Suchergebnisse
Filter
43 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Democracy and Necessity: Rightly Dividing Political Power: Using Simple Game Theory to Identify When Policy Decisions Should be Centralized and When Decisions Should be Decentralized
In: L' Europe en formation: revue d'études sur la construction européenne et le fédéralisme = journal of studies on European integration and federalism, Band 363, Heft 1, S. 73-93
ISSN: 2410-9231
Résumé Cet article utilise des modèles simples afin d'identifier l'ensemble des politiques qui devraient être mises en œuvre au niveau de l'Etat et repère les conditions dans lesquelles d'autres politiques devraient être déléguées à un gouvernement national. L'auteur nous montre alors que selon des paramètres intuitifs, couplés à des paramètres logiques, l'exécution judiciaire de cette limite décisionelle vaut mieux que de laisser son auto-application au Congrès (bien que des paramètres raisonnables existent dans le cas ou l'auto-application augmenterait le bien-être public au dela de son exécution juridique). Lorsqu'elles sont appliquées selon les besoins, les structures fédérales — à savoir la combinaison de gouvernement centralisé dans certaines régions et des structures décentralisées dans d'autres domaines — peuvent devenir des institutions et outils d'amélioration démocratique aussi bien qu'une facon d'améliorer l'éfficience institutionnelle.
Strategic Behavior and Policy Choice on the U.S. Supreme Court
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 4, Heft 2
ISSN: 1541-0986
Book Reviews: AMERICAN POLITICS: Thomas H. Hammond, Chris W. Bonneau, and Reginald S. Sheehan: "Strategic Behavior and Policy Choice on the U.S. Supreme Court."
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 387
ISSN: 1537-5927
Strategic Behavior and Policy Choice on the U.S. Supreme Court
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 387-388
ISSN: 1537-5927
The Impact of Divided Government on Legislative Production
In: Public choice, Band 123, Heft 1-2, S. 217-233
ISSN: 1573-7101
Empirical Determinants of Bicameral Sequence in State Legislatures
In: Legislative studies quarterly, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 29-42
ISSN: 1939-9162
Empirical Determinants of Bicameral Sequence in State Legislatures
In: Legislative studies quarterly, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 29-42
ISSN: 0362-9805
The Impact of Divided Government on Legislative Production
In: Public choice, Band 123, Heft 1, S. 217-234
ISSN: 0048-5829
The Impact of Bicameralism on Legislative Production
In: Legislative studies quarterly, Band 28, Heft 4, S. 509-528
ISSN: 1939-9162
It is generally accepted by scholars, as well as by cameral partisans, that adding a second chamber to an otherwise unicameral legislative process will decrease the volume of laws that a legislature enacts. This study challenges the conventional wisdom. First, I offer a simple theoretical argument that shows that when second chambers can originate as well as reject legislation, bicameralism will have an indeterminate impact on legislative production. Second, I provide historical data gathered from the four U.S. states that have experienced cameral transitions. Although very rudimentary, the historical evidence, when coupled with the theoretical argument, raises serious doubt regarding the traditional claim that bicameralism reduces the production of legislation.
Maxwell L. Stearns,Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Making
In: Public Choice, Band 115, Heft 3/4, S. 501-506
The Impact of Bicameralism on Legislative Production
In: Legislative studies quarterly, Band 28, Heft 4, S. 509-528
ISSN: 0362-9805
Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Making
In: Public choice, Band 115, Heft 3-4, S. 501-506
ISSN: 0048-5829
Maxwell L. Stearns, Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Making
In: Public choice, Band 115, Heft 3, S. 501-506
ISSN: 0048-5829
Constitutional process: A social choice analysis of Supreme Court decision making, by Maxwell L. Stearns, is reviewed.
Book Review: Maxwell L. Stearns, Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Making
In: Public choice, Band 115, Heft 3, S. 501-506
ISSN: 0048-5829