Suchergebnisse

This study addresses the issue of household food consumption, its relation to gender and to food policy in Indonesia. Using econometric analyses of the Indonesian Family Life Survey, the study reveals that food expenditure patterns, particularly those of the poor households, warrant food policy attention

"Addresses the issue of household food consumption, its relation to gender and to food policy in Indonesia. Using econometric analyses of the Indonesian Family Life Survey, the study reveals that food expenditure patterns, particularly those of the poor households, warrant food policy attention. The poor households spent more on alcohol and tobacco goods when their income increased. The impact evaluation of the 'Rice for the Poor' program reveals that the program enabled beneficiaries to increase expenditures on nutrient-rich, animal source foods; however, unintended program impacts also exist. The analysis of gender roles indicates that resource distribution and power relations within households are important considerations in the development of food policy"--

Introduction/Main Objectives: Significant price increases in food items and uncertainty in the market probably have a severe impact on society, and especially on low-income households. Background Problems: The increases in food prices could have a large impact on the economy and specifically on households. Thus, this study was conducted to investigate what the demand for food, specifically high-nutrient food items, and the impact on welfare are like in Indonesian households when food prices rise. Novelty: There is a great deal of empirical research into the impact of food price changes on household welfare, however studies that have focused on high-nutrient commodities, in particular on self-produced food, are still limited. Many of the previous studies used cross-sectional data for one period but this study used two-wave longitudinal data. Research Methods: Using a large sample of data from the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS), this study employed the quadratic almost ideal demand system (QUAIDS) to identify the demand pattern and applied compensating variation (CV) to understand the impact of soaring food prices on welfare changes. Findings/Results: Overall, the analysis of the impact notes that when prices increase, all household groups would experience welfare losses. The poorest households would experience less of a welfare loss than the richest households, while a larger welfare loss is suffered by households in Java and rural areas. Conclusion: For the low-income households, having their own productive farms could overcome any economic shocks threatening them. Thus, the government should support small-scale farming through such strategic policies as giving them assistance and training in how to manage a small farm.

Background: In 2014, a group of 512 households in multipurpose water systems and also relying on unimproved water, sanitation, and hygiene practices in the Greater Accra region of Ghana were randomly selected to participate in water quality self-testing and also receipt of information in the form of handouts on how to improve water quality. Objectives and Research Design: Using a cluster-randomized controlled design, we study the health, sanitation, and hygiene behavior impacts of the household water quality testing and information experiment. Subjects: The study has three arms: (1) adult household members, (2) schoolgoing children, and (3) control group. Measures: The study measures the effects on handwashing with soap, cleanliness of households, and prevalence of diarrhea and self-reported fever. We also address impacts on child health and nutrition outcomes, particularly diarrhea and anthropometric outcomes. Results: We show that there is high household willingness to participate in this intervention on water quality self-testing. About 7 months after households took part in the intervention, the study finds little impacts on health outcomes and on sanitation- and hygiene-related risk-mitigating behaviors, regardless of the intervention group, either schoolchildren or adult household members. Impacts (direction and extent) are rather homogeneous for most of the outcomes across treatment groups. Conclusions: The study discusses the implications of the findings and also offers several explanations for the lack of transmission of impacts from the household water quality testing and information intervention on health outcomes and on sanitation and hygiene behaviors.

Indonesia telah memasuki fase bonus demografi sejak tahun 2012 ketika beban ketergantungan penduduk berada di bawah 50 per 100 penduduk produktif. Namun, berdasarkan proyeksi beban ketergantungan penduduk tahun 2010-2035 tidak semua provinsi di Indonesia akan meraih bonus demografi, salah satunya adalah Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Besarnya beban ketergantungan penduduk Sumatera Barat tercermin dari pergeseran struktur umur penduduk yang dipengaruhi oleh dinamika demografi yang berlangsung dari beberapa dekade sebelumnya. Tulisan ini akan menguraikan secara time series berlangsungnya ketiga komponen demografi di Sumatera Barat. Tren mortalitas bayi dan anak mengalami penurunan, bahkan pada 2012 telah mengindikasikan berada di akhir masa transisi demografi. Namun, penurunan mortalitas tersebut tidak diiringi dengan penurunan fertilitas yang signifikan. Tingkat fertilitas yang masih tinggi menjadi penyumbang bertambahnya beban ketergantungan penduduk muda. Kondisi tersebut diperparah dengan angka migrasi neto yang konsisten minus di setiap periode sehingga proporsi penduduk umur produktif tidak mengalami penambahan yang signifikan.

One of the objectives of the fiscal policy is to improve public welfare. Still, there are funding constraints to improve welfare in some countries. Therefore, fiscal management to increase welfare must be implemented efficiently and effectively. In this research, to improve welfare, the fiscal policy will be focused on health, education and community empowerment which are the components of the HDI. This research used quantitative method with regression equation to explain the impact of fiscal and social policy, in the form of Recipients of Health Insurance Contribution Assistance (Penerima Bantuan Iuran Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional/ PBI JKN), physical special allocation found (Dana Alokasi Khusus/DAK) for health and education sector, village fund, region's budget expenditure, locally generated revenue (Pendapatan Asli Daerah/PAD), and poverty level on human development index (HDI) improvement. The locus for this research is all regencies/cities in Indonesia that use panel data. The results of this research were divided into three findings. First, there were research variables with unidirectional results and significant improvement on HDI, which are physical DAK for the health and education sector, village funds, social expenditure, and PAD. Second, there were variables with unidirectional impact but it does not have a significant impact on the HDI improvement (i.e. PBI JKN). Third, there were variables with unidirectional and significant impact, such as personnel expenditure, material expenditure, capital expenditure, and poverty level.