Suchergebnisse

The article analyses the harmonisation framework under TFEU of the Directive 2008/99/EC and the possible difficulties in implementing the document in national legislation. An inadequately chosen legitimate purpose and the lack of the prioritisation of environmental crime in the Member States result in harmonisation and implementation problems related to issues of the definitions of the offences, their differentiation and compliance with fundamental principles of the law.

The article analyses the harmonisation framework under TFEU of the Directive 2008/99/EC and the possible difficulties in implementing the document in national legislation. An inadequately chosen legitimate purpose and the lack of the prioritisation of environmental crime in the Member States result in harmonisation and implementation problems related to issues of the definitions of the offences, their differentiation and compliance with fundamental principles of the law. ; Šiame straipsnyje analizuojama, kaip harmonizavimo pagrindas pagal SESV galėjo paveikti Direktyvos 2008/99/EB derinimą ir kokius šio dokumento įgyvendinimo sunkumus tai galėjo lemti. Netinkamas harmonizavimo pagrindo (teisėto tikslo) parinkimas ir nusikaltimų aplinkai prioretizavimo trūkumas valstybėse lemia derinimo ir įgyvendinimo problemas, susijusias su nusikalstamų veikų apibrėžimų, jų diferenciacija ir suderinamumu su pagrindiniais teisės principais.

The article analyses the harmonisation framework under TFEU of the Directive 2008/99/EC and the possible difficulties in implementing the document in national legislation. An inadequately chosen legitimate purpose and the lack of the prioritisation of environmental crime in the Member States result in harmonisation and implementation problems related to issues of the definitions of the offences, their differentiation and compliance with fundamental principles of the law.

The article analyses the harmonisation framework under TFEU of the Directive 2008/99/EC and the possible difficulties in implementing the document in national legislation. An inadequately chosen legitimate purpose and the lack of the prioritisation of environmental crime in the Member States result in harmonisation and implementation problems related to issues of the definitions of the offences, their differentiation and compliance with fundamental principles of the law.

The article analyses the harmonisation framework under TFEU of the Directive 2008/99/EC and the possible difficulties in implementing the document in national legislation. An inadequately chosen legitimate purpose and the lack of the prioritisation of environmental crime in the Member States result in harmonisation and implementation problems related to issues of the definitions of the offences, their differentiation and compliance with fundamental principles of the law.

This publication contains the proceedings of the 9th European Criminal Law Academic Network (ECLAN) PhD Seminar on European Criminal Justice "The significance of EU criminal law in the 21st century: the need for further harmonisation or new criminal policy", hosted by the Vilnius University Faculty of Law. Participants of the event presented their research in various criminal law fields related to the EU substantive criminal law and its national implementation, combating organised crime and the EPPO, criminal policy and human rights and cooperation in criminal matters and other legal instruments. Thus, the publication provides short papers of the main ideas and conclusions of several speakers' presentations.