International Sharing of Pathogens and Genetic Sequence Data Under a Pandemic Treaty: What Linkages with the Nagoya Protocol and the PIP Framework?
In: Global Health Centre Policy Brief 2022
14 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Global Health Centre Policy Brief 2022
SSRN
In: The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 619-625
ISSN: 2211-6133
SSRN
In: Transnational Environmental Law, 6:3 (2017)
SSRN
In: In Razzaque, J. and Morgera, E. (eds.) Biodiversity and Nature Protection Law. Elgar Encyclopedia of Environmental Law Series, Cheltenham/Northampton, Edward Elgar, pp.237-250
SSRN
In: Veredas Do Direito, Band 13(26)
SSRN
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 157, S. 1-14
World Affairs Online
In: International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 223-238
ISSN: 1573-1553
AbstractEnsuring sustainability of earth systems is intrinsically dependent on the incorporation of equity and fairness in the regimes and institutions that govern the global economy. Accordingly, to design effective and just earth system governance (ESG), it is crucial to understand how the global economic system affects access to and allocation of environmental benefits and burdens among people and countries around the world and what are the relevant causal mechanisms. By focusing on trade and investment as two predominant elements of today's global economic system, this paper reviews the literature developed within the ESG project in 2008–2017 to explore the relationships between the global economic system and access to and allocation of environmental benefits and burdens. Our review shows that ESG scholarship has begun to highlight the dynamics of unfair access and allocation deriving from the global economic system, ranging from the direct impacts of trade and investment on environmental inequality and socioeconomic opportunities to the indirect equity implications of certification schemes, environmental decision-making processes and environmentally motivated restrictions in international trade and investment regimes. However, it also notes that critical questions about the identity of vulnerable groups and the potential pathways for more equitable sharing of benefits and burdens remain understudied by ESG scholars. Hence, we call for more critical analysis of the role of the global economic system in perpetuating unsustainable patterns of access and allocation in ESG, as well as research about the local impacts of the global economic system on environmental access and allocation.
In: Center for Trade and Economic Integration (CTEI) Working Paper No. 2017-02
SSRN
Working paper
In: Routledge research in environmental policy and politics
Introduction / Liliana B. Andonova, Moira V. Faul and Dario Piselli -- The effectiveness of partnerships : theoretical framework / Liliana B. Andonova and Moira V. Faul -- Governing biodiversity and clean energy with global partners / Liliana B. Andonova and Dario Piselli -- Protecting the Amazon and its people : the role of civil society in the local effectiveness of transnational partnerships / Livio Silva-Muller and Moira V. Faul -- Brokering private action for sustainable development : the role of the World Bank / Axel Michaelowa, Katharina Michaelowa and Liliana B. Andonova -- Advancing innovation and access to medicines : the achievements and unrealized potential of the product development partnership model / Marcela Fogaca Vieira, Ryan Kimmitt, Danielle Navarro, Anna Bezruki and Suerie Moon -- Sustaining partnerships : the global polio eradication initiative case / Mara Pillinger -- Founding the Global Partnership to End Violence Against Children : opportunities and challenges on the road to effectiveness / Susan L. Bissell and David Steven -- Partnerships under pressure : lessons on adaptation and overcoming challenges / Amanda Sardonis and Henry Lee -- Effectiveness of transnational partnership regimes in long-term resource revenue management / Jamie Fraser and Gilles Carbonnier -- Faultlines within sectors in partnership executive boards / Moira V. Faul and Younes Boulanguiem -- Conclusion / Liliana B. Andonova, Moira V. Faul and Dario Piselli.
