Suchergebnisse

Abstract. PRIMAVERA (process-based climate simulation: advances in high-resolution modelling and European climate risk assessments) was a European Union Horizon 2020 project whose primary aim was to generate advanced and well-evaluated high-resolution global climate
model datasets for the benefit of governments, business and society in general. Following consultation with members of the insurance industry, we
have used a PRIMAVERA multi-model ensemble to generate a European winter windstorm event set for use in insurance risk analysis, containing
approximately 1300 years of windstorm data. The data are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6492182. To create the storm footprints for the event set, the storms in the PRIMAVERA models are identified through tracking. A method is developed to
separate the winds from storms occurring in the domain at the same time. The wind footprints are bias corrected and converted to 3 s gusts
onto a uniform grid using quantile mapping. The distribution of the number of model storms per season as a function of estimated loss is consistent
with re-analysis, as are the total losses per season, and the additional event set data greatly reduce uncertainty on return period magnitudes. The
event set also reproduces the temporally clustered nature of European windstorms. Since the event set is generated from global climate models, it can help to quantify the non-linear relationship between large-scale climate indices
such as the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and windstorm damage. Although we find only a moderate positive correlation between extended winter NAO
and storm damage in northern European countries (consistent with re-analysis), there is a large change in risk of extreme seasons between negative and positive NAO states. The intensities of the most severe storms in the event set are, however, sensitive to the gust conversion and bias correction method used, so care should be taken when interpreting the expected damages for very long return periods.

PRIMAVERA was a European Union Horizon 2020 project whose primary aim was to generate advanced and well-evaluated high-resolution global climate model datasets, for the benefit of governments, business and society in general. Following consultation with members of the insurance industry, we have used a PRIMAVERA multi-model ensemble to generate a European winter windstorm event set for use in insurance risk analysis, containing approximately 1300 years of windstorm data. To create the storm footprints for the event set, the storms in the PRIMAVERA models are identified through tracking. A method is developed to separate the winds from storms occurring in the domain at the same time. The wind footprints are bias corrected and converted to 3-s gusts onto a uniform grid using quantile mapping. The distribution of the number of model storms per season as a function of estimated loss is consistent with re-analysis, as are the total losses per season, and the additional event set data greatly reduces uncertainty on return period magnitudes. The event set also reproduces the temporally clustered nature of European windstorms. Since the event set is generated from global climate models, it can help to quantify the non-linear relationship between large-scale climate indices such as the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and windstorm damage. Although we find only a moderate positive correlation between extended winter NAO and storm damage in northern European countries (consistent with re-analysis), there is a large change in risk of extreme seasons between negative and positive NAO states. The intensities of the most severe storms in the event set are, however, sensitive to the gust conversion/bias correction method used, so care should be taken when interpreting the expected damages for very long return periods.

Previous studies have shown that the number, intensity, and structure of simulated tropical cyclones (TCs) in climate models get closer to the observations as the horizontal resolution is increased. However, the sensitivity of tropical cyclone precipitation and moisture budget to changes in resolution has received less attention. In this study, we use the five-model ensemble from project PRIMAVERA/HighResMIP to investigate the systematic changes of the water budget of tropical cyclones in a range of horizontal resolutions from 1° to 0.25°. Our results show that, despite a large change in the distribution of TC intensity with resolution, the distribution of precipitation per TC (i.e., averaged in a 5° radial cap) does not change significantly. This result is explained by the fact that low- and high-resolution models represent equally well the large-scale balance that characterizes the moisture budget of TCs, with the radius of the moisture source extending to ~15° from the center of the TC (i.e. well beyond the TC edge). The wind profile is found to converge in the low and high resolutions for radii > 5°, resulting in a moisture flux convergence into the TC of similar magnitude at low and high resolutions. In contrast to precipitation per TC, TC intensity does increase at higher resolution and this is explained by the larger surface latent heat flux near the center of the storm, which leads to an increase in equivalent potential temperature and warmer core anomalies, although this extra latent heat represents a negligible contribution to the overall moisture budget. We discuss the complication arising from the choice of the tracking algorithm when assessing the impact of model resolution. ; This work has been funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme under Grant Agreement 641727. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their constructive remarks and suggestions. We thank Kevin Reed, Helen Dacre, Chris Holloway, Nick Klingaman, Jianfeng Gu, and Ralf Toumi for fruitful discussions and suggestions. ; Peer Reviewed ; Postprint (published version)

