Suchergebnisse

ABSTRACT: In accordance to the Law Number 25, 2004 on National Development Planning System, regional development is one of the subsystems of such National System. Therefore, regional development must be able to accommodate two important needs, namely superior government and local community needs. In order to get legal certainty in fulfilling the important needs, it is significant to know a juridical basis that can be used as legal protection in deciding regional development planning system, which is conducive to demand aspiration of community and certain laws. It is found that the basis of regional/municipal developments in Aceh province is in accordance to the Law Number 11, 2006 on Aceh Government in relation to the Law Number 25, 2004 on National Development Planning System which has given autority to regional/municipal governments in order to design their regional development planning system by Qanun. Considering the needs, regional or municipal government must follow the rules that stated in the Minister of Internal Affairs's Regulation Number 54, 2010 on Implementation of the Government Regulation Number 8, 2008 on Staging, Compiling System, Controlling, and Evaluation of Regional Development Planning Implementation. The Procedure Of Districts And Municipalities Development Planning In Aceh

This study aims to analyse and final the ideal legal design of the accountability concept to legislative organ in particular Regional House of Representatives (DPRK). One of The authority of DPRK is stated in Article 24 paragraph (1) of Law Number 11 of 2006 on the Government of Aceh states that: "DPRK has the duty and authority to form district/city qanuns which are discussed with the regents/mayors for mutual approval". In that law, that has not been formulated specific forms of accountability of the legislative organ. In genuine, when the DPRK has not carried out its duties and functions effectively in the field of legislation, there has no legal consequences can be given. This research uses normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approach. The outcomes of this study indicate that, the concept of legislative accountability relates to two aspects, that is political and managerial accountability. This accountability should have electoral implications on the performance of the DPRK in carrying out its functions in the field of legislation. The implementation of legislative accountability on the performance of DPRK in the field of legislation has legal and political consequences.

This research investigates the Ombudsman recommendations as the improvement of the maladministration's prevention and the efforts that against government agencies which do not implemented their duties. This juridical-normative research uses four kinds of approach like statute, historical, conceptual and comparative approach. The Ombuds-man's existence after 19 years establishment can be said hasn't fully work as that institution expectation. The responsibility to accept all complaint about maladminis-tration especially in public services just relied only by issues the recommendations about conclusions and suggestions. Ombudsman doesn't has the authority to execute the result of their investigations, so that the rules of recommendation's implementation are weak. The 2016-2020 period's recommendation haven't implemented optimal enough. Therefore, recommendations as the improvement of the maladministration's prevention need to equalizing the perspective and detailed the implementation rules, so that a stronger legal protection about the position and also the function of its recommen-dations can be achieving prosperity.

The consequence of the state of the law is legislation to be an essential instrument in regulating public life. However, in some parts of Indonesia, they can make their regional regulation slightly different from the constitution, wherein this article will focus on Qanun in Aceh Province. The research used in this paper is normative law research. This research used sequential data or library data. Secondary data consists of primary law materials, secondary law materials, and tertiary law materials. The approach method used is the legislative approach and the conceptual approach. The formulation of the problem in this paper is how the standard pattern of consideration in the Law, Regional Regulations, and Qanun is based on legislation. The results show that in the Law in Consideration, Consider using the word "membentuk" or "form" because the law-making institution consists of legislative institutions and executive institutions. Regional regulation considers using the word "menetapkan" or "establish" because the institution that makes local regulations is a local government consisting of elements of local governments and local people's representative councils. This consideration follows Annex II of Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Legislation as amended by Law Number 15 of 2019. However, the Qanun used the word "membentuk" or "form" due following Article 233 paragraph (1) of Law Number 11 the Year 2006 on Aceh Governance and Annex II of Aceh Qanun Number 5 of 2011 on the Procedures for the Establishment of Qanun.

