Suchergebnisse

Artikel ini ingin menyorot mengenai penentuan kandidat pepala Pemerintah Aceh di internal Partai Aceh. Bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis penentuan kandidat calon Kepala Pemerintah Aceh di Internal Partai Aceh. Serta mengetahui dan menganalisis penentuan kandidat calon Kepala Pemerintah Aceh di Internal Partai Aceh yang tidak merujuk kepada AD dan ART Partai Aceh sekaligus dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 20 Tahun 2007 tentang Partai Politik Lokal di Aceh. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dalam pembahasan, disimpulkan: Pertama, bahwa proses penentuan kandidat calon Kepala Pemerintah Aceh di internal Partai Aceh tidak sesuai dengan Anggaran Dasar dan Anggaran Rumah Tangga Partai Aceh. Akan tetapi proses ditentukan dalam kongres partai hal ini berdasarkan pernyataan para elit-elit Partai Aceh. Kemudian Dewan Pimpinan Pusat, Dewan Pimpinan Wliayah, Dewan Pimpinan Sagoe, Dewan Pimpinan Mukim dan Dewan Pimpinan Gampong sudah mengadakan rapat dalam hal penentuan para kandidat yang diusung. Kedua, konsekuensi dari penentuan kandidat Kepala Pemerintah Aceh baik itu Calon Gubernur/Wakil Gubernur, Calon Bupati/Wakil Bupati, Calon Walikota/Wakil Walikota memang tidak merujuk kepada Anggaran Dasar dan Anggaran Partai Aceh, dalam Anggaran Rumah Tangga Pasal 6 yang menyatakan kewenangan Majelis Tuha Peut menentukan kebijakan strategis namun kenyataannya tidak demikian, hal ini inkonstitional karena melanggar ketentuan AD dan ART Partai Aceh. Karena legitimasi AD dan ART Partai Aceh diakui secara kuat oleh Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 20 Tahun 2007 tentang Partai Politik Lokal di Aceh. This article would like to highlight the determination of the Aceh Government candidate pala in internal Aceh Party. Aims to find out and analyze the determination of candidates for the candidates for the Head of the Government of Aceh in the Internal Aceh Party. As well as knowing and analyzing the determination of candidates for candidates for the Head of the Aceh Government in the Internal Aceh Party who did not refer to the AD and ART of ...

Penelitian tentang pembentukan Qanun Aceh ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis proses evaluasi Qanun Aceh Nomor 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh. Qanun Aceh Nomor 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh telah mendapat pengesahan oleh Gubernur dan DPRA. Hasil evaluasi Pemeritah Pusat dalam hal ini Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia menolak pemberlakukan Qanun Aceh Nomor 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Pengumpulan data menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan (literature research) yang dilakukan untuk memperoleh data sekunder di bidang hukum. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analisis yaitu penelitian yang bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan atau memberikan gambaran secara sistematis, faktual dan akurat terhadap suatu daerah tertentu, mengenai sifat-sifat atau faktor-faktor tertentu. Hasil penelitian ini adalah, (1) Qanun Aceh Nomor 3 Tahun 2013 tentang Bendera dan Lambang Aceh merupakan simbol masyarakat Aceh sendiri. Hal ini dikarenakan ada sejarah yang kuat terhadap bendera dan lambang Aceh, (2) peraturan perundang-undangan memberikan legitimasi terhadap qanun bendera dan lambang Aceh, (3) peneliti juga menemukan di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintah Aceh yang menjelaskan dasar terbentuknya qanun tersebut. Dalam hal proses evaluasi oleh Kementerian Dalam Negeri terkait qanun tersebut, masih belum ada titik temu antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Aceh. Hal ini dikarenakan qanun bendera dan lambang Aceh tidak bisa dibatalkan oleh Pemerintah Pusat karena terhalang oleh pengaturan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintah Aceh.The research on Aceh Qanun (local regulation) establishment was conducted to analyze the evaluation process of Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on Aceh Flag and Symbol. Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on Aceh Flag and Symbol was ratified by Governor and Aceh House of Representative (DPRA). The result of government evaluation in this case Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia refused the enactment of Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on Aceh Flag and Symbol. This research was a normative legal research. The data collection was library research methods to get secondary data in law matters. The research, a descriptive analysis research, aims to describe or provide a systematic, factual and accurate description of a particular area, about certain traits or factors. The research result were as follows, (1) Aceh Qanun Number 3 of 2013 on Aceh Flag and Symbol was Aceh people own symbol. It has a stong history behind the Flag and Symbol, (2) the regulations gives legitimation on Aceh Flag and Symbol Qanun,(3) the researcher also found that there was an Act no.11 year 2006 on Aceh Government that stated the foundation of that Qanun.In relation with the evaluation process by Ministry of Home Affairs, there was no common ground between Central Government and Aceh Government. Aceh Qanun on Aceh Flag and Symbol can not be canceled by Central Government because it is hindered by Act no.11 year 2006 on Aceh Government.