This study examines the climatology and structure of rainfall associated with tropical cyclones (TCs) based on the atmosphere-only Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) HighResMIP runs of the PRocess-based climate sIMulation: AdVances in high resolution modelling and European climate Risk Assessment (PRIMAVERA) Project during 1979–2014. We evaluate how the spatial resolution of climate models with a variety of dynamic cores and parameterization schemes affects the representation of TC rainfall. These HighResMIP atmosphere-only runs that prescribe historical sea surface temperatures and radiative forcings can well reproduce the observed spatial pattern of TC rainfall climatology, with high-resolution models generally performing better than the low-resolution ones. Overall, the HighResMIP atmosphere-only runs can also reproduce the observed percentage contribution of TC rainfall to total amounts, with an overall better performance by the high-resolution models. The models perform better over ocean than over land in simulating climatological total TC rainfall, TC rainfall proportion and TC rainfall per TC in terms of spatial correlation. All the models in the HighResMIP atmosphere-only runs underestimate the observed composite TC rainfall structure over both land and ocean, especially in their lower resolutions. The underestimation of rainfall composites by the HighResMIP atmosphere-only runs is also supported by the radial profile of TC rainfall. Overall, the increased spatial resolution generally leads to an improved model performance in reproducing the observed TC rainfall properties. ; We thank the two anomynous reviewers for insightful comments. Wei Zhang and Gabriele Villarini acknowledge support by the National Science Foundation under Grant EAR-1840742. MR, LPC, CDR, RS, PLV, ES, BV, DP, and MPM acknowledge funding from the PRIMAVERA project, funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme under Grant Agreement No. 641727. All the data and codes are available upon reasonable request. There is no conflict of interest for this work. ; Peer Reviewed ; Postprint (author's final draft)

Global climate models (GCMs) are known to suffer from biases in the simulation of atmospheric blocking, and this study provides an assessment of how blocking is represented by the latest generation of GCMs. It is evaluated (i) how historical CMIP6 (Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6) simulations perform compared to CMIP5 simulations and (ii) how horizontal model resolution affects the simulation of blocking in the CMIP6-HighResMIP (PRIMAVERA – PRocess-based climate sIMulation: AdVances in high-resolution modelling and European climate Risk Assessment) model ensemble, which is designed to address this type of question. Two blocking indices are used to evaluate the simulated mean blocking frequency and blocking persistence for the Euro-Atlantic and Pacific regions in winter and summer against the corresponding estimates from atmospheric reanalysis data. There is robust evidence that CMIP6 models simulate blocking frequency and persistence better than CMIP5 models in the Atlantic and Pacific and during winter and summer. This improvement is sizeable so that, for example, winter blocking frequency in the median CMIP5 model in a large Euro-Atlantic domain is underestimated by 33 % using the absolute geopotential height (AGP) blocking index, whereas the same number is 18 % for the median CMIP6 model. As for the sensitivity of simulated blocking to resolution, it is found that the resolution increase, from typically 100 to 20 km grid spacing, in most of the PRIMAVERA models, which are not re-tuned at the higher resolutions, benefits the mean blocking frequency in the Atlantic in winter and summer and in the Pacific in summer. Simulated blocking persistence, however, is not seen to improve with resolution. Our results are consistent with previous studies suggesting that resolution is one of a number of interacting factors necessary for an adequate simulation of blocking in GCMs. The improvements reported in this study hold promise for further reductions in blocking biases as model development continues. ; This research has been supported by the European Commission (PRIMAVERA (grant no. 641727)), the Spanish government (PALEOSTRAT (grant no. CGL2015-69699-R) and JEDiS (grant no. RTI2018-096402-B-I00)), and the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russia (grant no. 0149-2019-0015). ; Peer Reviewed ; Postprint (published version)