In: Routledge research in environmental policy and politics
"Partnerships for Sustainability in Contemporary Global Governance investigates the goals, ideals, and realities of sustainability partnerships and offers a theoretical framework to help disentangle the multiple and interrelated pathways that shape their effectiveness. Partnerships are ubiquitous in research and policy discussions about sustainability and are important governance instruments for the provision of public goods. While partnerships promise a great deal, there is little clarity as to what they deliver. If partnerships are to break free from this paradox, more nuance and rigor are required for understanding and assessing their actual effects. This volume applies its original framework to diverse empirical cases in a way that could be extended to broader data sets and case studies of partnerships. The dual contribution of this volume, theoretical and empirical, holds promise for a more thorough and innovative understanding of the pathways to partnership effectiveness and the conditions that can shape their performance. The broad range of crosscutting analyses suggest important practical implications for the design of new partnerships and the updating of existing initiatives. This interdisciplinary book will be of great interest to researchers, students, and practitioners within international relations, political science, sociology, environmental studies and global studies, as well as the growing number of scholars in public policy, global health and organizational and business studies who are keen to gain a deeper understanding of the pathways and mechanisms that influence the outcomes and effectiveness of cross-sector collaboration and transnational governance more broadly."
In: Routledge Research in Environmental Policy and Politics
Partnerships for Sustainability in Contemporary Global Governance investigates the goals, ideals, and realities of sustainability partnerships and offers a theoretical framework to help disentangle the multiple and interrelated pathways that shape their effectiveness. Partnerships are ubiquitous in research and policy discussions about sustainability and are important governance instruments for the provision of public goods. While partnerships promise a great deal, there is little clarity as to what they deliver. If partnerships are to break free from this paradox, more nuance and rigor are required for understanding and assessing their actual effects. This volume applies its original framework to diverse empirical cases in a way that could be extended to broader data sets and case studies of partnerships. The dual contribution of this volume, theoretical and empirical, holds promise for a more thorough and innovative understanding of the pathways to partnership effectiveness and the conditions that can shape their performance. The broad range of crosscutting analyses suggest important practical implications for the design of new partnerships and the updating of existing initiatives. This interdisciplinary book will be of great interest to researchers, students, and practitioners within international relations, political science, sociology, environmental studies and global studies, as well as the growing number of scholars in public policy, global health and organizational and business studies who are keen to gain a deeper understanding of the pathways and mechanisms that influence the outcomes and effectiveness of cross-sector collaboration and transnational governance more broadly. The Open Access version of this book, available at www .taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.
In: Global policy: gp, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 161-177
ISSN: 1758-5899
AbstractGlobal health governance is in many ways proving more innovative and resilient than other sectors in global governance. In order to understand the mechanisms that have made these developments possible, this article draws on the concept of gridlock, as well as on the additional theoretical strands of metagovernance and adaptive governance, to conceptualize how global health governance has been able to adapt despite increasingly difficult conditions in the multilateral order. The remarkable degree of innovation that characterizes global health governance is the result of two interrelated conditions. First, developments that are normally associated with gridlock in multilateral cooperation, such as institutional fragmentation and growing multipolarity, have transformed, rather than gridlocked, global health governance. Second, global health actors have often been able to harness the opportunities offered by three important pathways of change, namely: (1) a significant degree of organizational learning and active feedback loops between epistemic and practice communities; (2) a highly polycentric system of governance; and (3) the increased role of political leadership as a catalyst for governance innovation. These trends are discussed in the context of three case studies of significant political, social and health relevance, namely HIV/AIDS, the 2014 Ebola outbreak and antimicrobial resistance.
Global health governance is in many ways proving more innovative and resilient than other sectors in global governance. In order to understand the mechanisms that have made these developments possible, this article draws on the concept of gridlock, as well as on the additional theoretical strands of metagovernance and adaptive governance, to conceptualize how global health governance has been able to adapt despite increasingly difficult conditions in the multilateral order. The remarkable degree of innovation that characterizes global health governance is the result of two interrelated conditions. First, developments that are normally associated with gridlock in multilateral cooperation, such as institutional fragmentation and growing multipolarity, have transformed, rather than gridlocked, global health governance. Second, global health actors have often been able to harness the opportunities offered by three important pathways of change, namely: (1) a significant degree of organizational learning and active feedback loops between epistemic and practice communities; (2) a highly polycentric system of governance; and (3) the increased role of political leadership as a catalyst for governance innovation. These trends are discussed in the context of three case studies of significant political, social and health relevance, namely HIV/AIDS, the 2014 Ebola outbreak and antimicrobial resistance.
BASE