Power as an energy: The intentional theory of power by Bertrand Russell
In: Politeia: naučni časopis Fakulteta političkih nauka u Banjoj Luci za društvena pitanja, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 235-249
ISSN: 2566-2805
4 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Politeia: naučni časopis Fakulteta političkih nauka u Banjoj Luci za društvena pitanja, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 235-249
ISSN: 2566-2805
In: Zbornik Matice Srpske za društvene nauke: Proceedings for social sciences, Heft 124, S. 75-87
ISSN: 2406-0836
The author critically presents Talcott Parsons' theory of power. According to Parsons, power is a generalized capacity to secure the performance of binding obligations by units in a system of collective organization when the obligations are legitimized with reference to their bearing on collective goals and where in case of recalcitrance there is a presumption of enforcement by negative situational sanctions - whatever the actual agency of that enforcement. This definition of power does not offer enough satisfying answers to the issues of interest and power conflicts as well as of social and political change.
In: Politicka misao, Band 43, Heft 2, S. 59-78
The author analyzes the classical postulate of Hobbes' political theory, starting from the negation of man's social character, with which Hobbes broke from the Aristotelian tradition. The author also shows through Hobbes' theory that the category of fear is a crucial notion in modern political science. During the later development of political thought, however, the category of fear remained outside the main scope of interest of political theory, it was pushed on the margins of theoretical study & was thrown out of the field of politics. The author stresses that power, & the desire for it is Hobbes' political constant, seeing the thesis on power as one Hobbes' most significant politico-sociological or even anthropological theses. It could also be said that in Hobbes' model, fear produces power, namely, that power, to use the contemporary language of psychoanalysis, is a compensation for fear & insecurity. The author also shows that Hobbes built his entire political theory on conclusions which he drew from the analysis of an extreme situation, the situation of civil war, i.e. war of all against all. His doctrine of the natural state is based one the experience of civil war. People want the same things, of which there is not enough to go around, & so they become enemies. The author draws the conclusion that the superior sovereignty of Leviathan came about in the following categorical way: instinct for self-preservation -- fear of violent death -- distrust -- a conflict of all against all -- social contract -- sovereign power of the state of Leviathan. References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Politička misao, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 59-78