Suchergebnisse

1. Introduction 1. - 2. National Security and the Efficacy of Drone Warfare 19. - 3. Targeted Killing and the Legality of Drone Warfare 51. - 4. Remote Killing and the Ethics of Drone Warfare 79. - 5. Public Policy, Privacy, and Drone Technology 98. - 6. Conclusion 120

http://dx.doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.46011 ; The rise of China's economic and military power is transforming global politics while U.S. strategic interests are re-balancing toward Asia. Meanwhile, tensions over maritime boundaries and island claims within the region are punctuated by police and military stand-offs in the East and South China Seas. This paper considers the discourse surrounding the dispute over sovereignty in the South China Sea. It also examines the roles international law, multilateralism, and traditional diplomacy play in the conflict, and how it serves as a test case for China's future diplomacy and traditional norms of non-interference and a peaceful rise. Finally, the paper suggests pathways toward conflict resolution of the immediate disputes, including de-territorialized and de-nationalized ideas of possession when it applies to contested yet uninhabited maritime frontiers. ; Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nin stratejik çıkarları Asya'ya yönelirken, Çin'in ekonomik ve askeri gücü küresel politikayı dönüştürmektedir. Bu arada, Doğu ve Güney Çin Denizlerindeki sınırlar ve adalar üzerindeki ihtilaflar, bölgedeki polis ve orduları karşı karşıya getirmektedir. Bu makale, Güney Çin Denizi'ndeki egemenlik meseleleri üzerine olan söylemleri konu etmektedir. Makale uluslararası hukuk, çoktaraflılık ve geleneksel diplomasinin ihtilaf çerçevesinde oynadıkları rollere değinmekte ve ihtilafın gerek Çin'in gelecekteki diplomasisi gerekse geleneksel normları olan müdahale etmeme ve barışçıl yükseliş için nasıl bir test vakası olduğuna işaret etmetedir. Çalışma son olarak çatışmaların çözümü için öneriler getirerek, ihtilaflı ancak üzerinde yerleşim olmayan deniz sınırları için teritoryal ve ulusal olmayan aidiyet fikirleri üzerinde duracaktır.

This article unpacks the contemporary relationship among racial, cultural, and civic notions of the concept of the Chinese nation (Zhonghua Minzu 中华民族), specifically examining Han (汉), Hua (华), and Zhongguo (中国) as categories representative of each identity marker. It examines the relationship between Han and Chinese identities and how people from multiple ethnic identities relate to the idea of the Chinese nation. Han identity is often fused with the larger Chinese identity that in the past conflated the two, sometimes leading to Han chauvinism and a problematic relationship with the state for non‐Han people. Government orthodoxy that emphasizes civic harmony and minimizes national distinction is challenged by exclusive ethnic and racial conceptions. A classical cultural understanding of Chinese identity may be more inclusive yet is undermined by the ongoing territorializing of Chinese nationalism and myth making of Chinese identity in ethno‐national rhetoric.