Suchergebnisse

The fundamental link between the right to work and the right to education established at the conferences on education policy held by the Federation of Geman Trade Unions in 1976 is one of those elements of trade-union policy in which, with education understood as "participation" in progress in science, research and "technology", trade union policy necessarily assumed an anti-capitalist, democratic character. In it, education is no longer conceived as qualification alone, but as a human right, which is equated with the right to work and hence points, in the same way as this right to the limits to economic, capitalist and social organization.

Payments for Environmental Services (PES) schemes present a new approach that creates a conditional benefit transfer between upland providers of environmental services and the downstream beneficiaries of these services. Such schemes can take the advantage of upland-lowland interactions in generating environmental benefits while improving the livelihoods of upper-catchment agricultural households. The past few years have witnessed a surge of interest in the development of PES schemes in Asia. The Vietnamese Government expressed recently its interest in starting such a scheme to protect fragile upper-catchments whose degradations are causing problems, among others, on hydro-electric infrastructures. Northern provinces of Vietnam are characterized by biophysical, social, and cultural diversity. The region suffers from severe environmental problems such as deforestation, soil degradation, and loss of biodiversity. As a result, the livelihoods of agricultural households may be unsustainable. Moreover, they are also producing negative externalities for lower parts of the countries. However, households in upper catchments are heterogeneous because they have unequal access to natural resources. The upper-catchments are generally composed of a narrow bottom-valley, where irrigated rice fields are found, and of surrounding sloping land with upland rice, maize and cassava. The differential access to those compartments of the watershed has some important consequences in terms of household farming practices and livelihood strategies. The proposed paper is organized in two parts. The first part reports farm household surveys and proposes a typology of farmers living in two typical small watersheds. The second, through a simplified model of farms analyses how the poorest households would respond to such a PES scheme. Results of farm surveys showed that access to lowland paddies is uneven among agricultural households. Even in situations of apparent abundance of water, an important share of the villagers had little access to water during the months where it would be critically needed to cultivate a second rice crop. Therefore, watershed governance has far-reaching consequences that need to be recognized. We developed a recursive dynamic model shifting cultivators that integrated the dynamics of soil fertility over time and farmers decisions in order to analyse their potential participations in PES schemes. We simulated farmers without paddy land, and without access to markets. The model predicted that unless in-kind grain transfers are feasible, studied agricultural households are unlikely to participate voluntarily into a land retirement program. Overall, there is no easy solution to tackle both environmental and welfare issues of poorest potential suppliers of environmental services in the upper-catchments of Northern provinces of Vietnam, especially when they do not have access to markets.

In Asia, there is a surge of interest in the development of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) programs. They represent a new approach that focuses directly on creating a conditional benefit transfer between providers and beneficiaries of environmental services. More specifically, in Vietnam, a Fund for the Protection and Development of Forestry has been recently established that puts in place the mechanisms for the payment of fees by downstream users of watershed services to finance forestry projects in the upper-catchments. This paper reviews the potential response of upland farming households to a PES scheme that rewards them to set aside part of land for the production of environmental services. We examine the viability of PES schemes targeted at agricultural households of the upper-catchments in Northern Vietnam. We focus our attention on households identified as the poorest in the upper-catchment areas, i.e. those with a small endowment of productive land, limited access to water for irrigation, and low access to markets. We find that farmers are unlikely to participate in a voluntary land retirement program unless they are ¿compensated¿ for the loss in food production and a ¿forced¿ set aside program is likely to generate an overall negative impact on both poverty and environmental protection. Development and dissemination of improved technologies that increase food yields is a complementary strategy to promote environmental protection.

Northern provinces of Vietnam suffer from environmental problems such as deforestation, soil degradation, and loss of biodiversity. As a result, the livelihoods of most agricultural households are unsustainable. Moreover, the current land use practices are also producing negative externalities that adversely affect the downstream areas. Deforestation and slash-and-burn cultivation techniques are blamed by some governmental organizations as the main causes for the problem. A mix of incentives (generally subsidies), technical assistance (usually improved and sustainable agricultural practices), and regulation have been used to address the problem. While some progress can be observed in terms of reforestation, many agricultural households are still employing unsustainable agricultural practices that will in the medium term affect their own livelihoods. Land use practices, which would bring about environmental benefits, include forest plantation, agro-forestry, tree-based land use alternatives and agro-ecologically sound practices such as conservation agriculture (Gouyon, 2002). However, the environmental services these land use provide, i.e. watershed services, biodiversity conservation and carbon storage are usually un-rewarded and only indirectly connected to economic activities (Bui Dung The et al., 2004). Payments for Environmental Services (PES) schemes present a new approach that focuses directly on creating a conditional benefit transfer between the upland providers of environmental services and the downstream beneficiaries. Such schemes can take the advantage of upland-lowland interactions in generating environmental benefits while improving the livelihoods of upland farmers. The past few years have witnessed a surge of interest in the development of PES schemes in Asia. In Vietnam, while some projects using the conceptual framework of PES are being initiated in the central and southern part of the country (e.g. WWF, 2007), no PES schemes are currently being implemented in the upper catchment areas of Northern Vietnam (Wunder et al., 2005). However, the Vietnamese Government expressed recently its intention to start such a scheme to protect fragile upper-catchments whose degradation is causing problems on hydro-electric infrastructures. Households in upper-catchments have unequal access to natural resources. The upper-catchments are generally composed of narrow valley bottoms, where irrigated rice fields are found and surrounding sloping land where upland rice, maize and cassava are the principal crops. The differential access to these two types of land has some important consequences on household farming practices and livelihood strategies. The main objective of this paper is to review the potential responses of the different types of households to a PES scheme that would reward farmers to set aside some land for forestry projects. Subsequently, we will investigate if poorly endowed farmers would gain from participating in such a scheme. While, some analytical work has already given general results (Zilberman et al., 2006), we would look at the specificity of PES schemes targeted at agricultural households of the upper-catchments in Northern Vietnam. The proposed paper is organized in two parts. The first part proposes a typology of farmers of two typical upper-catchments of the northern province of Yen Bai, Vietnam. The second, using a simplified farm model analyses how households with different endowments would respond to such a PES scheme. The Sai Luong and the Pan Cang catchments were selected for their contrasted water availability and access to markets. The villagers of the Sai Luong catchment, in Nam Bung commune, share a relatively large area of flat valley bottom where rice paddies are grown. Most farmers do not have access to the input or output markets. On the other hand, the villagers of the Pang Cang catchment, in Suoi Giang commune, have only access to sloping land. They are now increasingly making use of w