Does the Chief Justice Make Partisan Appointments to Special Courts and Panels?
In: Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 153-177
27 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 153-177
SSRN
In: APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: British journal of political science, Band 52, Heft 4, S. 1902-1910
ISSN: 1469-2112
Allocating resources is a central function of government, and the distributive politics literature provides considerable evidence of leaders around the world directing resources to co-partisan voters and officials. In the United States, studies of 'presidential particularism' have recently demonstrated strategic targeting by the federal executive branch. This letter extends the inquiry to states using an unusually rich case in which all governors simultaneously faced decisions about allocating a constrained resource – tax advantaged status for economic development – from an exogenously generated list of geographic possibilities. This study tests whether governors rewarded their supporters' and allies' areas alongside two alternatives: (1) spreading the wealth by geographic subunits and (2) policy need. It finds no evidence of gubernatorial particularism. Instead, Republicans and Democratic governors prioritized allocating opportunity zones geographically and made efforts to designate at least one in each county. They were also responsive to policy need.
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 81, Heft 2, S. 670-675
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 78, Heft 1, S. 181-196
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 78, Heft 1, S. 181-196
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: Journal of historical political economy: JHPE, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 499-530
ISSN: 2693-9304
In: Political analysis: PA ; the official journal of the Society for Political Methodology and the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, S. 1-16
ISSN: 1476-4989
Abstract
Redistricting reformers have proposed many solutions to the problem of partisan gerrymandering, but they all require either bipartisan consensus or the agreement of both parties on the legitimacy of a neutral third party to resolve disputes. In this paper, we propose a new method for drawing district maps, the Define–Combine Procedure, that substantially reduces partisan gerrymandering without requiring a neutral third party or bipartisan agreement. One party defines a map of
$2N$
equal-population contiguous districts. Then the second party combines pairs of contiguous districts to create the final map of N districts. Using real-world geographic and electoral data, we employ simulations and map-drawing algorithms to show that this procedure dramatically reduces the advantage conferred to the party controlling the redistricting process and leads to less-biased maps without requiring cooperation or non-partisan actors.
In: HKS Working Paper No. RWP22-012, 2022
SSRN
In: HKS Working Paper No. RWP19-028, March 2022
SSRN
Working paper
In: Political science research and methods: PSRM, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 654-662
ISSN: 2049-8489
AbstractInequalities in voter participation between groups of the population pose a problem for democratic representation. We use administrative data on 6.7 million registered voters to show that a previously-ignored characteristic of voters—access to a personal automobile—creates large disparities in in-person voting rates. Lack of access to a car depresses election day voter turnout by substantively large amounts across a variety of fixed-effects models that account for other environmental and voter characteristics. Car access creates the largest hindrance to voting for those people who live farther from the polls. These effects do not appear for absentee voting, suggesting a simple policy solution to solve large disparities in political participation. This study contributes to the theoretic understanding of political participation as well as the impact of potential policy reforms to solve participatory gaps.
In: HKS Working Paper No. RWP20-032
SSRN
Working paper
In: Legislative studies quarterly, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 713-752
ISSN: 1939-9162
Lobbying presents an attractive postcongressional career, with some former congressional members and staffers transitioning to lucrative lobbying careers. Precisely why congressional experience is valued is a matter of ongoing debate. Building on research positing a relationship between political uncertainty and demand for lobbyists, we examine conditions under which lobbyists with past congressional experience prove most valuable. To assess lobbyist earnings, we develop a new measure, Lobbyist Value Added, that reflects the marginal contribution of each lobbyist on a contract, and show that previous measures understate the value of high‐performing lobbyists. We find that former staffers earn revenues above their peers during times of uncertainty, and former members of Congress generate higher revenue overall, which we identify by comparing revenues generated by individuals who narrowly won election to those who narrowly lost. These findings help characterize when lobbyists with different skillsets prove most valuable and the value added by government experience.
In: Social science history: the official journal of the Social Science History Association, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 81-108
ISSN: 1527-8034
This article presents and analyzes the most comprehensive database to date of significant acts of Congress—from 1789 to 2010—to test whether divided party control of government affects the number of important acts Congress passes. We find that unified control corresponds with one additional significant act passed per Congress in the nineteenth century and four additional such acts in the twentieth century. However, party control of government cannot explain the broad historical trends in the rate at which Congress passes significant legislation. Nixon in 1969 was far more successful with a Democratic Congress than was McKinley in 1897 with a Republican one.
Neighborhood Defenders and The Power of Delay -- Land Use Regulations and Multifamily Housing Development -- Land Use Regulations and Public Input -- Who are the Neighborhood Defenders? -- Neighborhood Defense Tactics -- Gentrification, Affordable Housing, and Housing Reform.