Suchergebnisse

This paper presents two approaches to interpretation of collective terms in social and political philosophy. The author proves that realism is founded on series of logical mistakes and doubtful metaphors, and argues in favor of constructivism. ; У статтi розглядаються двi стратегiї iнтерпретацiї збiрних понять у соцiальнiй i полiтичнiй фiлософiї. Автор доводить, що реалiзм базується на серiї логiчних помилок i сумнiвних аналогiй, та аргументує на користь стратегiї конструктивiзму.

The article examines the metaphilosophical issue of the philosophizing subjects. The transcendental argument addresses the inquiry into what enables the variety of existing philosophizing practices. A conceptual model of philosophizing subjects is developed using the reconstructed Kantian model of the mind. Following this model, the article discusses marginal and mainstream types. The former comprises epigones and skeptics, while the latter encompasses dogmatic metaphysicians, scientific rationalists, relativists, and critical rationalists. In the modeling of philosopher-innovator types, the concept of maximalist and minimalist philosophies by Tatarkiewicz is also incorporated.