The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
40 results
Sort by:
When is it morally permissible to engage in self-defense or the defense of others? Jonathan Quong gives an original philosophical account of the central moral principles that should regulate the use of defensive force. The morality of defensive force needs to be understood in the context of a more general account of justice and moral rights.
In: Oxford scholarship online
When is it morally permissible to engage in self-defense or the defense of others? Jonathan Quong gives an original philosophical account of the central moral principles that should regulate the use of defensive force. The morality of defensive force needs to be understood in the context of a more general account of justice and moral rights.
'Liberalism Without Perfection' offers an introduction to the debate between liberal perfectionism and political liberalism. This book is an account and defence of Rawlsian political liberalism, one of the most discussed, but widely misunderstood and criticized theories in contemporary political theory.
'Liberalism Without Perfection' offers an introduction to the debate between liberal perfectionism and political liberalism. This book is an account and defence of Rawlsian political liberalism, one of the most discussed, but widely misunderstood and criticized theories in contemporary political theory
In: The journal of political philosophy, Volume 31, Issue 2, p. 222-232
ISSN: 1467-9760
In: Philosophy and public affairs, Volume 43, Issue 2, p. 144-173
ISSN: 1088-4963
In: Philosophy & public affairs, Volume 43, Issue 2, p. 144-173
ISSN: 0048-3915
In: Filozofija i društvo, Volume 25, Issue 1, p. 96-122
ISSN: 2334-8577
I would like to begin by thanking all the contributors to this symposium,
especially Elvio Baccarini, who hosted the conference at the University of
Rijeka where several of the papers in this symposium were initially
presented. I?ve learned a great deal from these essays, and I?m very
fortunate for my work to be the subject of such careful and perceptive
philosophical attention. Below I offer some replies to each contributor,
though I do not address all the important points raised in each paper.
In: Philosophy and public affairs, Volume 40, Issue 1, p. 45-77
ISSN: 1088-4963
In: Philosophy & public affairs, Volume 40, Issue 1, p. 45-78
ISSN: 0048-3915
In: The journal of political philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 1, p. 64-90
ISSN: 0963-8016
In: J. Quong, LIBERALISM WITHOUT PERFECTION, pp. 1-11, Oxford University Press, 2011
SSRN
In: Journal of Political Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 1, p. 64-89