Suchergebnisse

On the basis of the analysis of the norms of the current legislation of Ukraine, the author has studied the features and has defined the shortcomings of the procedure of the initiation of realizing the executive proceedings concerning compulsory execution of court decisions. It has been emphasized that the initiation of executive proceedings is an extremely important stage, which ensures the further lawfulness of the enforcement of measures of compulsory execution of court decisions. It has been established that an important condition at the specified stage is observance of the norms of the current legislation during the execution of all necessary documents, since any error may become an obstacle for the initiation of the respective proceedings. It has been noted that the beginning of compulsory execution of court decisions is closely linked with the implementation of the principle of discretion, because at this stage, the active behavior (participation) of a judgment creditor is mandatory. It has been proved that compliance with the principle of discretion, especially at the studied stage, is extremely a necessary and important condition, since in any case, a judgment creditor is the most interested party in compulsory execution of court decisions. It has been substantiated that the creation of executive groups (if necessary) is an important precondition for the qualitative implementation of measures for compulsory execution of court decisions, since the cooperation between the executive services, first, allows to effectively and expeditiously implement measures of compulsory execution of court decisions throughout the territory of Ukraine, secondly, it allows the performers to share experience that is positively reflected in their professional qualities. ; На підставі аналізу норм чинного законодавства України розглянуто особливості та визначено недоліки процедури початку здійснення виконавчого провадження щодо примусового виконання судового рішення. Наголошено, що на зазначеному етапі важливою умовою є дотримання норм чинного законодавства під час оформлення всіх необхідних документів, адже будь-яка помилка може стати перепоною для відкриття відповідного провадження.

The experience of some European countries in relation to the legal provision of implementing the measures of compulsory execution of judgments has been researched; as well as the possibilities of its use in Ukraine have been defined. In particular, it is necessary to increase the prestige of the work of an officer of justice (both public and private), which can be achieved by raising the level of remuneration of the officers of justice, as well as improving the social and legal guarantees of their activities; to expand the powers of the officers of justice (in particular, the state one) regarding the possibility to independently write off the funds from the debtor in the online mode for repayment of his debts to an execution creditor; to implement a system of remuneration of the officers of justice (public and private) on the example of France, where the remuneration of the work of the officers of justice is carried out not by the state but by the person concerned; to provide access to the officers of justice to national online registry of all individuals in the country, as well as the access to database of bank accounts and social insurance fund that guarantees the identification of the employer of the debtor (as a payer of social contributions); to introduce the institution of mediation, which, in turn, will first of all reduce the expenses for implementing executive proceedings, secondly, to establish a dialogue between an officer of justice and members of the executive proceedings in regard to the compulsory execution of judgments. It has been emphasized that the study of the positive experience of other countries will enable, first of all, to detect shortcomings in national legislation that defines the legal principles of the implementation of the measures of compulsory execution of judgments, and secondly, to determine the ways to eliminate these shortcomings. ; Досліджено досвід окремих країн Європи щодо правового забезпечення реалізації заходів примусового виконання судових рішень, а також визначено можливості його використання в Україні. Наголошено, що з'ясування позитивного досвіду інших країн надасть можливість, по-перше, виявити слабкі місця в національному законодавстві, що визначає правові засади реалізації заходів примусового виконання судових рішень; по-друге, визначити шляхи усунення цих недоліків.