Suchergebnisse

Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronquist is a widespread noxious weed with high fecundity, associated with no-till systems such as vineyards and other perennial crops in Mediterranean climates. Seeds germinate in staggered flushes, which leads to a great variation in the growth stage between individuals in the same field, and chemical control becomes challenging. Besides, Conyza species have evolved resistance to herbicides worldwide, particularly to glyphosate. Even though tillage is expected to provide weed-free fields, it negatively affects vineyards, causing erosion, loss of soil structure and a reduction in organic matter or vine growth (shallow roots can be affected), among other effects. Fuel consumption of this management is also very high because recurrent interventions of in-row tiller are required. In this context, bioherbicides, defined as environmentally friendly natural substances intended to reduce weed populations, are a potential tool for integrated weed management (IWM). In this work, the herbicidal effect of the following six products is tested on a glyphosate-resistant C. bonariensis population present in commercial vineyards: T1, mixture of acetic acid 20% and the fertilizer N32; T2, mixture of potassium metabisulfite and pelargonic acid 31%; T3, pelargonic acid 68%; T4, humic-fulvic acid 80%; T5, hydroxy phosphate complex; and T6, potassium metabisulfite. The results showed high field efficacy for T1 and T4 (>80% biomass reduction). For the rest of the products, high efficacy was obtained only in dose-response greenhouse experiments. The present work demonstrates the potential of certain bioherbicide compounds to manage herbicide-resistant weed species, such as C. bonariensis. Therefore, bioherbicides could be successfully incorporated into vineyards for IWM. ; This research was funded by the Spanish State Research Agency, grant number AGL2017-83325-C4-2-R, and by the MACMHER "Grups Operatius" promoted by Departament of Agriculture of the Catalan Government (DARP) in 2018. The first author ...

Los sistemas agrícolas son una de las vías preferentes de introducción de especies vegetales exóticas y la perturbación asociada a estos hábitats ha favorecido muchos casos de invasión. Sin embargo, el estudio de este proceso ha recibido menor interés que en sistemas naturales o seminaturales. Este hecho parece deberse a una desigual visión acerca del impacto causado en el equilibrio ecológico del sistema. En el presente artículo se realiza una revisión de las causas intrínsecas que favorecen los procesos de invasión y los rasgos que definen la invasibilidad de los sistemas agrícolas. Como ejemplo se utilizan los diferentes casos registrados en los últimos 40 años en Cataluña y sobre los que se dispone de amplia información. Se exponen las diferentes tipologías de cultivo preferentemente sensibles a acoger malas hierbas exóticas y las características ambientales y estrategias de manejo a las cuales estas especies han mostrado mejor adaptación. Los principales escenarios agrícolas que se definen son: campos de arroz, campos de maíz y otros cultivos anuales de regadío, campos de alfalfa y cultivos leñosos de regadío. Se recogen también las distintas disposiciones legislativas existentes al respecto a nivel de Cataluña, exponiendo de manera crítica, las diferencias de criterio utilizadas entre las listas de alerta publicadas a nivel europeo, nacional y autonómico, respecto a las especies que constituyen problema o amenaza en los campos de cultivo. ; Agricultural systems are one of the preferred ways of introduction of exotic weed species and the disturbance associated with these habitats has favored many cases of invasion. However, the study of this process has received less interest than in natural or semi‑natural systems. This fact seems to be due to an unequal view about the impact caused on the ecological equilibrium of the system. In this article, a review of the intrinsic causes that favor the weed invasion processes and the features that define the invasiveness of agricultural systems is carried out. As an example, the different cases registered in the last 40 years in Catalonia, and for which a lot of information is available, are used. The different crop typologies preferably sensitive to host exotic weeds and the environmental characteristics and management strategies to which these species have shown better adaptation are exposed. The main agricultural scenarios that are defined are: rice fields, corn fields and other annual irrigated crops, alfalfa fields and irrigated orchards. It also includes the different existing legislative rules in this regard at the level of Catalonia, exposing critically, the differences in criteria used between the alert lists published at European, national and regional level, with respect to the species that constitute a problem or threat in the farmlands.

Nest densities of harvester ants (Messor barbarus) are high in rain-fed cereal fields in north-eastern Spain where the ants remove large quantities of seeds, contributing to reductions in weed populations. The distribution of harvester ant nests within a field can influence the effectiveness of ants as weed seed predators because areas with low ant nest density have lower weed seed removal rates. Tillage can disturb or even kill ant colonies and may be an important factor explaining the distribution of nests within fields. During the summers of 2011 - 2013, the number of nests in a 50 x 50 m area in 4 tilled and 3 no-till fields were counted. Tilled fields were disturbed twice a year, in November before cereal seeding and in July, after cereal harvest, whereas no-till fields had no soil disturbance. Ant nests were evenly spaced in no-till fields whereas nests were randomly distributed in tilled fields. Our results provide evidence that no-till in cereal fields promotes a more even distribution of M. barbarus nests, which should result in higher and more regular levels of weed seed predation across the field. ; We would like to thank Sergi Royan and Nuria Moix for their help in locating and counting ant nests for this study. We would also like to thank the farmers Xavier Llobet, Alejandro Pollino, Jaume Ros, and Fran X. Albareda for allowing us to asses nest density in their fields. This study was partially funded by projects AGL2010-22084 and AGL2007-60828 from the Spanish National R&D program, and the Department of Agriculture, Food and environment of the Catalan Government (DAAM) (2012 AGEC 00040 Ajuts a la producción agraria ecològica).

