Feeding the Fetus: On Interrogating the Notion of Maternal-Fetal Conflict
In: Feminist studies: FS, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 351
ISSN: 2153-3873
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Feminist studies: FS, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 351
ISSN: 2153-3873
In: Cultural diversity and ethnic minority psychology, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 45-56
ISSN: 1939-0106
In: Public Health Genomics, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 25-32
ISSN: 1662-8063
<i>Objective:</i> The present study reports on the important issue of how family communication and support regarding breast cancer risk affects interest in genetic testing and mental health. <i>Methods:</i> Participants (n = 221) were women aged 18–74 who had at least one relative of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, no personal history of breast or ovarian cancer, and lived within 60 miles of Seattle, Wash. <i>Results:</i> Communication about breast cancer risk was reported with very low frequency across all types of relatives. Women talked with their mothers and sisters more often than their fathers, brothers, or children. The only significant predictor of interest in genetic testing was the individual level variable of seeking social support. <i>Conclusion:</i> Social support needs might be a part of the genetic testing process.
In: Journal of health & social policy, Band 17, Heft 3, S. 1-20
ISSN: 1540-4064
In: Public Health Genomics, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 138-146
ISSN: 1662-8063
The Genetics in Primary Care (GPC) project is a USA national faculty development initiative with the goal of enhancing the training of medical students and primary care residents by developing primary care faculty expertise in genetics. Educational strategies were developed for the project by an executive committee with input from an advisory committee, comprising individuals with primary care, medical education and genetics expertise. These committees identified the key issues in genetics education for primary care as (1) considering inherited disease in the differential diagnosis of common disorders; (2) using appropriate counseling strategies for genetic testing and diagnosis, and (3) understanding the implications of a genetic diagnosis for family members. The group emphasized the importance of a primary care perspective, which suggests that the clinical utility of genetic information is greatest when it has the potential to improve health outcomes. The group also noted that clinical practice already incorporates the use of family history information, providing a basis for discussing the application of genetic concepts in primary care. Genetics and primary care experts agreed that educational efforts will be most successful if they are integrated into existing primary care teaching programs, and use a case-based teaching format that incorporates both clinical and social dimensions of genetic disorders. Three core clinical skills were identified: (1) interpreting family history; (2) recognizing the variable clinical utility of genetic information, and (3) acquiring cultural competency. Three areas of potential controversy were identified as well: (1) the role of nondirective counseling versus shared decision-making in discussions of genetic testing; (2) the intrinsic value of genetic information when it does not influence health outcomes, and (3) indications for a genetics referral. The project provides an opportunity for ongoing discussion about these important issues.
In: Genetics in Medicine, Band 15
SSRN