Representing the rainy season of the maritime continent is a challenge for global and regional climate models. Here, we compare regional climate models (RCMs) based on the coupled model intercomparison project phase 5 (CMIP5) model generation with high-resolution global climate models with a comparable spatial resolution from the HighResMIP experiment. The onset and the total precipitation of the rainy season for both model experiments are compared against observational datasets for Southeast Asia. A realistic representation of the monsoon rainfall is essential for agriculture in Southeast Asia as a delayed onset jeopardizes the possibility of having three annual crops. In general, the coupled historical runs (Hist-1950) and the historical force atmosphere run (HighresSST) of the high-resolution model intercomparison project (HighResMIP) suite were consistently closer to the observations than the RCM of CMIP5 used in this study. We find that for the whole of Southeast Asia, the HighResMIP models simulate the onset date and the total precipitation of the rainy season over the region closer to the observations than the other model sets used in this study. High-resolution models in the HighresSST experiment showed a similar performance to their low-resolution equivalents in simulating the monsoon characteristics. The HighresSST experiment simulated the anomaly of the onset date and the total precipitation for different El Niño-southern oscillation conditions best, although the magnitude of the onset date anomaly was underestimated. ; Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), Grant/Award Number: S-353/LPDP.3/2019; H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie, Grant/Award Number: 748750; European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, Grant/Award Number: 641727 ; Peer Reviewed ; Postprint (published version)

This study investigates how teleconnections linking tropical rainfall anomalies and wintertime circulation in the northern extra-tropics are represented in historical simulations for the period 1950–2010 run by partners of the EU-funded PRIMAVERA project, following the HighResMIP protocol of CMIP6. The analysis focusses on teleconnections from the western/central Indian Ocean in mid-winter and from the NINO4 region in both the early and the late part of winter; this choice is justified by a substantial change in the relationship between ENSO and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) in the two parts of the season. Model results for both coupled integrations and runs with prescribed sea-surface temperature (SST) are validated against data from the latest ECMWF 20th-century re-analysis, CERA20C. Simulations from six modelling groups are considered, comparing the impact of increasing atmospheric resolution in runs with prescribed SST, and of moving from uncoupled to coupled simulations in the high-resolution version of each model. Single runs were available for each model configurations at the time of writing, with one centre (ECMWF) also providing a 6-member ensemble. Results from this ensemble are compared with those of a 6-member multi-model ensemble (MME) formed by including one simulation from each model. Using only a single historical simulation from each model configuration, it is difficult to detect a consistent change in the fidelity of model-generated teleconnections when either atmospheric resolution is increased or ocean coupling is introduced. However, when simulations from six different models are pooled together in the MME, some improvements in teleconnection patterns can be seen when moving from uncoupled to coupled simulations. For the ECMWF ensemble, improvements in the coupled simulations are only apparent for the late-winter NINO4 teleconnection. While the Indian Ocean teleconnection and the late-winter NINO4 teleconnection appear equally robust in the re-analysis record, the latter is well simulated in the majority of both uncoupled and coupled runs, while the former is reproduced with (generally) much larger errors, and a high degree of variability between individual models and ensemble members. Most of the simulations with prescribed SST fail to produce a realistic estimate of multi-decadal changes between the first and the second part of the 60-year record. This is (at least partially) due to their inability to simulate an Indian Ocean rainfall change which, in observations, has a zonal gradient out of phase with SST changes. In coupled runs, at least one model run with both realistic teleconnections and a good simulation of the inter-decadal pattern of Indian Ocean rainfall also shows a realistic NAO signal in extratropical multi-decadal variability. ; The simulations and diagnostics described in this paper have been funded by the European Union Horizon 2020 PRIMAVERA project, grant agreement no. 641727. Model output from the PRIMAVERA simulations can be accessed from the archive of the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA). Re-analysis data from CERA20C is available from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). ; Peer Reviewed ; Postprint (published version)

This study investigates tropical cyclone integrated kinetic energy, a measure which takes into account the intensity and the size of the storms and which is closely associated with their damage potential, in three different global climate models integrated following the HighResMIP protocol. In particular, the impact of horizontal resolution and of the ocean coupling are assessed. We find that, while the increase in resolution results in smaller and more intense storms, the integrated kinetic energy of individual cyclones remains relatively similar between the two configurations. On the other hand, atmosphere‐ocean coupling tends to reduce the size and the intensity of the storms, resulting in lower integrated kinetic energy in that configuration. Comparing cyclone integrated kinetic energy between a present and a future scenario did not reveal significant differences between the two periods. ; This research has been supported by the Horizon 2020 programme (PRIMAVERA, GA #641727). S. Wild received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska- Curie grant agreement 2020-MSCA- COFUND-2016-754433 and financial support from the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación (FJC2019- 041186-I/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). M. J. Roberts acknowledges the support from the UK-China Research and Innovation Partnership Fund through the Met Office Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) China as part of the Newton Fund. Finally, the authors are most grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments in improving a previous version of this manuscript. ; Peer Reviewed ; Postprint (published version)

Copyright [15-02-2020] American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Act (17 USC §108) does not require the AMS's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form, such as on a website or in a searchable database, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statement, requires written permission or a license from the AMS. All AMS journals and monograph publications are registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (http://www.copyright.com). Questions about permission to use materials for which AMS holds the copyright can also be directed to permissions@ametsoc.org. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policy statement, available on the AMS website (http://www.ametsoc.org/CopyrightInformation). ; A multimodel, multiresolution set of simulations over the period 1950–2014 using a common forcingprotocol from CMIP6 HighResMIP have been completed by six modeling groups. Analysis of tropicalcyclone performance using two different tracking algorithms suggests that enhanced resolution toward25 km typically leads to more frequent and stronger tropical cyclones, together with improvements inspatial distribution and storm structure. Both of these factors reduce typical GCM biases seen at lowerresolution. Using single ensemble members of each model, there is little evidence of systematic im-provement in interannual variability in either storm frequency or accumulated cyclone energy as comparedwith observations when resolution is increased. Changesin the relationships between large-scale drivers ofclimate variability and tropical cyclone variability in the Atlantic Ocean are also not robust to modelresolution. However, using a larger ensemble of simulations (of up to 14 members) with one model atdifferent resolutions does show evidence of increased skill at higher resolution. The ensemble mean cor-relation of Atlantic interannual tropical cyclone variability increases from;0.5 to;0.65 when resolutionincreases from 250 to 100 km. In the northwestern Pacific Ocean the skill keeps increasing with 50-kmresolution to 0.7. These calculations also suggest that more than six members are required to adequatelydistinguish the impact of resolution within the forced signal from the weather noise. ; Authors MR, JS, PLV, KH, BV, RH, AB, ES, LPC, LT, CR, RS, and DP acknowledge funding from the PRIMAVERA project, funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme under Grant Agreement 641727. Author JM acknowledges funding from the Blue-Action project, funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme under Grant Agreement 727852. Authors MR and JC acknowledge support from the U.K.–China Research and Innovation Partnership Fund through the Met Office Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) China as part of the Newton Fund. Funding for authors PU and CZ to support use of the TempestExtremes suite was provided under NASA award NNX16AG62G and the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science award DE-SC0016605. Many thanks are given to the editor and three anonymous reviewers for their comments, which have greatly strengthened this paper. ; Peer Reviewed ; Postprint (published version)

