Suchergebnisse

W. Solarz, K. Najberek, A. Pociecha & E. Wilk-Woźniak (2017, Diversity and Distributions, 23, 113–117) published a letter in Diversity and Distributions debating our view that waterbirds are important vectors of alien species (C. Reynolds, N. A. F. Miranda & G. S. Cumming, 2015 Diversity and Distributions, 21, 744–754; A. J. Green, 2016 Diversity and Distributions, 22, 239–247) and question whether future research into the mechanisms under-pinning this phenomenon can be advantageous for the practical management of alien species. Additionally, Solarz et al. suggest that human activities are the primary source of all alien species introductions and that waterbirds may only act as vectors of secondary dispersal. In this letter, we respond to several arguments raised by the authors surrounding the relevance of waterbird-mediated dispersal in the introduction and spread of alien species. We emphasize the partly deterministic nature of waterbird dispersal and the significance of long-distance dispersal events (and hence the potential for primary introductions of new alien species across political boundaries). Finally, we reaffirm the importance of further research into dispersal by birds to improve our capacity to foresee and manage invasions of those alien species with strong capacity to spread via avian vectors. ; Peer reviewed

Abstract ContextThe disruption of normal activities by humans (i.e. 'anthropogenic disturbance') can have important behavioural, physiological and population effects on coastal birds. These negative effects include increased vigilance, increased energy expenditure and reduced nesting success. To overcome this, separation distances (e.g. buffers and setbacks) are often used to separate threatening stimuli, such as humans, from wildlife. However, in most instances the determination of separation distances are based on little empirical information. This is particularly true for Africa, which supports huge populations of Palearctic migrant shorebirds. AimTo determine suitable separation distances that will reduce anthropogenic disturbance to the coastal bird community at West Coast National Park, South Africa. MethodsThe distance at which a behavioural response (i.e. flight initiation distance, FID) occurred among 15 common coastal bird species when presented with an approaching human was measured. Linear mixed-effects models were used to determine the relationship between FID and body size, migratory status, intraspecific flock size, flock species richness, foraging behaviour and several environmental covariates. Key resultsBody mass was significantly and positively correlated with FID, indicating that larger birds are more sensitive to the anthropogenic stimulus. Furthermore, it was shown that migratory birds had longer FIDs, suggesting that they are less risk tolerant compared with resident birds. The distance at which the approach was initiated (i.e. the start distance, SD) was also significantly and positively correlated with FID, supporting the hypothesis that birds will flush early to avoid the potential negative consequences of fleeing too late. Finally, there was a novel significant effect of increasing wind speed on increasing FID, suggesting a thermoregulatory trade-off. There was no effect of foraging behaviour, flock size or flock composition on FID. ConclusionBased on these data, buffer distances for tidal habitats at West Coast National Park should be set at ~170 m. ImplicationsImproved understanding of FID, and the morphological and behavioural predictors thereof, will enable West Coast National Park and other protected areas to designate separation distances or buffer zones that reduce the negative effects of anthropogenic disturbance on shorebird communities.