Pencabutan Pasal 67 ayat (2) huruf g pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 51/Puu-Xiv/2016 menyangkut pembatasan hak mantan narapidana untuk mencalonkan diri dalam pemilihan kepala daerah tentu akan berpengaruh pada undang-undang lain. Baik undang-undang yang sudah ada maupun yang akan dibentuk karena berkaitan dengan sifat final dan mengikat pada putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Tahun 2017 muncul undang-undang baru yang memuat kembali pembatasan hak mantan narapidana yaitu Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017. Sehingga menarik diteliti kedudukan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam sistem hukum nasional? dan apakah kekuatan putusan Mahkamah Konstistusi bisa mempengaruhi perundang-undangan lain secara keseluruhan?. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji kedudukan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam sistem hukum nasional dan pengaruh kekuatan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Penelitian yang mencakup asas-asas hukum, sistematika hukum dan taraf sinkronisasi hukum. Sumber data yang digunakan diperoleh dari penelitian perpustakaan serta informasi dari para ahli akan dianalisis dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi merupakan aturan yang memiliki peranan setingkat dengan perundang-undangan untuk dilaksanakan. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi jelas mampu mempengaruhi semua undang-undang, sehingga undang-undang yang memuat prihal yang sama dipastikan tidak memiliki kepastian hukum. Disarankan adanya suatu aturan hukum yang mempertegas teknis implementasi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam peraturan perundang-undangan dan tersedianya suatu wadah pengujian kembali terhadap putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.The revocation of Article 67 paragraph (2) letter g in Law No. 11 of 2006 by the Constitutional Court No. 51 / Puu-Xiv / 2016 concerning restrictions on the rights of former prisoners (ex-convicts) to involve themselves to be the candidate for local election will certainly affect other laws, both the existing laws and laws that will be formed, because they are related to the final and binding characteristic on the decisions of Constitutional Court. In 2017, new law emerged which restated about the restrictions on the rights of former prisoners, namely Law No. 7 of 2017. Thus, it is interesting to investigate the position of the Constitutional Court decision in the national legal system? And whether the power of the Constitutional Court's decision could influence other legislations as a whole or not? This study aims to examine the position of the Constitutional Court decision in the national legal system and the influence of the power of Constitutional Court decision towards the legislation. This study is conducted by using legal research methods of normative juridical. This research covers legal principles, legal systematic and level of legal synchronization. The source of data used in this research is obtained through library research and information from the experts will be analyzed by legislative approach and case approach. The results of this research indicate that the constitutional court decision is a rule that has the same level as the role of legislation to be implemented. The decision of the Constitutional Court is clearly capable of influencing all laws, so that the law that contains the same subject is certain to have no legal certainty. It is suggested that there should be a legal regulation that reinforces the technical implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision in legislation and the availability of a place for re-testing towards the decisions of Constitutional Court.

Perimbangan Dana Otonomi Khusus Aceh antara Provinsi dan kabupaten/kota dalam rangka mempercepat pembangunan di Aceh dalam berbagai sektor akan terwujud apabila pengelolaannya sesuai dengan prinsip kesejahteraan rakyat serta mekanisme pengawasan yang sesuai dengan asas kemanfaatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menjelaskan kesesuaian peraturan perimbangan Dana Otonomi Khusus Aceh dengan prinsip kesejahteraan rakyat serta kemanfaatan mekanisme pengawasan pengalokasian Dana Otonomi Khusus Aceh yang dilakukan Pemerintahan Aceh. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif yang ingin mengidentifikasi dari aspek hukumnya. Data yang digunakan terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Hasil peneltian menunjukkan bahwa pengelolaan Dana Otonomi Khusus Aceh belum memenuhi prinsip Negara kesejahteraan, karna pembagiannya lebih besar untuk Provinsi daripada Kabupaten/Kota. Mekanisme pengawasan terhadap pemanfaatan Dana Otonomi Khusus belum menjamin pemenuhan asas kemanfaatan. Belum adanya Peraturan Gubernur Aceh tentang Satuan Kerja Khusus dan tentang kriteria seleksi program serta kurangnya peran pengawasan dari lembaga khusus Aceh sebagai bentuk pengawasan eksternal. The balance of Aceh Special Autonomy Fund between provinces and districts/cities in order to accelerate development in Aceh in various sectors will be achieved if the management is in accordance with the principle of people's welfare and the supervisory of its mechanism is in line with the principle of expediency. This study aims to identify and explain the appropriateness of the regulation on the balance of the Special Autonomy Fund of Aceh with the principle of people's welfare. In addition to that, this study also wants to assess the usefulness of monitoring mechanism for the allocation of the Special Autonomy Fund of Aceh that is conducted by the Government of Aceh. This research is a normative juridical research that wants to identify from its legal aspect. This research uses three kinds of data: they are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that the management of the Aceh Special Autonomy Fund has not yet fulfilled the basic objectives of the welfare state, because the distribution is greater for the province than the districts/cities. The mechanism of supervision over the utilization of the Special Autonomy Fund has not been in accordance with the principle of expediency. The absence of Aceh Governor Regulation on Unit Special Working and selection criteria program and then lack of Role of Supervision from Aceh special Autonomy institutions as a form external controls.

