Since the 2004, election of the president and vice president made directly by the people. Normatively, Indonesia has been striving for election of the president and vice president are more democratic, as reflected through the freedom and the involvement of a political party or coalition of political parties contesting the election to carry the presidential and vice presidential candidates meet all the requirements specified in the legislation. However, in practice the presidential election in 2004 and 2009, found several problems. This paper is intended to identify a number of election issues, once initiated the implementation of a formula for the realization of a more democratic election and aspirative.
This study aims to assess and analyze the practice of monitoring the current draft legislation and regulation enactment of Law No. 32 of 2004 in conjunction with Law No. 28 of 2009, and efforts to reorganize the (reconstruction) testing system suitable draft legislation and regulations mandated by the Constitution of 1945. The method used in this research is juridical empirical data sources focusing on primary data supported secondary data. Collecting data through interviews and field observationsare supported by the literature study. Based on the results of research that reviewing local regulations and local regulation bill containproblematic, that the level of normative and practical. At thenormative level, there isa difference between setting the cancellation regulations of Law No.32 of 2004 juncto Law No. 23 of 2014by theArticle 24A of the 1945 Constitution. Inpractical level the problematic appears with regard to the scope of the evaluation of draft legislation, the standard of review, the legalform of the review results, follow-upreview, and implementation of filing and testing.Therefore, the system needs to reconstruction of reviewing local regulations and local regulations bill to complywiththe mandate of the 1945 Constitution. Reconstruction concerning the types of review of the local regulations and local regulation bill, and procedural law in local regulation review.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis praktik pengawasan raperda dan perda saat berlakunya UU No. 32 Tahun 2004 juncto UU No. 28 Tahun 2009, dan upaya untuk mengatur kembali (rekonstruksi) sistem pengujian raperda dan perda yang sesuai amanat UUD 1945. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis empiris dengan sumber data berfokus pada data primer yang didukung data sekunder. Pengumpulan data melalui wawancara danpengamatan lapangan yang didukung dengan studi kepustakaan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian bahwa pengujian rancangan peraturan daerah dan peraturan daerah mengandung problematika, baik padatataran normatif dan praksis. Pada tataran normatif, ada perbedaan pengaturan pengujian dan pembatalan perda antara UU No. 32 Tahun 2004 juncto UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 dengan Pasal 24A UUD NRI 1945. Pada tataran praksis problematika berkenaan dengan ruang lingkup evaluasi raperda, batu uji, bentuk hukum hasil pengujian, tindak lanjut pengujian, dan waktu pengajuan dan pelaksanaan pengujian.Oleh karenanya dibutuhkan rekonstruksi sistem pengujian raperda dan perda agar sesuaidengan amanat UUD 1945. Rekonstruksi berkenaan dengan jenis pengujian raperda dan perda serta hukum acara pengujian.
The authority of the Constitutional Court is often limited only to the judicial review of statutory products, not practice. The method used for this research is normative legal research using a conceptual approach, legislation, and comparisons. This legal research aims to examine the implementation of constitutional complaint schemes in various countries while reviewing the inherent authority of the Constitutional Court in reviewing constitutional complaint cases with the object of court decisions. The results show that the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea has many similarities with the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia; at the same time, the German Constitutional Court gives rights to individuals, communions, and associations to file a constitutional complaint and the United States Supreme Court establishes several criteria for legal standing for parties who make constitutional complaints. Then, the Constitutional Court has the authority to decide on constitutional objections, including court decisions, considering the court's decision is analogous to the law itself. Furthermore, based on constitutionalism, the constitutional complaint is the inherent authority of the Constitutional Court. KEYWORDS: Constitutional Court, Constitutional Complaint, Court Rulings, Inherent Power.
Tulisan ini hendak mengkaji pemanfaatan E-Government (Electronic Government) dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah di Indonesia dengan menggunakan perspektif yuridis. berupa pengaturan yang sudah ada pada tingkat nasional atau pusat serta saran tindak bagi daerah dalam rangka mengimplementasikan E-Government, terutama pijakan awalnya berupa suatu kerangka hukum (legal framework). Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan teoretis-konseptual (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach).
Artikel ini mendeskripsikan bahwa Tiga Gerakan Moral (Gerakan Kembali ke Kebun, Gerakan Hidup Hemat dan Gerakan Desa Aman) yang dicanangkan oleh PemerintahDaerah bersama komponen-komponen masyarakat adat di Kabupaten Sumba Tengah merupakan hukum adat. Tiga Gerakan Moral sebagai hukum adat didasarkan pada pemenuhan unsur-unsur hukum adat yaitu adanya kaidah, masyarakat, sanksi, dan penegak sanksi. Selain itu, artikel ini juga memberikan argumentasi bahwa TigaGerakan Moral sejatinya bertujuan mencapai atau mewujudkan kesejahteraan bagi masyarakat Sumba Tengah. Hal ini disebabkan karena melalui Tiga Gerakan Moral,Pemerintah bersama masyarakat bermaksud menyelesaikan persoalan mendasar yang ada yaitu kecenderungan mengabaikan penggarapan lahan kebun, kecenderunganmenafsirkan nilai budaya secara kurang tepat sehingga bermuara pada gaya hidup hedonistik, serta gangguan keamanan yang masih cukup tinggi.This article argues that the Three Moral Movements (Back to Field Movement, the Safe Village Movement and the Frugal Lifestyle Movement) launched by the local government and prominent figures of traditional community in Central Sumba Regency meets the qualification of customary law. The categorization of the Three Moral Movements as customary law is based on the fact that the movements consist of customary norms, have been implemented among the traditional community members, and equipped with sanctions as well as the law enforcement elements. Additionally, this article also argues that the Three Moral Movements aims to achieve prosperity for the people of Central Sumba. This is because through the Three Moral Movements, the Government along with the community intends to resolve the existing fundamental problems, which are the tendency of ignoring the cultivation of idle fields, the tendency to mistakenly interpret cultural values that leads to a hedonistic lifestyle, as well as significant security issues.
