Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
81 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Cornell Studies in Political Economy Ser
Cover -- A Certain Idea of Europe -- Title -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- List of Abbreviations -- Introduction: The Institutional Construction of Interests -- PART I: Choosing the Community Model -- 1. The Parting of the Ways -- 2. The Battle Widens -- 3. The Choice for the Community -- 4. Accepting the Community Model -- PART II: From Community to Union -- 5. Making the Community Monetary -- 6. Relaunching the Community -- 7. Entering Euroland -- Conclusion: Ideas into Interests -- Index
In: French politics, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 125-127
ISSN: 1476-3427
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 909-910
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 446-463
ISSN: 1466-4429
In: International theory: a journal of international politics, law and philosophy, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 501-538
ISSN: 1752-9727
Should constructivist research engage empirical debates with other approaches, especially non-constructivists? Recent calls for 'eclectic' and 'pluralistic' scholarship seem to encourage engagement, including across epistemological divides many constructivists have long perceived with non-constructivists. Yet this literature downplays competition between approaches, instead emphasizing that they answer different parts of questions. In seeming to evoke a division of labor, the eclectic turn actually strengthens a sense that approaches occupy distinct spaces. This article offers a sympathetic corrective to the eclectic turn, and to common accounts of older epistemological divides. Before eclectic combinations, empirical work necessarily begins from contrasting accounts on the same terrain. Only a naïve positivist imagines that meaningful scholarship tests solitary hypotheses against reality. Today's scholars vary in how far they move toward more socially based epistemologies, with constructivists moving furthest – and the further we move, the more the shape and significance of our accounts depends on contrasts to others. Thus, all scholars should seek out competing alternatives,especiallyconstructivists. After making this point, the article unpacks how it has been obscured by four arguments that limit competition between constructivist claims and alternatives, concerning constitutiveness, understanding, holistic methodology, and anti-foundationalism. Each view contains errors that can be corrected without undercutting the epistemological commitments of its proponents. This clears the way for introducing more competition into constructivism and into the eclectic turn more generally. All scholars, including all constructivists, working within their own epistemologies, will do their best work through contrasts to alternatives across our old divides.
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 573-574
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: International theory: IT ; a journal of international politics, law and philosophy, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 501-538
ISSN: 1752-9719
World Affairs Online
In: The Relevance of Political Science, S. 148-168
In: Security studies, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 791-801
ISSN: 1556-1852
SSRN
Working paper
In: Security studies, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 791-801
ISSN: 0963-6412
In: Revue française de science politique, Band 62, Heft 4, S. XXIV-XXIV
ISSN: 1950-6686