This study entitled "In search of Ideal Concepts Central-Local Relations According to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945". This study aims to determine the future of local governance arrangements relating to the principle of asymmetric decentralization so much more freely take care of his own household. This study is a conceptual attempt to discover the concepts of central and local relations by UUDNRI 1945. The data was collected using library research (literature research) were performed to obtain secondary data in the legal field. This research is descriptive analysis is a study that aims to describe or illustrate a systematic, factual and accurate to a poluasi or a particular region, on the nature or certain factors. Based on the results of the discussion are available, the results of this study are. First, the concept of asymmetric decentralization has long sought its format as a constitutional mandate need further interpretation so really find the ideal concept for the Government of Indonesia. Second, the presence of Law Number 23 Year 2014 on Regional Government is already using the principle of broad autonomy so there keluasaan to manage their own regions. But in the case of researchers working to find a new format, which researchers have to offer is asymmetric decentralization to all areas of Indonesia although it seem difficult but it is if it is done jointly it will be easy to implement. Third, related to asymmetric decentralization to Indonesia has been applied to four areas namely Jakarta, Yogyakarta, Aceh and Papua, but researchers expect in the future Indonesia will be easily made further changes to the Law No. 23 Year 2014 on Regional Government. Fourth, Related to the regional authority which will be a very comprehensive course monitoring methods will be much tighter than before because of the decentralization of government power levels allow to lower or below to determine a number of issues, which they note.

Article 246 paragraph (2) of Law No. 11 Year 2006 concerning Aceh Government may stipulate that the Aceh government and the Aceh region determine the flag and emblem that reflects the privileges and specificity. It is indeed the opposite opinion with the provision of Article 6 (4) of Governement Regulation No. 77 Year 2007 on Regional Symbols which states that the logo design of regional flag should not have similarity in its essential part or in its entirety with logo design and the flag of the banned organization or association or institution or separatist movement in Indonesian. The above explanation makes the writer interested in aanalysing it further with existing legal theory. The research question is what is the position of the flag and emblem of Aceh in relation to legal justice. What is the influence of the flag and emblem of the province of Aceh in the effort to unite the people of Aceh towards legal certainty. How does the flag and emblem of Aceh influence legal order in Indonesia, and is there any legal utility. The method used is descriptive research analysis which is a study that aims to describe or illustrate systematically, factually and accurately a population or certain regions regarding the nature or certain factors. Research results show that the Qanun made should meet the elements of legal objectives in order to be more beneficial to the community at large.

The presence of the Election Law became a new breakthrough for the specificity of Aceh, because Article 571 letter d revoked Article 60 of the UUPA. Of course this was a very serious problem because the 1945 Constitution regulated special regions and there was even special recognition of areas that were considered special and special. This is recorded in Article 18B paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which states that "the state recognizes and respects special and special regional government units regulated by law". The UUPA is the incarnation of the constitution but on the other Election Law revokes immediately without consideration of the DPRA, this is certainly a legal juridical because the UUPA requires that every amended article must pass the door to "consideration of DPRA".

This study wants to examine the suitability of Aceh Qanun with National Law related to the Hierakicity of laws and regulations in Indonesia. In theory it is possible that the Aceh Government can build its own hierarchies that are not the same as the Central Government. This relates to the authority of the Aceh Qanun which is not the same as the Regional Regulation but the hierarchy that is built but meets the basic norms of the Indonesian constitution. There are two focuses which are the focus of this research. First, what is the character of the Aceh Qanun as a legal umbrella in the implementation of post-autonomy Aceh and post-peaceful Aceh? Second, What Is the Future of Law in Aceh? The results of the first research, the character of the Aceh Qanun as a legal umbrella in the implementation of post-autonomy Aceh and post-peaceful Aceh is expected to be able to build Aceh better because of the presence of Law Number 18 Year 2001 and Law Number 11 Year 2006 regarding new hopes for the people of Aceh itself specifically in the field of Islamic sharia. Second, the future of law in Aceh in the discussion of legal development, is greatly developing from creating new norms in Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayah Law, because regulating jinayah law in Aceh does not have to draw the Criminal Code or the Criminal Procedure Code.