Suchergebnisse

Der Beitrag berichtet über die feministische Zusammenarbeit von Akademikerinnen und nicht-akademischen Frauengruppen am Beispiel einer ländlichen Arbeitsgruppe am Erwachsenenbildungszentrum in El Bierzo, Spanien. Ziel ist es, an diesem Fallbeispiel die Möglichkeiten der Zusammenarbeit mit diesen ländlichen Frauen in ihrem alltäglichen Überlebenskampf um egalitäre Perspektiven für die soziale Transformation der Geschlechterverhältnisse aufzuzeigen und deren Relevanz für die Frauenbewegung und feministische Theoriebildung in der vorliegenden Analyse herauszuarbeiten. Nach einer Diskussion der Entwicklung des Feminismus im Prozess der Modernisierung wird die Arbeit verschiedener akademischer und nicht-akademischer Frauengruppen und Netzwerke vorgestellt und deren Einflüsse auf den theoretischen Diskurs im intellektuellen Feminismus analysiert. Gefordert wird ein egalitärer Dialog, in dem die Stimmen und Kämpfe der Frauen, denen die Möglichkeit der Artikulation fehlt, mit einbezogen werden. (ICH).

Radicalization of youth leading to violent extremism in the form of terrorism is an urgent problem considering the rise of young people joining extremist groups of different ideologies. Previous research on the impact of counter-terrorism polices has highlighted negative outcomes such as stigmatizing minority groups. Drawing on qualitative research conducted under the PROTON project (2016-2019) by CREA-UB on the social and ethical impact of counter-terrorism policies in six EU countries, the present article presents and discusses the ways in which actions characterized by creating spaces for dialogue at the grassroots level are contributing to prevent youth violent radicalization. The results highlight four core elements underlying these spaces for dialogue: providing guidance to be safe in the exploration of extremist messages and violent radicalization; the rejection of violence; that dialogue is egalitarian; and that relationships are built on trust so that adolescents and young adults feel confident to raise their doubts. If taken into account, these elements can serve to elaborate dialogic evidence-based policies. The policies which include a dialogue between the scientific evidence and the people affected by them once implemented, achieve positive social impact.

Las comunidades de aprendizaje1 pretenden democratizar tanto el proceso como los resultados educativos (Elboj, 2002, 2005; Jausi, 2002). Los grupos interactivos democratizan el día a día del aula contribuyendo a superar la segregación. La formación de familiares abre la práctica cotidiana del centro y sus procesos de aprendizaje a quienesconviven en los domicilios con las chicas y los chicos. Las comisiones mixtas de trabajo colaboran en la gestión democrática de las escuelas e institutos. La formación intelectual y científica del profesorado logra que la democracia genere mejores resultados favoreciendo así su apoyo activo por crecientes sectores de las familias y de la sociedad. Las comunidades de aprendizaje colaboran y aprenden otras formas de hacer escuelas democráticas como, por ejemplo, el Proyecto Atlántida. ; Learning communities are trying to democratize both educational processes and outcomes. Interactive groups deal with this democratic practice by means of avoiding segregation in classrooms. Relatives' training makes possible the access of families to schools, so that they can contribute to improve their children's way of learning. Joint committees take part in the democratic management of primary and secondary schools. Teachers' intellectual and scientific background succeeds in having democracy to provide better results, which favours their implication in this process by means of the implementation of an active support to students' families and society in general. Learning communities take part and learn from other ways of turning schools into democratic places such us, for example, the Atlantis Project.

Las comunidades de aprendizaje pretenden democratizar tanto el proceso como los resultados educativos (Elboj, 2002, 2005; Jausi, 2002). Los grupos interactivos democratizan el día a día del aula contribuyendo a superar la segregación. La formación de familiares abre la práctica cotidiana del centro y sus procesos de aprendizaje a quienesconviven en los domicilios con las chicas y los chicos. Las comisiones mixtas de trabajo colaboran en la gestión democrática de las escuelas e institutos. La formación intelectual y científica del profesorado logra que la democracia genere mejores resultados favoreciendo así su apoyo activo por crecientes sectores de las familias y de la sociedad. Las comunidades de aprendizaje colaboran y aprenden otras formas de hacer escuelas democráticas como, por ejemplo, el Proyecto Atlántida.

Radicalization of youth leading to violent extremism in the form of terrorism is an urgent problem considering the rise of young people joining extremist groups of different ideologies. Previous research on the impact of counter-terrorism polices has highlighted negative outcomes such as stigmatizing minority groups. Drawing on qualitative research conducted under the PROTON project (2016-2019) by CREA-UB on the social and ethical impact of counter-terrorism policies in six EU countries, the present article presents and discusses the ways in which actions characterized by creating spaces for dialogue at the grassroots level are contributing to prevent youth violent radicalization. The results highlight four core elements underlying these spaces for dialogue: providing guidance to be safe in the exploration of extremist messages and violent radicalization; the rejection of violence; that dialogue is egalitarian; and that relationships are built on trust so that adolescents and young adults feel confident to raise their doubts. If taken into account, these elements can serve to elaborate dialogic evidence-based policies. The policies which include a dialogue between the scientific evidence and the people affected by them once implemented, achieve positive social impact.

