Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Fundus-Bücher 58/60
In: Archiv sozialistischer Literatur 25
In: Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch Wissenschaft 831
In: Werkausgabe
In: Sozialer Fortschritt: unabhängige Zeitschrift für Sozialpolitik = German review of social policy, Band 73, Heft 3, S. 221-249
ISSN: 1865-5386
In: Human rights review: HRR, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 381-382
ISSN: 1874-6306
In: Political studies review, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 456-474
ISSN: 1478-9302
What are the driving factors for foreign direct investment liberalization in formerly communist countries? Previous research explains foreign direct investment liberalization as a function of the intensification of international commerce and democratization; however, the likes of China, Cuba, North Korea, and Vietnam hardly fit into this narrative. The following contribution makes a theoretical argument about the causes of foreign direct investment liberalization in communist authoritarian regimes with highly centralized and closed economies. We argue that foreign direct investment liberalization is caused by external shocks materializing in policy adaptations. The degree of foreign direct investment liberalization depends on the balance of power between actors who favor liberalization and actors who stand to profit from rent-seeking economies. The relative power of both factions determines the magnitude and type of foreign direct investment liberalization. We test this theoretical argument using case studies, which include China and Vietnam as representatives of gradual transitions and Cuba and North Korea as representatives of traditional rent-seeking economies.
In: Human rights review: HRR, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 243-265
ISSN: 1874-6306
AbstractThe discourse on economic integration with authoritarian regimes has evolved as a key topic throughout the different disciplines of social sciences. Are sanctions and boycotts effective methods to incentivize human rights improvements? To analyze this question, we focus on the situation in China's Xinjiang province from 2010 to 2019. In this paper, we discuss the relevance of human rights as an ethical norm within business ethics and international law. We evaluate the ongoing processes in Xinjiang from this perspective and scrutinize the interests of major players in the region, including the Central Government of the People's Republic of China, Xinjiang's local government, and enterprises involved in the region. Following this, we discuss which economic measures will improve the human rights situation and how these measures contribute to an improvement of the situation.
In: JOEP-D-21-00658
SSRN
In: Philosophy & technology, Band 35, Heft 2
ISSN: 2210-5441
Abstract
The German Act on Autonomous Driving constitutes the first national framework on level four autonomous vehicles and has received attention from policy makers, AI ethics scholars and legal experts in autonomous driving. Owing to Germany's role as a global hub for car manufacturing, the following paper sheds light on the act's position within the ethical discourse and how it reconfigures the balance between legislation and ethical frameworks. Specifically, in this paper, we highlight areas that need to be more worked out in the future either through ethical conventions, corporate measures or legal measures and examine how the law can be incorporated into the existing discourse on the regulation of technologies. Based on this examination, we derive implications for future discourse and elaborate on companies' responsibilities in developing autonomous driving technologies in an ethical sense.
The German Act on Autonomous Driving constitutes the first national framework on level four autonomous vehicles and has received attention from policy makers, AI ethics scholars and legal experts in autonomous driving. Owing to Germany's role as a global hub for car manufacturing, the following paper sheds light on the act's position within the ethical discourse and how it reconfigures the balance between legislation and ethical frameworks. Specifically, in this paper, we highlight areas that need to be more worked out in the future either through ethical conventions, corporate measures or legal measures and examine how the law can be incorporated into the existing discourse on the regulation of technologies. Based on this examination, we derive implications for future discourse and elaborate on companies' responsibilities in developing autonomous driving technologies in an ethical sense.
BASE
In: Wirtschaftsethik in der Globalisierten Welt Ser
In: Wirtschaftsethik in der globalisierten Welt
Chapter I Business Ethics for the Digital Era -- Chapter II Digitalization and Business Ethics for a Cyber Peace -- Chapter III Artificial General Intelligence in Human Interface – Its Impact on Society and Human Being -- Chapter IV Digital Communication in and beyond Organizations – A Path to Hyperinclusion -- Chapter V Categorization of Risk Management: Clinical Research and Global Justice -- Chapter VI Digitization, Unemployment, and Distributive Justice -- Chapter VII Use of Soviet constructivism experience in urban planning of a contemporary city for digitized society -- Chapter VIII Outline of Ethical Issues Concerning Government, Business and Information Technologies.
In: Business and Society Review, Band 128, Heft 3, S. 417-435
ISSN: 1467-8594
AbstractOrganizational integrity is a key concept with and through which a company can assume its responsibility for ethical and societal issues. It is a basic premise for sustainable corporate success, as ethical risks ultimately become economic risks for a company. Recent research shows the potential of integrity‐based governance models to reduce corporate risks and to improve business performance. However, companies are not yet able to assess nor evaluate their level of organizational integrity in a sound and systematic way. We aim to develop a theoretical model as a basis for the measurement of organizational integrity by conceptualizing the construct and sizing the theoretical model's scope. We suggest that the theoretical model follows a holistic approach and involves three types of dimensions: prerequisite dimensions, independent dimensions, and dependent dimensions. The organizational integrity triad—consisting of active commitments to self‐imposed norms and principles, their transparent institutionalization into corporate processes and structures, and their implementation into action—plays a key role in this context.