Permendagri Nomor 95 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perangkat Daerah Aceh tidak mengatur secara detail tentang Satpol PP dan WH. Satpol PP dan WH diatur dengan Qanun Aceh/Qanun Kabupaten/Kota atau Peraturan Gubernur/Peraturan Bupati/Walikota. Karena tidak ada aturan dari pemerintah pusat yang mengatur khusus tentang Satpol PP dan WH, mengakibatkan adanya perbedaaan struktur organisasi tata kerja, penyebutan nomenklatur dan standar operasional prosedur baik provinsi dengan kabupaten/kota maupun antara sesama kabupaten/kota. Untuk itu perlu aturan khusus yang bersifat nasional atau aturan dari pusat yang mengatur tentang Satpol PP dan WH di Aceh. Kepada Pemerintah Aceh dan Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota diharapkan dapat mendorong Pemerintah Pusat melakukan upaya agar melahirkan regulasi yang bersifat nasional yang mampu mengakomodir kepentigan Satpol PP dan WH di Aceh dan terus melakukan review terhadap aturan yang sudah ada maupun yang akan dilahirkan nantinya. The Internal Affair Ministry Regulation Number 95, 2016 regarding Aceh Official Structure does not mention detailed regarding the organizational structure of the Municipal Police and the Sharia Police. The Governor or Head of Region/Major Regulation is only rule on the Municipal Police and the Sharia Police. Hence it has impact on the different structures of working unit organization, the wording and the standard operating procedure either provincial or local or between regions. It is recommended that it is necessary to enact special law, which is nationally ruling on the municipal and Sharia Police in Aceh. In addition, the government of Aceh and the Regional/municipal Government should encourage the central government to enact national laws on the interest of the polices in Aceh and these should be reviewed.

Pasal 71 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur Bupati dan Walikota menjadi Undang-Undang yang mana Gubernur atau Wakil Gubernur, Bupati atau Wakil Bupati, dan Walikota atau Wakil Walikota dilarang melakukan penggantian pejabat 6 (enam) bulan sebelum tanggal penetapan pasangan calon sampai dengan akhir masa jabatan kecuali mendapat persetujuan tertulis dari Menteri. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui pergantian yang dilakukan Gubernur terhadap Pejabat Eselon II Pemerintah Aceh dan mengetahui larangan pergantian pejabat oleh Undang-Undang No 10 Tahun 2016 telah membatasi jabatannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif (yuridis normatif) yakni penelitian yang difokuskan untuk mengkaji penerapan kaidah-kaidah atau norma-norma dalam hukum positif dengan pendekatan yang digunakan adalah Pendekatan Perundang-Undangan, Pendekatan Konseptual dan Pendekatan Kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukan kepala daerah (Gubernur atau Wakil Gubernur, Bupati atau Wakil Bupati, dan Walikota atau Wakil Walikota) dilarang melakukan penggantian pejabat 6 (enam) bulan sebelum tanggal penetapan pasangan calon sampai dengan akhir masa jabatan kecuali mendapat persetujuan tertulis dari Menteri.Article 71 verse (2) of the Act Number 10, 2016 on the change of the Act Number 1, 2015 on the Determination of the Replacement of Government Regulation Number 1, 2014 on the Election of Governor, Head of District and Mayor becomes the Act which is the Governor or vice governor, head of district, or vice of the head of district and major and vice of major is forbidden to replace the high rank official 6 (six) months before the date of its determination of the candidate couples till the end of the power except it has an approval written from the minister, This research aims to know the position changing of echelon II of Aceh Government and to know the ban on the official movement under the Act Number 10, 2016 has limited the power of the Governor that This is juridical normative legal research by focusing on the problems posed in this research, which are on exploring the implementation of the principles or norms in existing laws by applying statutory approach, and it applies conceptual approach by the implementation of conceptual approach. The research shows that the Head of Regions (Governor or vice Governor, Head of District of vice of the Head of District, Major or vice of Major) is forbidden to change high official ranks 6 (six) months before the date of the determination of candidate couple till the end of the power except it has a written approval from the Minister.

