Rewilding ist ein neuartiger, dynamischer Ansatz zur Renaturierung von Ökosystemen dessen mögliche Risiken und Nutzen in Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft umstritten sind. Bislang fehlt jedoch eine einheitliche Definition des Begriffs "Rewilding" und es gibt nur wenige empirische Untersuchungen seiner Effekte. Hier lege ich ein Rahmenwerk vor, das, basierend auf anerkannten ökologischen Theorien, verschiedene Herangehensweisen des Rewilding vereint und damit verbundene ökologische und gesellschaftliche Risiken und Nutzen erfasst. Es bietet damit einen Leitfaden für die Entwicklung, Umsetzung, Überwachung und Bewertung von Rewildingprojekten auf verschiedenen räumlichen Skalen und unter verschiedenen sozio-ökologischen Voraussetzungen von urbanen Räumen bis hin zu Wildnisgebieten. Des Weiteren präsentiere ich zwei Beispiele, wie Rewilding mithilfe von Wildtierkameras und multispecies-occupancy-Modellierungen empirisch untersucht werden kann. Die vorliegenden Studien testen die Annahmen des theoretischen Rahmenwerks und liefern einen wichtigen Beitrag zu den dringend benötigten empirischen Grundlagen für Rewilding.
1. Making agriculture sustainable is a global challenge. In the European Union (EU), the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is failing with respect to biodiversity, climate, soil, land degradation as well as socio-economic challenges. 2. The European Commission's proposal for a CAP post-2020 provides a scope for enhanced sustainability. However, it also allows Member States to choose low-ambition implementation pathways. It therefore remains essential to address citizens' demands for sustainable agriculture and rectify systemic weaknesses in the CAP, using the full breadth of available scientific evidence and knowledge. 3. Concerned about current attempts to dilute the environmental ambition of the future CAP, and the lack of concrete proposals for improving the CAP in the draft of the European Green Deal, we call on the European Parliament, Council and Commission to adopt 10 urgent action points for delivering sustainable food production, biodiversity conservation and climate mitigation. 4. Knowledge is available to help moving towards evidence-based, sustainable European agriculture that can benefit people, nature and their joint futures. 5. The statements made in this article have the broad support of the scientific community, as expressed by above 3,600 signatories to the preprint version of this manuscript. The list can be found here (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3685632).
Making agriculture sustainable is a global challenge. In the European Union (EU), the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is failing with respect to biodiversity, climate, soil, land degradation as well as socio‐economic challenges. The European Commission's proposal for a CAP post‐2020 provides a scope for enhanced sustainability. However, it also allows Member States to choose low‐ambition implementation pathways. It therefore remains essential to address citizens' demands for sustainable agriculture and rectify systemic weaknesses in the CAP, using the full breadth of available scientific evidence and knowledge. Concerned about current attempts to dilute the environmental ambition of the future CAP, and the lack of concrete proposals for improving the CAP in the draft of the European Green Deal, we call on the European Parliament, Council and Commission to adopt 10 urgent action points for delivering sustainable food production, biodiversity conservation and climate mitigation. Knowledge is available to help moving towards evidence‐based, sustainable European agriculture that can benefit people, nature and their joint futures. The statements made in this article have the broad support of the scientific community, as expressed by above 3,600 signatories to the preprint version of this manuscript. The list can be found here (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3685632). A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
Making agriculture sustainable is a global challenge. In the European Union (EU), the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is failing with respect to biodiversity, climate, soil, land degradation as well as socio-economic challenges especially in rural areas. The European Commission's proposal for a CAP post-2020 allows Member States to choose low-ambition implementation. With a new Parliament and Commission in place, the reform process has now restarted. It is therefore time to act on urgent challenges and address citizens' demands for sustainable agriculture, using the full breadth of available scientific evidence and knowledge. Concerned about attempts to dilute the environmental ambition of the future CAP, we call on the European Parliament, the EU's Member States and the European Commission to adopt ten urgent action points for delivering sustainable food production, biodiversity conservation, and climate mitigation towards an evidence-based, future-proof European agriculture. The ; This version of the paper has been made publically available for signatories to support, from 4.11.2019 until 19.2.2020. The final version is available as a paper in People and Nature.
