Suchergebnisse
Filter
30 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Politics, economics, and the general welfare
In: Scott, Foreman's American government readings series
Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy.Randall B. Ripley , Grace A. Franklin
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 39, Heft 3, S. 827-828
ISSN: 1468-2508
Urban Politics and Decentralization: The Case of General Revenue Sharing. By David A. Caputo and Richard L. Cole. (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, D. C. Heath and Co., 1974. Pp. xix, 180. $15.00.)
In: American political science review, Band 71, Heft 2, S. 693-694
ISSN: 1537-5943
The Pro and Con Arguments
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 419, Heft 1, S. 23-35
ISSN: 1552-3349
After a brief review of the forces which shaped the general revenue sharing legislation, this article investigates thoroughly various pro and con arguments about the program. While there may be a variety of theoretical "pro" arguments, the primary argument in favor of general revenue sharing is that is is politically popular with the public officials who are recipients of the funds. This article also explores the arguments that general rev enue sharing leads to increased citizen participation and fewer administrative requirements for recipient units, and that it increases the strength of the central administration. It urges caution in interpreting the preliminary research results which are available. On the "con" side, it considers a variety of theoretical arguments, but the main emphasis must be on the inequities in the existing legislation. These include the reduction in categorical aid programs, the failure to provide adequately for the largest cities, the inapplicability of fiscal crisis arguments, and the absence of important "side benefits"—institution building, for example—from general revenue sharing legislation. Finally, there is a discussion of the discriminatory provisions and enforcement procedures of the legislation. The dilemma which revenue sharing and the former categorical grant programs were designed to meet is best resolved by strengthening and expanding the block grant approach to federal aid.
ANDREAS G. PAPANDREOU. Paternalistic Capitalism. Pp. 190. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1972. $7.50
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 405, Heft 1, S. 234-235
ISSN: 1552-3349
Regulatory administration: are we getting anywhere? a symposium
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 32, S. 283-310
ISSN: 0033-3352
Science Policy and the University.Harold Orlans
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 32, Heft 1, S. 193-194
ISSN: 1468-2508
Government Contracting and Technological Change. By Clarence H. Danhoff. (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1968. Pp. 472, $8.75.)
In: American political science review, Band 63, Heft 2, S. 579-580
ISSN: 1537-5943
Policy Issues: The Interaction of Substance & Process
In: Polity, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 35-51
ISSN: 1744-1684
$17 Billion in Search of a Policy
In: Bulletin of the atomic scientists, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 33-36
ISSN: 1938-3282
R & D: Suggestions for an Allocations Framework
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 104
ISSN: 1540-6210
EDWARD S. FLASH, JR. Economic Advice and Presidential Leadership: The Council of Economic Advisers. Pp. x, 382. New York: Columbia University Press, 1965. $8.95
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 366, Heft 1, S. 163-163
ISSN: 1552-3349
Mr. Martin's Sacred Cow
In: Challenge: the magazine of economic affairs, Band 14, Heft 5, S. 22-40
ISSN: 1558-1489