Neuroscience has well evidenced that the environment and, more specifically, social experience, shapes and transforms the architecture and functioning of the brain and even its genes. However, in order to understand how that happens, which types of social interactions lead to different results in brain and behavior, neurosciences require the social sciences. The social sciences have already made important contributions to neuroscience, among which the behaviorist explanations of human learning are prominent and acknowledged by the most well-known neuroscientists today. Yet neurosciences require more inputs from the social sciences to make meaning of new findings about the brain that deal with some of the most profound human questions. However, when we look at the scientific and theoretical production throughout the history of social sciences, a great fragmentation can be observed, having little interdisciplinarity and little connection between what authors in the different disciplines are contributing. This can be well seen in the field of communicative interaction. Nonetheless, this fragmentation has been overcome via the theory of communicative acts, which integrates knowledge from language and interaction theories but goes one step further in incorporating other aspects of human communication and the role of context. The theory of communicative acts is very informative to neuroscience, and a central contribution in socioneuroscience that makes possible deepening of our understanding of most pressing social problems, such as free and coerced sexual-affective desire, and achieving social and political impact toward their solution. This manuscript shows that socioneuroscience is an interdisciplinary frontier in which the dialogue between all social sciences and all natural sciences opens up an opportunity to integrate different levels of analysis in several sciences to ultimately achieve social impact regarding the most urgent human problems.

Neuroscience has well evidenced that the environment and, more specifically, social experience, shapes and transforms the architecture and functioning of the brain and even its genes. However, in order to understand how that happens, which types of social interactions lead to different results in brain and behavior, neurosciences require the social sciences. The social sciences have already made important contributions to neuroscience, among which the behaviorist explanations of human learning are prominent and acknowledged by the most well-known neuroscientists today. Yet neurosciences require more inputs from the social sciences to make meaning of new findings about the brain that deal with some of the most profound human questions. However, when we look at the scientific and theoretical production throughout the history of social sciences, a great fragmentation can be observed, having little interdisciplinarity and little connection between what authors in the different disciplines are contributing. This can be well seen in the field of communicative interaction. Nonetheless, this fragmentation has been overcome via the theory of communicative acts, which integrates knowledge from language and interaction theories but goes one step further in incorporating other aspects of human communication and the role of context. The theory of communicative acts is very informative to neuroscience, and a central contribution in socioneuroscience that makes possible deepening of our understanding of most pressing social problems, such as free and coerced sexual-affective desire, and achieving social and political impact toward their solution. This manuscript shows that socioneuroscience is an interdisciplinary frontier in which the dialogue between all social sciences and all natural sciences opens up an opportunity to integrate different levels of analysis in several sciences to ultimately achieve social impact regarding the most urgent human problems.

Recent scientific literature analyzes the increasing citizens' claim against human references that committed in history racist or sexist aggressions. Although newspapers have clarified that Simone de Beauvoir publicly defended the decriminalization of pedophilia and was condemned and removed from teaching due to her own case, few scientific studies acknowledge it. The scientific literature almost entirely situates her as a reference in feminism, portraying four pillars: 1) she was an example of the struggle for sexual freedom against harassment and abuse; 2) she was an anti-Nazi democrat; 3) she was the creator of modern feminism; 4) current feminists learned feminism from The Second Sex. This paper analyzes to what extent these pillars and the concealment of what she did and defended have been presented to individuals currently working on gender-related issues. The methodology includes an in-depth literature review and 15 communicative interviews with feminists from the second half of the 20th century and from the 21st century trained in different social sciences. Results show that de Beauvoir was presented as one of the main feminist references during most participants' degrees and that they learned about her anti-feminist actions and standpoints in other academic and non-academic dialogic spaces based on scientific evidence.

Leadership has been a topic of much interest in the analysis of social movements. Drawing from qualitative fieldwork, this article analyzes the leadership that was developed by Ester Quintana, who was the last victim to be injured by a rubber bullet during a demonstration in Barcelona (Spain). Together with her friends and other people, Quintana created the Ojo con tu ojo movement (Watch out for your eye). Specifically, the article explores the relevance of Quintana's prior experiences in participatory and dialogic movements and identifies the way that she transferred this knowledge to Ojo con tu ojo as the key to the success of the movement. In only 12 months, Ojo con tu ojo achieved something that other similar social movements in Spain had not achieved in the past: a legislation change that bans the use of rubber bullets by the police. ; El liderazgo ha sido un tema de gran interés en el análisis de los movimientos sociales. Partiendo de un trabajo de campo cualitativo este artículo analiza el liderazgo desarrollado por Ester Quintana, que fue la última víctima en ser herida por una bala de goma durante una manifestación en Barcelona (España). Junto con sus amigos y otras personas, Quintana creó el movimiento Ojo con tu ojo. En particular, el artículo profundiza en la relevancia de las experiencias anteriores de Quintana en movimientos participativos y dialógicos e identifica la forma en que transfirió este conocimiento a Ojo con tu ojo, aspecto que se considera clave para el éxito del movimiento. En sólo 12 meses, Ojo con tu ojo logró algo que otros movimientos sociales similares en España no habían logrado en el pasado: un cambio de legislación que prohibía el uso de balas de goma por parte de la policía.

In December 2020, the Catalan Parliament approved by unanimity the world's first legislation of the concept of Isolating Gender Violence (IGV); in 2021, several parliaments are developing their own legislations. The elaboration of this concept and later this name has been a long and dialogic process among diverse scientists, policymakers, governments, parliaments, victims, survivors, social organizations and citizens. Since 2016, CREA (Community of Research on Excellence for All) has developed a process of elaborating the concept of IGV oriented to obtain the scientific, policy and social impact required to make a key contribution to overcoming gender violence. This process was simultaneous to the elaboration by the same researchers of the criteria of policy and societal impact of the EU's scientific programme of research (Horizon Europe). This paper presents this dialogic research conducted to get the concept and the name IGV and the consequences of this concept along scientific, policy and social impact. The results show that the key for getting the name and the impacts of this scientific robust concept has been three of the main characteristics of the present EU research program Horizon Europe: the priority of social impact, the co-creation of knowledge between scientists and citizens and sustainability.