Amaranthus palmeri is the most prominent invasive weed in agricultural land from North America, partly due to its propensity to evolve resistance to multiple herbicide sites of action. In the last two decades, reports of this species have increased throughout the American continent and occasionally in other continents. In 2007, A. palmeri populations were found in three localities in northeastern Spain, and they are still present today. To determine whether these three populations resulted from a common or independent introduction events¿and when and from where they could have occurred¿research was carried out aiming to characterize the resistance profile and mechanisms to 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase-and acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides and to analyze the relationship between these three populations using inter simple sequence repeat DNA fingerprinting. Dose-response trials confirmed that the three populations were susceptible to glyphosate but resistant to nicosulfuron-methyl. Resistance to ALS inhibitors was due to several amino acid substitutions in positions Pro197, Trp574 and Ser653. Moreover, the substitutions Ser653Ile and Pro197Thr are described for the first time in this species. At field-labeled rates, all populations were fully controlled with alternative herbicides with other sites of action. Amaranthus palmeri individuals were clustered in three groups based on unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean analysis, which corresponded to the three sampled populations, with a 67% of genetic relationship among them. Considering this high genetic variability and the different positions and amino acid substations found between populations, it was hypothesized that different colonization events occurred from the American continent probably prior to the introduction of glyphosate resistant crops. Prevention from new introductions is warranted because new herbicide resistance traits could arrive, complicating the management of this invasive weed species, while managing or eradicating the already established populations. ; This work was funded by Spanish Government through the project AGL2017-83325-C4-2-R (AEI/FEDER/UE). Joel Torra acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (grant Ramon y Cajal RYC2018-023866-I).

Transdisciplinary weed research (TWR) is a promising path to more effective management of challenging weed problems. We define TWR as an integrated process of inquiry and action that addresses complex weed problems in the context of broader efforts to improve economic, environmental and social aspects of ecosystem sustainability. TWR seeks to integrate scholarly and practical knowledge across many stakeholder groups (e.g. scientists, private sector, farmers and extension officers) and levels (e.g. local, regional and landscape). Furthermore, TWR features democratic and iterative processes of decision-making and collective action that aims to align the interests, viewpoints and agendas of a wide range of stakeholders. The fundamental rationale for TWR is that many challenging weed problems (e.g. herbicide resistance or extensive plant invasions in natural areas) are better addressed systemically, as a part of broad-based efforts to advance ecosystem sustainability, rather than as isolated problems. Addressing challenging weed problems systemically can offer important new leverage on such problems, by creating new opportunities to manage their root causes and by improving complementarity between weed management and other activities. While promising, this approach is complicated by the multidimensional, multilevel, diversely defined and unpredictable nature of ecosystem sustainability. In practice, TWR can be undertaken as a cyclic process of (i) initial problem formulation, (ii) 'broadening' of the problem formulation and recruitment of stakeholder participants, (iii) deliberation, negotiation and design of an action agenda for systemic change, (iv) implementation action, (v) monitoring and assessment of outcomes and (vi) reformulation of the problem situation and renegotiation of further actions. Notably, 'purposive' disciplines (design, humanities and arts) have central, critical and recurrent roles in this process, as do integrative analyses of relevant multidimensional and multilevel factors, via multiple natural and social science disciplines. We exemplify this process in prospect and retrospect. Importantly TWR is not a replacement for current weed research; rather, the intent is to powerfully leverage current efforts.

1. Increasing landscape heterogeneity by restoring semi-natural elements to reverse farmland biodiversity declines is not always economically feasible or acceptable to farmers due to competition for land. We hypothesized that increasing the hetero-geneity of the crop mosaic itself, hereafter referred to as crop heterogeneity, can have beneficial effects on within-field plant diversity .2. Using a unique multi-country dataset from a cross-continent collaborative project covering 1,451 agricultural fields within 432 landscapes in Europe and Canada, we assessed the relative effects of compositional and configurational crop heteroge-neity on within-field plant diversity components. We also examined how these relationships were modulated by the position within the field. 3. We found strong positive effects of configurational crop heterogeneity on within-field plant alpha and gamma diversity in field interiors. These effects were as high as the effect of semi-natural cover. In field borders, effects of crop heterogeneity were limited to alpha diversity. We suggest that a heterogeneous crop mosaic may overcome the high negative impact of management practices on plant diversity in field interiors, whereas in field borders, where plant diversity is already high, landscape effects are more limited. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that increasing configurational crop heterogeneity is beneficial to within-field plant diversity. It opens up a new effec-tive and complementary way to promote farmland biodiversity without taking land out of agricultural production. We therefore recommend adopting manipulation of crop heterogeneity as a specific, effective management option in future policy measures, perhaps adding to agri-environment schemes, to contribute to the con-servation of farmland plant diversity. ; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; German Ministry of Research and Education; Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Grant/Award Number: ANR-11-EBID-0004; Canada Foundation for Innovation; German Research Foundation; Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; French National Research Agency, Grant/Award Number: ANR-11-EBID-0004; UK Government Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Environment Canada (EC)