Suchergebnisse

Od 2009 r. tworzony jest w Polsce nowy system zarządzania rozwojem, w którym szczególne znaczenie przypada planowaniu strategicznemu oraz programowaniu rozwoju. Kształtowanie polityki rozwoju określają dokumenty strategiczne nowej generacji, do których należą: Długookresowa Strategia Rozwoju Kraju Polska 2030. Trzecia fala nowoczesności (DSRK), Strategia Rozwoju Kraju 2020. Aktywne społeczeństwo, konkurencyjnagospodarka, sprawne państwo (SRK 2020) oraz dziewięć strategii rozwoju (tzw. strategie zintegrowane). Jedną z nich jest Strategia innowacyjności i efektywności gospodarki.Autorka stawia tezę, że nowy system zarządzania rozwojem w Polsce ma charakter hierarchiczny, a dokumenty strategiczne są spójne i powiązane ze sobą. Poza tym polityka rozwoju jest skoncentrowana terytorialnie oraz tematycznie.Celem artykułu jest scharakteryzowanie głównych dokumentów strategicznych w nowym systemie zarządzania rozwojem w Polsce ze zwróceniem szczególnej uwagi na obszary strategiczne oraz cele i priorytety rozwojowe. Nowy paradygmat zarządzania rozwojem w Polsce oznacza między innymi świadomą strategię realizacji celów przy wykorzystaniu funduszy unijnych oraz więcej kompetencji otrzymanych przez samorządy. Szczególnym elementem nowego systemu zarządzania rozwojem są strategie rozwoju regionów, powiatów oraz gmin.

Since 2009 the new management system of development has been in operation in Poland. Strategic planning and the programming of development are of special importance in this system. The article aims to characterise the main strategic documents in the new management system of development in Poland with a particular attention paid to the strategic areas and priorities of development. The author put forward the hypothesis indicating that a new management system of development seems to be hierarchical in nature and strategic documents are mutually coherent and interconnected. Moreover, a development policy has been designed as a regionally and thematically concentrated one.

Purpose – The aim of the article is to present the problem of energy security as a key element of the economic security of the state. The study presents methods of measuring energy security, and then the study analyzes the dependence on energy imports of the EU countries. A special place was devoted to the Polish economy – in the context of searching for an answer to the question of whether Poland has a chance to achieve independence from the import of energy resources in the coming years. Research method – The article uses the method of descriptive and explanatory research, mainly the analysis of Eurostat data, as well as the cause and effect analysis based on a review of the literature on the subject. Results – Presentation of Poland's energy security in comparison with other EU countries, paying special attention to (no) dependence on imported energy resources. Originality/value/implications/recommendation – The article presents quantitative and qualitative methods of measuring energy security, and then presents a ranking of the EU countries from the point of view of the index of energy dependence on imports, de facto from Russia. Moreover, the paper indicates forecasts for the Polish economy in the context of its energy security.

Purpose – The aim of the article is to diagnose the export and import activity of Polish voivodships through the prism of spatial concentration, and to investigate whether the import diversification index is the same as the export diversification index, and whether the diversification index loses its methodological value in determining both export and import activity of Polish voivodships due to the difficulties in assigning trade flows to a specific voivodeship. Reseach method – The article contains an analysis based on a review of the literature and calculations regarding the spatial concentration of exports and imports of Polish voivodships using the diversification index. The article uses the method of descriptive and explanatory research. Results – Presentation of the share of voivodeships in Poland's export and import and the scope of spatial concentration measured by the diversification index in 1994–2019. Originality / value / implications / recommendations – The scope of spatial concentration of exports and imports expressed by the diversification index, in the analyzed period 1994–2019, did not change significantly, and the number of voivodships responsible for at least 75% of Polish exports was slightly higher than in the case of imports. At the same time, the importance of the 'non‑classified voivodship' category increasing each year – almost 1/4 of Polish exports and almost 1/5 of imports are not assigned to any voivodship, which implies a decrease in the significance of the methodological value of the diversification index.