Suchergebnisse

The year 1965 went down in the history of the Soviet Union as the year of economic reforms, which aroused an unprecedented interest in the scientific community in the theory and practice of public administration and its legal regulation. Soviet scientists were given a global task - to determine the scientific ways of developing Soviet public administration in the new economic conditions. A team of scientists from the Institute of State and Law of the USSR Academy of Sciences also joined in the solution of this problem, as a result of which in 1968 the Nauka publishing house published a collective monograph "Scientific foundations of public administration in the USSR". Doctor of law, professor M.I. Piskotin took an active part in the preparation of this work. His great scientific heritage continues to influence the development of domestic legal science.

In modern conditions, the importance of the activities of the Prosecutor's office in solving the entire complex of tasks of state and social development of the country is increasing. One of the most important activities of the Prosecutor's office is the activity covered by the concept of "general supervision of the Prosecutor's office", which is currently presented mainly as a scientific category, which, however, has not received its legislative consolidation. In order to get a more complete picture of the general supervision of the Prosecutor's office in the historical and legal aspect, it is proposed to consider the results of a discussion on some issues of general supervision of the prosecutor's office held at the Institute of Law of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR and the Military Law Academy of the Red Army in 1945, where the issues of the correlation between the supervisory activities of the Prosecutor's office and state control; the powers of the prosecutor in the field of general supervision; forms of prosecutorial response; requirements imposed on employees of the Prosecutor's office; and also raised the question of the existence of general supervision of the Prosecutor's office in the military, especially in wartime conditions.

The review not only draws attention to the results of the first monographic medical and legal study of the patterns of lethality development, but also evaluates them from the standpoint of the development of jurisprudence in the Russian Federation. The monograph makes a not unsuccessful attempt to correlate several terms: "lethality", "vitality", "mortality", "mortality". At the same time, a fundamentally important provision is substantiated: the inadmissibility of identifying the terms "lethality" and "mortality". This made it possible to avoid the traditional approach in covering mortality. In addition, the use of the term "vitality" presupposes the presence of thanatological education of people in educational institutions in the universities of the country, to which clearly insufficient attention is paid

The review of V.N. Galuzo's work "Theoretical justification of law enforcement in the Russian Federation: state and prospects of development" not only draws attention to the results of the first monographic historical and legal study of the laws of law enforcement development in the Russian Federation (since 1991), but also evaluates them from the standpoint of modern development of jurisprudence

The review not only draws attention to the results of a monographic study of the patterns of state and law development in the Russian Federation (since 1991) (on the example of the Prosecutor's office), but also evaluates them.