The Prestige accident is perhaps the last among a series of serious marine accidents that have significantly shaped the formulation of maritime safety policy worldwide. The main thesis of this paper is that in spite of recent progress in this area there is still a long way to achieve a truly 'proactive' maritime safety regime. A qualitative assessment on the nature of some major maritime safety policies and on the way that these are put forward is attempted, along with some opinions on possible pitfalls and on what needs to be done so that this process can be further improved.
There is a growing concern that the Earth's atmospheric composition is being altered by human activities which can lead to climate change. Policy measures to reduce carbon dioxide emissions are on the agenda of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the European Union (EU). Climate Change is an environmental problem and answers have to be sought among robust environmental policies that are often classified in market-based, command-and-control and voluntary instruments. Although there is evidence that many uncertainties surround the climate change phenomenon and the contribution of shipping, shipping is under severe political pressure. The paper presents an overview of the related uncertainties and environmental policies and focuses on emission standards and technology solutions. From a political point of view, it is easier to pass legislation that calls for technological and operational measures and may indeed have a high potential in reducing emissions.
""Formal Safety Assessment"" (FSA) was introduced as a tool to help in the evaluation of new regulations for maritime safety and the protection of the marine environment and is currently, the major risk assessment tool that is being used for policy-making. However, there is not much work done in FSA as regards the protection of the marine environment and especially the prevention of sea pollution. Taking into account that a major harm to the sea is the accidental spillage of oil and by acknowledging that there is no significant work on this matter, this paper attempts a literature review on the issue and comments on alternative approaches. To that effect, prior research on oil spill damage cost assessment is placed within context, and various alternative approaches are presented. This work is also viewed within the framework of recent IMO developments in this area.
This paper reports on recent analysis of oil spill cost data assembled by the International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund (IOPCF). Regression analyses of clean-up costs and total costs have been carried out, after taking care to convert to current prices and remove outliers. In the first place, the results of this analysis have been useful in the context of the ongoing discussion within the International Maritime Organization (IMO) on environmental risk evaluation criteria. Furthermore, these results can be useful in estimating the benefit of regulations that deal with the protection of marine environment and oil pollution prevention. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.