Democracy and Citizenship: Theory and Practice
In: Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, Band 65, Heft 1_suppl, S. 3-3
ISSN: 1467-9248
60 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, Band 65, Heft 1_suppl, S. 3-3
ISSN: 1467-9248
In: Political studies review, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 91-92
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: Political studies review, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 422-422
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: Political studies review, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 244-245
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, Band 64, Heft 1_suppl, S. 3-3
ISSN: 1467-9248
In: Political studies review, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 573-573
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: Political studies review, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 239-239
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: Political studies review, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 414-415
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: Political studies review, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 264-265
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: Political studies review, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 147-148
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: Political studies review, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 410
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: Political studies review, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 414-415
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: European journal of political theory: EJPT, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 409-424
ISSN: 1741-2730
Rousseau's life and his work are notoriously paradoxical. This certainly applies to his work on property which includes one of the most powerful of all denunciations of private property (the Second Discourse) and an affirmation of private property as 'the most sacred of all citizens' rights, and in some respects more important than freedom itself' (in the essay on political economy in the Encyclopedie). In this paper, I explore the reasons for this seeming paradox, focusing upon Rousseau's twin concerns with inequality (rather than equality) and sincerity. In the end, Rousseau's treatment is not entirely consistent, but it does make sense.
In: European journal of political theory: EJPT, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 409-424
ISSN: 1474-8851
In: The British journal of politics & international relations: BJPIR, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 72-87
ISSN: 1467-856X
This article considers treatments of the Bible story of Naboth and Ahab in the work of two thinkers separated by more than a millennium: St Ambrose and John Ponet. Both men treat this as a story about (among other things) property and political authority. Their emphases are different but there are similarities that make them plausibly part of a common tradition of reading the Bible for political effect.