Suchergebnisse

For the first time, the findings of the integrated study of the history of the Military Scientific Library of the Mikhailovskaya Military Artillery Academy are presented. The study covers its development since 1820 when it was founded as the library of the Artillery School up to the period of 1863-1917 when it became the specialized library of the Mikhail Artillery Academy and School. Printed catalogs of books of the Military Scientific Library of the Academy and School 1871 and 1895 are characterized. For the first time, other library's catalogs are analyzed to be introduced into scientific use. The author characterizes and compares book catalogs of other universal military scientific libraries (those of General Staff, General Staff Nikolaevskaya Academy) with the catalogs of Mikhailovskaya Academy Military Scientific Library) and concludes that the latter has acquired the most complete book collection on artillery in the country. The collection matches science potential of this educational institution. Many prominent researchers well-known in Russia and abroad have taught at the Academy and the School. Their works are available not only from the Academy and School Library, but also can be found in the book collections of many libraries subordinate to the Military Ministry.This study is to expand the idea of military scientific libraries of the country, the knowledge of their history, collection development principles. Its findings will be useful to librarians of military educational institutions and academic libraries in the aspect of materials selection and efficient collection development. ; В статье впервые представлены итоги комплексного исследования истории образования и развития военно-научной библиотеки Михайловской военной артиллерийской академии. Выявлен и охарактеризован её путь от библиотеки Артиллерийского училища (с 1820 г.) до отраслевой военно-научной библиотеки Михайловской артиллерийской академии и училища (1863–1917). Рассмотрены печатные каталоги книг военно-научной библиотеки академии и училища 1871 и 1895 гг. Проанализированы и впервые введены в научный оборот другие каталоги. На основе сравнительной характеристики количественных показателей каталогов книг универсальных военно-научных библиотек (Главного штаба, Николаевской академии Генерального штаба) с каталогами книг военно-научной библиотеки Михайловской артиллерийской академии доказано, что последняя представляла собой наиболее полный в стране книжный фонд по артиллерии. Отражён научный потенциал учебного заведения. Установлено, что в академии и училище преподавали учёные, широко известные и в России, и за рубежом. Подготовленные ими научные труды имелись не только в библиотеке академии и училища, но и в книжных фондах многих библиотек Военного министерства.Проведённое исследование расширило представление о военно-научных библиотеках страны, истории их развития, особенностях комплектования. Полученные результаты будут полезны библиотекарям военно-учебных заведений и научных библиотек вузов в решении задач подбора литературы и наиболее оптимального комплектования фонда.

This article is devoted to the research on the concept and features of the advocate's wrongful cooperation with law-enforcement bodies and the circumstances that influence the severity of a disciplinary penalty in the result of such cooperation. A list of certain features is given to distinguish the lawful cooperation of an advocate with law-enforcement bodies from the wrongful one, which leads to bringing the advocate to the disciplinary responsibility. The author ascertains the forms in which the wrongful cooperation of an advocate and law-enforcement bodies may occur. The article determines that law-enforcement bodies often use the information that an advocate possesses due to his/her special professional status in order to perform their functions. Besides, the article examines the possibility for an advocate to be a whistleblower under the Law of Ukraine on Prevention of Corruption. The article also analyzes the decision of the Supreme Court in the administrative case where the decision of the Higher Qualification and Disciplinary Bar Commission (HQDB) on bringing the advocate to the disciplinary responsibility and imposing a disciplinary penalty of depriving him the right to advocacy for a wrongful cooperation with law-enforcement bodies is appealed. In this research the attention is paid to the wrongdoer's arguments and the corresponding legal position of the Supreme Court which, having used the acts of the national legislation, determined advocate's actions to be illegal and denied the claimant's demands. The author defines the category of a "wrongful cooperation of an advocate with law-enforcement bodies", determines its features, and suggests the ways for improving the effectiveness of bringing wrongdoers to the disciplinary responsibility in case of such cooperation. Keywords: a disciplinary offence, a disciplinary penalty, a confidant, a whistleblower, secret investigatory (inquiry) operations, tracking measures.