Suchergebnisse

In the work of Vladimir Soloviev (1853–1900), especially during his first philosophical period, the parallels with the tradition of Neoplatonism have been examined by several researchers. However, the role that specific neoplatonic concepts of Proclean philosophy played for Soloviev's philosophical development, should be examined in more details. The method I follow here is a comparative analysis between three works of Proclus (The of Elements of Theology [Στοιχείωσις θεολογική], Commentary on Alcibiades I [Σχόλια εἰς τον Ἀλκιβιάδην], Commentary on Timaeus [Σχόλια εἰς Τίμαιον]) and La Sophia and Smysl Lyubvi written by Vladimir Soloviev. Moreover, I focus on the only source that we have where Soloviev mentions explicitly to the main concepts of Proclean philosophy. The above methods are proposed in order to analyse crucial concepts in Soloviev's philosophy: love, cosmic unity, and World Soul.

Introduction -- The American Case -- The Dutch Case -- The American and Dutch Cases compared -- The subfederal-federal divide in the United States -- The municipal-central divide in the Netherlands -- The American and Dutch Cases compared -- Conclusions and a new framework of resolution.

Introduction -- The American Case -- The Dutch Case -- The American and Dutch Cases compared -- The subfederal-federal divide in the United States -- The municipal-central divide in the Netherlands -- The American and Dutch Cases compared -- Conclusions and a new framework of resolution.

"On 9 and 10 February 2017, experts from various backgrounds joined in a seminar organized by the Centre for Migration Law, Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence at Radboud University, Nijmegen in the Netherlands. The seminar focused on issues culminating at the intersection of migration, law and religion. We aimed to identify the arguments that drive the discussion in situations presenting a conflict of state law and religious norms in the context of migration. Or, in biblical terms, is there an inherent conflict between Romans 13 (submission to governing authorities) and Matthew 25 (love the stranger), and if so, how is this conflict addressed? In this book, we have included the key contributions to the seminar, thematically organized around four topics: (1) Religious Social Thought; (2) Application of religious freedom; (3) Comparative analysis of religious freedom laws; and (4) Practitioners' views. We hope this book will crystallize the arguments and drive further discussion on the important issues resulting from the interplay of migration, law and religion."--Back cover

On 20 July 2015 the deadline expired for the transposition of the recast Reception Conditions Directive (Directive 2013/33/EU of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast), OJEU 2013 L180/96). The presentations on which this book is based, were originally given during a seminar on the Recast Reception Conditions Directive. This seminar took place at the Centre for Migration Law (Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence), Faculty of Law of the Radboud University Nijmegen, on Tuesday 8 December 2015. In light of the very substantial level of interest, we publish a book on the results of this seminar in order to enable those who were not able to attend to benefit from the wealth of knowledge and information which was shared. The book is divided in two sections. The first section deals with the central themes and the problem issues of the recast Reception Conditions Directive. The second part of the book focuses on the implementation of the recast Reception Conditions Directive in a selected number of Member States. This book offers insight in all the different aspects of the recast Reception Conditions Directive --Back cover