Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Cambridge studies in philosophy
In: Critical essays on the classics
In: Metascience: an international review journal for the history, philosophy and social studies of science, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 491-495
ISSN: 1467-9981
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 103, Heft 1, S. 1-42
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 88, Heft 3, S. 341-358
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, Band 73, Heft 1
ISSN: 1613-0650
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 85, Heft 1, S. 25-54
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 77, Heft 3, S. 321-352
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, OUP Editors, Gregg D. Caruso and Owen Flanagan, Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
In: Cambridge elements. Elements in ethics
This Element examines the concept of moral responsibility as it is used in contemporary philosophical debates and explores the justifiability of the moral practices associated with it, including moral praise/blame, retributive punishment, and the reactive attitudes of resentment and indignation. After identifying and discussing several different varieties of responsibility-including causal responsibility, take-charge responsibility, role responsibility, liability responsibility, and the kinds of responsibility associated with attributability, answerability, and accountability-it distinguishes between basic and non-basic desert conceptions of moral responsibility and considers a number of skeptical arguments against each. It then outlines an alternative forward-looking account of moral responsibility grounded in non-desert-invoking desiderata such as protection, reconciliation, and moral formation. It concludes by addressing concerns about the practical implications of skepticism about desert-based moral responsibility and explains how optimistic skeptics can preserve most of what we care about when it comes to our interpersonal relationships, morality, and meaning in life.
In: Oxford Handbooks
The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility is a collection of 33 articles by leading international scholars on the topic of moral responsibility and its main forms, praiseworthiness and blameworthiness. The articles in the volume provide a comprehensive survey on scholarship on this topic since 1960, with a focus on the past three decades. Articles address the nature of moral responsibility - whether it is fundamentally a matter of deserved blame and praise, or whether it is grounded anticipated good consequences, such as moral education and formation, or whether there are different kinds of moral responsibility.