brief interventions in primary healthcare are cost-effective in reducing drinking problems but poorly implemented in routine practice. Although evidence about implementing brief interventions is growing, knowledge is limited with regard to impact of initial role security and therapeutic commitment on brief intervention implementation. Methods: In a cluster randomised factorial trial, 120 primary healthcare units (PHCUs) were randomised to eight groups: care as usual, training and support, financial reimbursement, and the opportunity to refer patients to an internet-based brief intervention (e-BI); paired combinations of these three strategies, and all three strategies combined. To explore the impact of initial role security and therapeutic commitment on implementing brief interventions, we performed multilevel linear regression analyses adapted to the factorial design. Results: Data from 746 providers from 120 PHCUs were included in the analyses. Baseline role security and therapeutic commitment were found not to influence implementation of brief interventions. Furthermore, there were no significant interactions between these characteristics and allocated implementation groups. Conclusions: The extent to which providers changed their brief intervention delivery following experience of different implementation strategies was not determined by their initial attitudes towards alcohol problems. In future research, more attention is needed to unravel the causal relation between practitioners attitudes, their actual behaviour and care improvement strategies to enhance implementation science. ; Funding Agencies|European Union [259268]; Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW, Prevention Program) [200310017]; Polish science financial resources - project ODHIN [2304/7.PR-COOPERATION/11/2012/2]; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust; Kings College London; NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust