L'action politique des mouvements sociaux d'aujourd'hui: Le déclin du politique comme procès de politisation?
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique : RCSP, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 245-246
ISSN: 0008-4239
5 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique : RCSP, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 245-246
ISSN: 0008-4239
In: Annual review of sociology, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 489-516
ISSN: 1545-2115
▪ Abstract Is living in a relatively poor community bad for your health; is living in a relatively affluent community good for your health; or is it only your own socioeconomic position that matters to your health no matter where you live? This article (a) presents a conceptual model suggesting the basic pathways that may link community socioeconomic context to individual health, (b) reviews recent research that has examined whether the socioeconomic context of communities impacts the health of individual residents, over and above their own socioeconomic position, (c) discusses conceptual and methodological challenges of current research, and (d) suggests new directions for future research such as the importance of more closely examining how age, race, gender, and individual socioeconomic position may moderate the impact of community socioeconomic context on individual health and mortality.
In: Sociological spectrum: the official Journal of the Mid-South Sociological Association, Band 29, Heft 4, S. 443-466
ISSN: 1521-0707
In: NBER Working Paper No. w14513
SSRN
Working paper
In: Social science quarterly, Band 90, Heft 5, S. 1321-1340
ISSN: 1540-6237
Objective. To examine whether public support for government intervention to address health disparities varies when disparities are framed in terms of different social groups.Method. A survey experiment was embedded in a public opinion poll of Wisconsin adults. Respondents were randomly assigned to answer questions about either racial, economic, or education disparities in health. Ordered logit regression analyses examine differences across experimental conditions in support for government intervention to address health disparities.Results. Health disparities between economic groups received the broadest support for government intervention, while racial disparities in health received the least support for government intervention. These differences were explained by variation in how respondents' perceived and evaluated health disparities between different social groups.Conclusion. Efforts to garner public support for policies aimed at eliminating health disparities should attend to the politics of social diversity, including the public's disparate perceptions and evaluations of health disparities defined by different social groups.