Pasal 54 Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika mengamanahkan penyalahguna narkotika direhabilitasi. Kewenangan rehabilitasi dimiliki Badan Narkotika Nasional melalui Perpres Nomor 23 Tahun 2010 Tentang BNN. Selanjutnya BNN membentuk Badan Narkotika dilevel provinsi dan kabupaten/kota. Di Provinsi Aceh, banyak penyalahguna Narkotika telah dijatuhkan sanksi rehabilitasi, namun tempat rehabilitasi belum tersedia. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan keberlakuan hukum. Data diperoleh melalui kepustakaan dan lapangan.Data dianalisis secara kualitatif dan menghasilkan data preskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukan, kepastian penegakan hukum rehabilitasi oleh BNP Aceh belum berjalan, tempat rehabilitasi belum tersedia, kerjasama BNN dengan instansi pemerintah, atau masyarakat, atau keagamaan dan tradisional yang membidangi penanggulangan ketergantungan obat dan rehabilitasi belum dilaksanakan. Disarankan, adanya revisi Perpres Nomor 23 Tahun 2010 terkait penguatan rehabilitasi penyalahguna Narkotika dengan memuat sanksi apabila rehabilitasi tidak dilakukan oleh BNN, BNNP, dan BNN Kab/Kota, serta membuat MoU dengan instansi pemerintah, atau masyarakat, atau keagamaan dan tradisional sebagai tempat rehabilitasi.Article 54 of the Act Number 35, 2009 regarding Narcotics regulates that drug abuser to be rehabilitated. The power to do it is owned by the National Narcotic Board through the Presidential Regulation Number 23, 2010 on the National Narcotic Board. Moreover, the National Narcotic Board is also established in the Province and district Levels. Many drug abusers in Aceh Province are rehabilitated despite the fact that there are no centres for the rehabilitation services. This is juridical empirical research by law enforcement approach. The sources of data are obtained from library and field research. The data collected then analyzed and qualitatively resulting in prescriptive analytical data. The research shows that the certainty of rehabilitation law enforcement by BNP Aceh has not been going well, it has no the rehabilitation centre, there is no cooperation between the BNN and Governmental, community, religious and traditional organizations in preventing drug abuse and no rehabilitation process yet. It is suggested that the Presidential Regulation Number 23, 2010 should be revised relation to empowerment of the rehabilitation and there should be sanction against BNN, BNP, BNP Districts and make MoU between the BNN and Governmental, community, religious and traditional organizations.

ABSTRACT: This research aims to explain the percentage of the contribution of Regional Own Revenues to Local Government Budget. In every establishment of new autonomy region, it is assumed that it would make the community prosperous by exploring and using all available resources. Apart from that, this research also aims to describe the steps that have been taken by the governments in improving Regional Own Revenues. The research finds that the realization of the budget in 2006, 2007 and 2008 shows that the percentage of such contribution to local government budget is very little compared to the contribution comes from other sources. As a result, the income of such areas is mostly depended on the budget given by central government through the balancing budget known as the General Allocation Grant. According to the data of the realization of Regional Own Revenues for the Local Government Budget in 2006, 2007 and 2008, there was no district or municipality which the contribution higher than 10%. The average contribution during the years had been 5.04%. Ideally, all local government budget especially the regular budget, should be similar to the Regional Own Revenues. This lack of contribution indicates that such local governments were really strongly depended on central government in terms of regular budget and budget for development through the balancing budget. In other words, it could be said that the local governments that are unable to balance between the regular budget and the Regional Own Revenues do not deceive to be called as autonomy governments. The Contribution of Regional own Revenues as a Success Indicator of Regional Autonomy's Implementation

