Attitudes and Intentions Regarding Abortion Provision Among Medical School Students in South Africa
In: International perspectives on sexual & reproductive health, Band 38, Heft 3, S. 154-163
ISSN: 1944-0405
4 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International perspectives on sexual & reproductive health, Band 38, Heft 3, S. 154-163
ISSN: 1944-0405
Provision of safe, voluntary, termination of pregnancy (TOP) in South Africa is challenged by an insufficient number of TOP-trained clinicians. Medical students' understanding of TOP legality and their attitudes toward TOP training are indicators for future service provision. We administered a 63-item questionnaire to explore these issues at the University of Cape Town and Walter Sisulu University. Ordinary least squares regression assessed predictors of TOP legislation knowledge and training attitudes. Results: Of 1308 students, 95% knew that TOP was legal in South Africa, but few (27%) understood the specific provisions of the legislation beyond 13 weeks' gestation. Sixty-three percent desired more information about TOP. In multivariate models, female, white and sexually experienced students and students more advanced in school had better legislation knowledge (all p <.01). Attending religious services regularly (p <.01) was associated with lack of support for TOP training, whereas being in a relationship (p <.01) was associated with support for TOP training.
BASE
In: Du bois review: social science research on race, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 159-177
ISSN: 1742-0598
AbstractWhile it is clear that self-reported racial/ethnic discrimination is related to illness, there are challenges in measuring self-reported discrimination or unfair treatment. In the present study, we evaluate the psychometric properties of a self-reported instrument across racial/ethnic groups in a population-based sample, and we test and interpret findings from applying two different widely-used approaches to asking about discrimination and unfair treatment. Even though we found that the subset of items we tested tap into a single underlying concept, we also found that different groups are more likely to report on different aspects of discrimination. Whether race is mentioned in the survey question affects both frequency and mean scores of reports of racial/ethnic discrimination. Our findings suggest caution to researchers when comparing studies that have used different approaches to measure racial/ethnic discrimination and allow us to suggest practical empirical guidelines for measuring and analyzing racial/ethnic discrimination. No less important, we have developed a self-reported measure of recent racial/ethnic discrimination that functions well in a range of different racial/ethnic groups and makes it possible to compare how racial/ethnic discrimination is associated with health disparities among multiple racial/ethnic groups.
In: International journal of public opinion research, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 244-263
ISSN: 0954-2892