Abstract Making agriculture sustainable is a global challenge. In the European Union (EU), the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is failing with respect to biodiversity, climate, soil, land degradation as well as socio-economic challenges. The European Commission's proposal for a CAP post-2020 provides a scope for enhanced sustainability. However, it also allows Member States to choose low-ambition implementation pathways. It therefore remains essential to address citizens' demands for sustainable agriculture and rectify systemic weaknesses in the CAP, using the full breadth of available scientific evidence and knowledge. Concerned about current attempts to dilute the environmental ambition of the future CAP, and the lack of concrete proposals for improving the CAP in the draft of the European Green Deal, we call on the European Parliament, Council and Commission to adopt 10 urgent action points for delivering sustainable food production, biodiversity conservation and climate mitigation. Knowledge is available to help moving towards evidence-based, sustainable European agriculture that can benefit people, nature and their joint futures. The statements made in this article have the broad support of the scientific community, as expressed by above 3,600 signatories to the preprint version of this manuscript. The list can be found here (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3685632). A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. ; Peer reviewed
In: Perino , A , Pereira , H M , Felipe-Lucia , M , Kim , H J , Kühl , H S , Marselle , M R , Meya , J N , Meyer , C , Navarro , L M , van Klink , R , Albert , G , Barratt , C D , Bruelheide , H , Cao , Y , Chamoin , A , Darbi , M , Dornelas , M , Eisenhauer , N , Essl , F , Farwig , N , Förster , J , Freyhof , J , Geschke , J , Gottschall , F , Guerra , C , Haase , P , Hickler , T , Jacob , U , Kastner , T , Korell , L , Kühn , I , Lehmann , G U C , Lenzner , B , Marques , A , Motivans Švara , E , Quintero , L C , Pacheco , A , Popp , A , Rouet-Leduc , J , Schnabel , F , Siebert , J , Staude , I R , Trogisch , S , Švara , V , Svenning , J C , Pe'er , G , Raab , K , Rakosy , D , Vandewalle , M , Werner , A S , Wirth , C , Xu , H , Yu , D , Zinngrebe , Y & Bonn , A 2022 , ' Biodiversity post-2020 : Closing the gap between global targets and national-level implementation ' , Conservation Letters , vol. 15 , no. 2 , e12848 . https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12848
National and local governments need to step up efforts to effectively implement the post-2020 global biodiversity framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity to halt and reverse worsening biodiversity trends. Drawing on recent advances in interdisciplinary biodiversity science, we propose a framework for improved implementation by national and subnational governments. First, the identification of actions and the promotion of ownership across stakeholders need to recognize the multiple values of biodiversity and account for remote responsibility. Second, cross-sectorial implementation and mainstreaming should adopt scalable and multifunctional ecosystem restoration approaches and target positive futures for nature and people. Third, assessment of progress and adaptive management can be informed by novel biodiversity monitoring and modeling approaches handling the multidimensionality of biodiversity change.
National and local governments need to step up efforts to effectively implement the post-2020 global biodiversity framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity to halt and reverse worsening biodiversity trends. Drawing on recent advances in interdisciplinary biodiversity science, we propose a framework for improved implementation by national and subnational governments. First, the identification of actions and the promotion of ownership across stakeholders need to recognize the multiple values of biodiversity and account for remote responsibility. Second, cross-sectorial implementation and mainstreaming should adopt scalable and multifunctional ecosystem restoration approaches and target positive futures for nature and people. Third, assessment of progress and adaptive management can be informed by novel biodiversity monitoring and modeling approaches handling the multidimensionality of biodiversity change.
This work is based on a workshop funded by iDiv via the German Research Foundation (DFG FZT 118 and 202548816). ; National and local governments need to step up efforts to effectively implement the post-2020 global biodiversity framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity to halt and reverse worsening biodiversity trends. Drawing on recent advances in interdisciplinary biodiversity science, we propose a framework for improved implementation by national and subnational governments. First, the identification of actions and the promotion of ownership across stakeholders need to recognize the multiple values of biodiversity and account for remote responsibility. Second, cross-sectorial implementation and mainstreaming should adopt scalable and multifunctional ecosystem restoration approaches and target positive futures for nature and people. Third, assessment of progress and adaptive management can be informed by novel biodiversity monitoring and modeling approaches handling the multidimensionality of biodiversity change. ; Publisher PDF ; Peer reviewed