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjawab bagaimanakah implementasi Qanun tentang Taman Pendidikan Al-Quran di Kabupaten Simeulu. Apakah yang menjadi kendala yuridis dan sosiologis pemerintah kabupaten dalam melaksanakan qanun tersebut? Qanun ini memerintahkan agar pemerintah kabupaten membangun Taman Pendidikan Al-Quran pada setiap desa. Pemerintah kabupaten juga diperintahkan agar dibangun sarana dan prasarana yang refresentatif. Dengan menggunakan penelitian yuridis empiris, kajian ini menunjukkan bahwa implementasi dari perintah Qanun Nomor 31 Tahun 2012 belum terealisasi dengan baik, karena pembangunan Taman Pendidikan Al-Quran hanya sebagian kecil desa saja. Perintah pembuatan peraturan bupati juga belum terlaksana. Terdapat beberapa kendala tidak jalannya perintah dari qanun tersebut, antara lain peraturan bupati belum dibuat karena ketidaksiapan peraturan yang menjadi acuan dalam menjalankan qanun itu. Tidak adanya kepastian honorarium para tenaga pengajar, menjadi satu kendala tersendiri, sehingga menjadi penyebab tidak jalannya Taman Pendidikan Al-Quran yang sudah ada sebelumnya. The Implementation of Qanun Regarding Taman Pendidikan Al-Qur'an In Simeulue District This study aims to determine the implementation of the Qanun on Al-Quran Education Park in Simeulu District. Will the existence of the qanun create juridical and sociological obstacles in its implementation? This Qanun ordered the district government to build Al-Quran Education Parks in each village and build representative facilities and infrastructure. This research uses empirical juridical methods. The results showed that the implementation of the Qanun No. 31/2012 had not been realized properly, because the construction of the Al-Quran Education Park was only in some villages. The order to make regents' regulations also has not been implemented. There are several obstacles in the non-functioning of the qanun, including the absence of a regent regulation which will become a reference in implementing the qanun. The lack of certainty in funding for teaching staff is also an obstacle in running the Al-Quran Education Park.

Menurut Perpres Nomor 54 Tahun 2010 dan Gubernur Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pembentukan Unit Layanan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Aceh, di dalam pasal 17 disebutkan untuk menjadi pokja harus Aparatur Negeri Sipil (ASN), Sedangkan di dalam Peraturan Gubernur Aceh Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 Tentang Unit Layanan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Aceh tidak diatur tentang hak-hak pegawai pokja, Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui implementasi struktur dan kedudukan kelompok kerja pada unit layanan pengadaan Aceh sudah sesuai dengan Perpres No 54 tahun 2010 berserta perubahannya, untuk mengetahui konsekuensi yuridis jika penempatan kelompok kerja dalam struktur dan kedudukan unit layanan pengadaan Aceh belum sesuai sebagaimana yang diamanahkan oleh Perpres No 54 tahun 2010 berserta perubahannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif (yuridis normatif) dan penelitian hukum empiris (yuridis empiris). Penelitian ini mengunakan data skunder, data primer dan data tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukan Pejabat Unit Layanan Pengadaan atau Pokja ULP seringkali menghadapai permasalahan diantaranya tugas dan tanggung jawab ditempat ASN berkerja dengan pekerjaannya sebagai Pokja ULP yang bersifat ad-hoc (sementara), kuatnya arus intervensi dari pihak-pihak tertuntu yang mengatasnamakan tempat porsenil Pokja selaku ASN bekerja, tidak mendapatkan penilaian kinerja dari ULP sebagaimana yang ditentukan oleh Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 46 Tahun 2011 Tentang Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil bahwa di dalam pasal 1 ayat (3) menyebutkan Prestasi kerja adalah hasil kerja yang dicapai oleh setiap PNS pada satuan organisasi sesuai dengan Sasaran Kerja Pegawai (SKP) dan perilaku kerja.According to Presidential Regulation Number . 54, 2010 and Governor Number 4, 2015 on the Establishment of Aceh Government Goods / Services Procurement Unit, in Article 17 it is mentioned to be a working group for Apparatus Civil Nation (ASN), while in Aceh Governor Regulation Number 4, 2015 The Aceh Government Goods / Service Procurement Unit is not regulated on the rights of the working groups This system is having a lot of weaknesses and it causes the group is at the governmental institutions either in regional or central. This research aims to know the implementation of structure and the position of working group at the unit of Aceh Procurements whether has been in according with the Presidential Regulation Number 54, 2010 together its changes, to know the juridical consequences if the imposition of the working group in the structure and the Aceh's Service Procurement has not been in accordance with the Presidential Regulation Number 54, 2010 together its changes. This is juridical normative legal research. This research applies secondary, primary and tertiary data. The research shows that Official Procurement Unit or the Group of ULP is often facing problems that are their duties and responsibilities at civil servant units with the job on the ULP Group Unit that is temporary, the strengths of intervention from certain parties of the official as the servants do not have the working reviews from ULP as determined by the Indonesian governmental regulation Number 46, 2011 on the Review of Civil Servants Working as started in Article 1 (3) stating that Working Reward is a reward obtained by the civil servants at a organization with the aim of the servant and the working behave and dutie.