In this study, we evaluate a set of high-resolution (25–50 km horizontal grid spacing) global climate models (GCMs) from the High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP), developed as part of the EU-funded PRIMAVERA (Process-based climate simulation: Advances in high resolution modelling and European climate risk assessment) project, and from the EURO-CORDEX (Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment) regional climate models (RCMs) (12–50 km horizontal grid spacing) over a European domain. It is the first time that an assessment of regional climate information using ensembles of both GCMs and RCMs at similar horizontal resolutions has been possible. The focus of the evaluation is on the distribution of daily precipitation at a 50 km scale under current climate conditions. Both the GCM and RCM ensembles are evaluated against high-quality gridded observations in terms of spatial resolution and station density. We show that both ensembles outperform GCMs from the 5th Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), which cannot capture the regional-scale precipitation distribution properly because of their coarse resolutions. PRIMAVERA GCMs generally simulate precipitation distributions within the range of EURO-CORDEX RCMs. Both ensembles perform better in summer and autumn in most European regions but tend to overestimate precipitation in winter and spring. PRIMAVERA shows improvements in the latter by reducing moderate-precipitation rate biases over central and western Europe. The spatial distribution of mean precipitation is also improved in PRIMAVERA. Finally, heavy precipitation simulated by PRIMAVERA agrees better with observations in most regions and seasons, while CORDEX overestimates precipitation extremes. However, uncertainty exists in the observations due to a potential undercatch error, especially during heavy-precipitation events. The analyses also confirm previous findings that, although the spatial representation of precipitation is improved, the effect of increasing resolution from 50 to 12 km horizontal grid spacing in EURO-CORDEX daily precipitation distributions is, in comparison, small in most regions and seasons outside mountainous regions and coastal regions. Our results show that both high-resolution GCMs and CORDEX RCMs provide adequate information to end users at a 50 km scale ; The PRIMAVERA project is funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme, grant agreement no. 641727. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Regional Climate and the Working Group on Coupled Modelling, the former coordinating body of CORDEX and responsible panel for CMIP5. We also thank all the climate modelling groups (listed in Tables 1 and 2 of this paper) for producing and making available their model output. We also acknowledge the Earth System Grid Federation infrastructure, an international effort led by the U.S. Department of Energy's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison, the European Network for Earth System Modelling, and other partners in the Global Organisation for Earth System Science Portals (GO-ESSP). Marie-Estelle Demory, Silje L. Sørland, Roman Brogli, and Christoph Schär acknowledge the Partnership for advanced computing in Europe (PRACE) for awarding us access to Piz Daint at ETH Zürich/Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (Switzerland) for conducting COSMO simulations. This work used JASMIN, the UK's collaborative data analysis environment (http://jasmin.ac.uk, last access: July 2020). Ségolène Berthou gratefully acknowledges funding from the European Union under Horizon 2020 project European Climate Prediction System (EUCP; grant agreement: 776613). Jesús Fernández acknowledges support from the Spanish R&D Program through project INSIGNIA (CGL2016-79210-R), co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF/FEDER). We acknowledge the E-OBS dataset from the EU-FP6 project UERRA (http://www.uerra.eu, last access: September 2019) and the data providers in the ECA&D project (https://www.ecad.eu, last access: September 2019). We acknowledge the CARPATCLIM Database © European Commission – JRC, 2013. The authors thank IPMA for the PT02 precipitation dataset, as well as AEMET and UC for the Spain02 dataset, available at http://www.meteo.unican.es/datasets/spain02 (last access: September 2019). The SAFRAN dataset was provided by METEO FRANCE. The European Climate Prediction system, which provided UKCPobs, is funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme, grant agreement no. 776613. We thank the Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss for providing the Alpine precipitation grid dataset (EURO4M-APGD) developed as part of the EU project EURO4M (http://www.euro4m.eu, last access: September 2019). The authors would like to thank Andreas F. Prein and an anonymous referee for their thorough review and constructive comments that contributed to the improvement of this paper.

Abstract Future changes in tropical cyclone properties are an important component of climate change impacts and risk for many tropical and midlatitude countries. In this study we assess the performance of a multimodel ensemble of climate models, at resolutions ranging from 250 to 25 km. We use a common experimental design including both atmosphere-only and coupled simulations run over the period 1950–2050, with two tracking algorithms applied uniformly across the models. There are overall improvements in tropical cyclone frequency, spatial distribution, and intensity in models at 25 km resolution, with several of them able to represent very intense storms. Projected tropical cyclone activity by 2050 generally declines in the South Indian Ocean, while changes in other ocean basins are more uncertain and sensitive to both tracking algorithm and imposed forcings. Coupled models with smaller biases suggest a slight increase in average TC 10 m wind speeds by 2050. ; M. J. R. and J. C. acknowledge the support from the UK‐China Research and Innovation Partnership Fund through the Met Office Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) China as part of the Newton Fund. M. J. R., J. S., P. L. V., K. H., B. V., R. H., A. B., E. S., L.‐ P. C., L. T., C. D. R., R. S., and D. P. acknowledge funding from the PRIMAVERA project, funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme under Grant 641727. J. M. acknowledges funding from the Blue‐Action project, funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme under Grant 727852. Funding for P. U. and C. Z. to support the use of the TempestExtremes suite was provided under National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Award NNX16AG62G and the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Award DE‐SC0016605. C. K. and Y. Y. acknowledge funding from the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (2RF‐1701) by the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency (ERCA) of Japan and from the Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models (TOUGOU) Grant JPMXD0717935457 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan. The CESM1.3 simulations are completed through the International Laboratory for High‐Resolution Earth System Prediction (iHESP)—a collaboration among QNLM, TAMU, and NCAR, from which D. F., Q. Z., G. D., N. R., H. W., and L. W. acknowledge funding. NCAR is a major facility sponsored by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement 1852977. The CESM1.3 simulations were performed on Frontera at the Texas Advanced Computing Center. ; Peer Reviewed ; Postprint (published version)