Suchergebnisse

Arctic scientists wrote, in the 1998 Opportunities in Arctic Research: Final Report for the U.S. National Science Foundation, "For the last few decades the scientific community has expressed concern about the vulnerability of the Arctic and its residents to environmental, social, and economic changes . [Recent] research results show that arctic climate and ecosystems are indeed changing substantially with impacts on people living in and outside the Arctic." The scientists listed as the first key question, "How are the rapid social, political, economic and environmental changes occurring in the Arctic today affecting the people there? . Delegates to the 1998 Inuit Circumpolar Conference (ICC) passed a resolution supporting an international survey of living conditions in the Arctic. The resolution noted, "Rapid social change characterises all indigenous peoples of the Arctic . There is a need to document and compare the present state of living conditions and the development among the indigenous peoples of the Arctic." This essay presents a comparative study of living conditions among the Inuit and Saami peoples of the United States, Canada, Greenland, Norway, Sweden, and Finland and the indigenous peoples of the Kola and Chukotka Peninsulas in Russia. The main scientific institutions behind SLICA are Statistics Greenland; the Department of Political Science, University of Tromsø, Norway; the Centre for Research in International Migration and Ethnic Relations, University of Stockholm, Sweden; the Arctic Centre, University of Lappland, Finland; the Barents Centre for Social Research, the Kola Peninsula, Russia; the Russian Association of Indigenous Peoples of the North, Moscow, Russia; the Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska, Anchorage, U.S.A.; and the Groupe d'études inuit et circumpolaires (GÉTIC) of Laval University, Quebec City, Canada. The main indigenous organizations working with SLICA are ICC, the Saami Council and the Russian Association of Indigenous Peoples of the North. The project has six major objectives: (1) to develop a new research design for comparative investigations of the living conditions of the Inuit and Saami populations in the Arctic, which will include drawing up of a battery of nominal and operationalized indicators of living conditions based on earlier theoretical literature, consultations with aboriginal organizations, and public hearings; (2) to make a dynamic social analysis of the causal relations between different individual resources and between individual well-being and different political, economic, cultural, and technological settings; (3) to map the living conditions among the Inuit, Saami, and other indigenous peoples in Greenland, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, the Kola and Chukotka Peninsulas in Russia, Alaska, and the Northwest and Nunavut Territories, Nunavik, and Labrador in northern Canada. The mapping will facilitate intra- and international comparisons of the level of the living conditions in a number of dimensions; (4) to improve the basis for decision making in relation to policy planning and implementation; (5) to establish an interdisciplinary network of researchers and research institutions engaged in studying Arctic living conditions; and (6) to educate and involve postdocs, PhD candidates, and undergraduates under the SLICA project. .

"….Taking the structure and functioning of the Arctic regional economies and the degree of economic dependence as a point of departure, these region's self-reliance and comparative socio-economic performance is analyzed. The fundamental problem is still the dependency Arctic regions have on their mother economies in the south" "….the impact from climate changes and the global economy strongly influence the self-sufficiency constraints and potentials of the Arctic societies. Traditional approaches to economic valuation may not be sufficient to capture these relationships. Neo-classical economics and the trade off model look upon nature as a good commensurable with all other goods, and henceforward there is a substitution possibility. The rational self-interest and 'homo economicus' is however, not the same as responsible self-interest included in ecological economics. This suggests broader approaches to environmental uncertainties, which take into account ethical values and conflicts of interest". Contributors: Hans Aage, Iulie Aslaksen, Andrée Caron, Gérard Duhaime, Solveig Glomsröd, Jón Haukur Ingimundarson, Ivar Jonsson, Jack Kruse, Joan Nymand Larsen, Svein Mathiesen, Anna Ingeborg Myhr, Birger Poppel, Rasmus Ole Rasmussen, Erik Reinert, Hugo Reinert, Chris Southcott, Gorm Winther, Lyudmila Zalkind.