ABSTRAK: Pasal 1 Ayat (6) Qanun No. 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Susunan Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Majelis Pendidikan Daerah (MPD) menentukan bahwa MPD sebagai salah satu lembaga penyelenggara pemerintah daerah khususnya di bidang pendidikan yang memberikan pertimbangan dan dukungan kepada pemerintah daerah menyangkut kebijakan pemerintah di bidang pendidikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat sejauhmana peranan Majelis Pendidikan Daerah dalam penyelenggaraan pendidikan Aceh dan konsekuensi hukum terhadap saran, masukan dan pertimbangan dari MPD yang tidak dilaksanakan oleh Pemerintah Aceh. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analitis dengan metode analisis yang digunakan adalah metode analisis kualitatif deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peranan MPD belum berjalan dengan maksimal dikarenakan Pemerintah Aceh masih hanya sebatas menunggu saran, masukan dan pertimbangan di bidang pendidikan dari MPD dan tidak berkewajiban melaksanakan saran tersebut. Konsekuensi hukum terhadap peran MPD yang tidak dijalankan pemerintah Aceh yaitu tidak ada sanksi yang tegas untuk eksekutif dan legislatif jika tidak menjalankan saran dari MPD. The Implementation of Duty and Function of The Province Education Board in the Aceh Governance ABSTRACT: Article 1 (6) of Qanun Number 3, 2006 on the Organization Arrangement and the Organization Structure and Working Structure of the MPD states that the as one of the governmental organization delaing with the education matters in Aceh providing the policy and consideration for government in regard with the education policy. This research aims to explore the extent of the role of theProvince Education Board in developing the education and the legal consequence of not using the advise, consideration, and suggestions of the body by the Government of Aceh. This is descriptive analytical research by analyzing the data qualitativelyThe research shows that the MPD role has not been well conducted as the Government of Aceh is only wait the advise, consideration, and suggestion of the MPD and the Government of Aceh has no obligation to conduct them. The legal consequences of the Government of Aceh dose not impose them in the policy made, is there is no sanction for both executive and legislative parties due to disobeying the advice, consideration and suggestion of the MPD.

ABSTRACT: This research to present whether economic democration as Stated in the 1945 Constotution, Article 33, has been able to be operationalized in to the Qanuns of Aceh for developing production athmosphir. This research refers secondary data, such as primary, secondary, tertiary resources. However emperical data was also used for quiding analysis of the research. Research finding shows that the effort of developing production athmosphir in case of the special authonomy in Aceh through regional and procedures regulation was not effectively achieved. This was indicated by unability of Aceh Government in constructing legislations product either for implementing obligation affairs or section of choices as there were mentioned in law Number 11, 2006 on Government of Aceh. Besides, effort of making debeaurocratization in permit services, it was not regulated yet in Qanun of Aceh. Identification for Qanun of Aceh in Developing Production Athmosphir Toward Economic Democration Based on 1945 Constitution