Mental Health Needs of Children in Care: Interview with Mr Patrick Tomlinson
In: Institutionalised children explorations and beyond, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 128-140
ISSN: 2349-3011
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Institutionalised children explorations and beyond, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 128-140
ISSN: 2349-3011
In: Institutionalised children explorations and beyond, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 118-129
ISSN: 2349-3011
In: Institutionalised children explorations and beyond, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 9-23
ISSN: 2349-3011
In: Institutionalised children explorations and beyond, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 274-275
ISSN: 2349-3011
In: Institutionalised children explorations and beyond, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 11-17
ISSN: 2349-3011
In: Institutionalised children explorations and beyond, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 115-127
ISSN: 2349-3011
In: Institutionalised children explorations and beyond, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 143-146
ISSN: 2349-3011
In: Institutionalised children explorations and beyond, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 281-282
ISSN: 2349-3011
In: Institutionalised children explorations and beyond, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 176-187
ISSN: 2349-3011
In: Child & family social work, Band 26, Heft 2, S. 231-239
ISSN: 1365-2206
AbstractAdoption, kinship care, and foster care are the oldest known forms of alternative care in India. Whilst these are recognized as the most appropriate forms of care today, institutional care has become the most dominant form of care in India in the last 100 years, although it is meant to be 'a measure of last resort'. As in most countries, childcare institutions in India cater for children up to 18 years old. The sudden withdrawal of support at 18 leaves these young people facing heightened challenges and poorer outcomes on the journey to independence, not only because of their fractured pasts but also due to a lack of planned interventions towards preparing them for life. This paper, based on an extensive desk review, chronologically examines the evolution of aftercare laws and practices in India along with the factors that contributed to the rise of institutional care. Reference is made to the influence of the criminal justice system on aftercare and the impact of India's ratification of United Nations Convention on Rights of the Child, the movement from a welfare to rights‐based approach. The paper concludes by discussing the current challenges and the possible way forward for care leavers in India.
In: Institutionalised children explorations and beyond, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 223-248
ISSN: 2349-3011
Widely across the globe, COVID has placed massive strain on various parameters of life, including child protection, health, education and economic systems. Apart from these visible threats, this situation has an ongoing devastating impact on the mental health and psychological well-being of people. The word of the law enforces care and support for children with disadvantages, disabilities and vulnerabilities on caregivers, Managers and Staff, managing Alternative Care programmes, but the spirit of such child protection laws also underlines the importance of caring for caregivers, especially in childcare institutions (CCIs). The well-being of the caregivers is the cornerstone of every well-functioning childcare institution and other residential care spaces. This article is designed to document the mental health status of caregivers (residential staff staying with children), in residential care spaces in the COVID times and to determine how the new stresses impacted them and the coping patterns they acquired in current situation; across different countries of South Asia, including Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. This exploratory rapid assessment project aimed to reach out to the registered childcare homes/ institutions, across the South Asian region, with the help of different NGOs, as well as Government mechanisms. The data was collected through purposive sampling and analysed quantitatively where the sample included the selected caregivers of participating CCIs across these nations. This study aimed to synthesize the responses of caregivers across the region; develop an analysis, which may help authorities to rethink, reform and strengthen the current practices, in order to develop approach-centred strategies for improving the well-being of caregivers as this has a direct bearing on the well-being of children in their care. Since the start of the COVID pandemic, for the residential caregivers, the access to external resources, including physical support from professional staff, has become restricted to bare minimum, due to lockdown and quarantine measures. Any interventions to prevent, treat and mitigate the effects of COVID among caregivers needed to be taken at the ground level by the care team management.
In: International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies: IJCYFS, Band 11, Heft 4.2, S. 160-187
ISSN: 1920-7298
This paper is a condensed version of a study entitled "Beyond 18: Leaving Child Care Institutions — A Study of Aftercare Practices in Five States of India", conducted and published in 2019 by Udayan Care, a charitable organisation, with support from UNICEF India and Tata Trusts. This research involved the participation of care leavers, government functionaries, duty-bearers, and civil society practitioners. It found that upon turning 18, youth transitioning out of child care institutions to independent life in India experience many challenges, such as securing housing and identity documents; accessing education, skill development, and employment opportunities; and garnering psychosocial support. This study also showed that absent or inadequate aftercare support during transition increases care leavers' vulnerabilities to homelessness, unemployment, substance misuse, and ruptured social relationships. It also found that continued aftercare support is necessary to foster independent living skills in these young people and enable their reintegration into mainstream society. While exploring the continuum from child care to aftercare, the researchers developed the concept of a "Sphere of Aftercare", comprising eight domains of support that are considered essential for a successful transition. The study revealed a lack of transition planning at the level of child care institutions and functionaries and a general lack of understanding of the holistic aftercare needs of youth throughout the eight identified domains. The study also found an absence of clarity about stakeholders' roles; a lack of data management with regard to the number of youth leaving care, leading to inadequate budget planning; and a lack of adequate monitoring mechanisms to assess care leavers' outcomes. In light of this study's findings, policy reforms and ways of developing robust aftercare programmes are recommended in relation to policy, practice, and law.
In: Institutionalised children explorations and beyond, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 57-67
ISSN: 2349-3011