Teetering on the Edge of Legal Nihilism: Russia and the Evolving European Human Rights Regime
In: Human rights quarterly: a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, humanities, and law, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 289
ISSN: 0275-0392
24 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Human rights quarterly: a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, humanities, and law, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 289
ISSN: 0275-0392
Warzones are sometimes described as lawless, but this is rarely the case. Armed insurgents often replace the state as the provider of law and justice in areas under their authority. Based on extensive field work, Rebel Courts offers a compelling insight into the judicial governance of armed groups, a phenomenon never studied comprehensively until now.
In: Cambridge studies in law and society
What does it mean for courts and other legal institutions to be culturally sensitive? What are the institutional implications and consequences of such an aspiration? To what extent is legal discourse capable of accommodating multiple cultural narratives without losing its claim to normative specificity? And how are we to understand meetings of law and culture in the context of formal and informal legal processes, when demands are made to accommodate cultural difference? The encounter of law and culture is a polycentric relation, but these questions draw our attention to law and legal institutions as one site of encounter warranting further investigation, to map out the place of culture in the domains of law by relying on the insights of law, anthropology, politics, and philosophy. Culture in the Domains of Law seeks to examine and answer these questions, resulting in a richer outlook on both law and culture
In: The library of essays in international law
In: Cambridge studies in international and comparative law [22]
In: The Canadian yearbook of international law: Annuaire canadien de droit international, Band 55, S. 33-71
ISSN: 1925-0169
RésuméLe fait que des enfants se joignent aux forces armées ou à des groupes armés non étatiques est une terrible réalité qui résiste aux efforts de la communauté internationale pour l'éliminer. La participation directe aux hostilités par des enfants-soldats constitue possiblement l'aspect le plus troublant de cette réalité, en ce qu'elle soulève la possibilité de devoir attaquer directement ces enfants. Le droit international humanitaire reste à ce jour plutôt discret quant à cette facette de la participation des enfants aux conflits armés, laissant les forces armées improviser leur réaction. Les Forces armées canadiennes ont adopté en 2017 ce qui est présenté comme la première doctrine militaire sur les enfants-soldats. Le présent texte propose une analyse de cette doctrine à la lumière de la réglementation de l'emploi de la force contre les enfants-soldats en droit international humanitaire, pour déterminer si les enfants peuvent jamais devenir des combattants à part entière, à quelles conditions ils peuvent être considérés comme civils participant directement aux hostilités, et quelles limites le droit humanitaire impose quant aux choix des moyens et mesures de guerre employés.
Canada's experience in the war against terrorism goes back to the seventies, and continues to develop nowadays, with the last direct terrorist activity in 2017. The Canadian Government reacted to these terrorist attacks by enacting a number of statutes that reflect a changing international paradigm in relation to the fight against terrorism. Fundamental rights and liberties such as the freedom of expression, the right to private life and to personal freedom have been curtailed by these legislative measures. The practical consequences of these measures are analyzed via a comparative examination of the Inter-American System of Human Rights. In general terms, the war against terrorism produces significant impacts over the human rights. ; La experiencia de Canadá en la lucha contra el terrorismo se remonta a inicios de la década de los setenta y se desarrolla hasta la época actual (los acontecimientos más recientes han tenido lugar en el año 2017). Las medidas legislativas fueron la vía adoptada por parte de Canadá para contrarrestar los ataques y reflejar el cambio de paradigma político en la esfera internacional con relación al fenómeno del terrorismo. Derechos fundamentales como el derecho a la libre expresión, a la vida privada y a la libertad personal se encuentran particularmente afectados por estas medidas. Un análisis comparativo del sistema canadiense y el sistema interamericano permite identificar las consecuencias de estas medidas. En términos más amplios, la lucha contra el terrorismo genera impactos significativos sobre los derechos humanos en general.
BASE
Canada's experience in the war against terrorism goes back to the seventies, and continues to develop nowadays, with the last direct terrorist activity in 2017. The Canadian Government reacted to these terrorist attacks by enacting a number of statutes that reflect a changing international paradigm in relation to the fight against terrorism. Fundamental rights and liberties such as the freedom of expression, the right to private life and to personal freedom have been curtailed by these legislative measures. The practical consequences of these measures are analyzed via a comparative examination of the Inter-American System of Human Rights. In general terms, the war against terrorism produces significant impacts over the human rights.
BASE
In: Journal of legal pluralism and unofficial law: JLP, Band 49, Heft 1, S. 87-92
ISSN: 2305-9931
In: Politics and religion: official journal of the APSA Organized Section on Religion and Politics, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 656-659
ISSN: 1755-0491
In: Politics and religion: official journal of the APSA Organized Section on Religion and Politics, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 663-664
ISSN: 1755-0491
In: Human rights quarterly, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 289-240
ISSN: 1085-794X
From Pussy Riot to Michael Khodorkovskiy, the solidity of the rule of law in Russia seems rather shaky. This has translated into a troubled relationship between Russia and the European Court of Human Rights since Russia's ratification of the European Convention in 1998. Various factors explain this tension, including the structure of the judiciary, the status of the European Convention in Russia law, public mistrust of the courts, and ongoing episodes of armed conflicts. This has posed enormous challenges to the European Court of Human Rights, and even the most recent attempts to improve it are unlikely to trigger better compliance in Russia.
In: The Canadian yearbook of international law: Annuaire canadien de droit international, Band 46, S. 762-767
ISSN: 1925-0169
In: The Reality of International LawEssays in Honour of Ian Brownlie, S. 439-454
In: The Canadian yearbook of international law: Annuaire canadien de droit international, Band 33, S. 498-501
ISSN: 1925-0169