On David Lewis' Philosophy of Mind
In: ProtoSociology, Band 14, S. 285-311
3 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: ProtoSociology, Band 14, S. 285-311
In: ProtoSociology: an international journal of interdisciplinary research, Band 6, S. 61-78
ISSN: 1611-1281
In: ProtoSociology: an international journal of interdisciplinary research, Band 39, S. 51-86
ISSN: 1611-1281
It is part of Jaegwon. Kim's life's work that he has demonstrated that non-reductive physicalism is not an option in the philosophy of the mental. However, he also recognizes the problems of mentalism that cannot be solved by physicalism. This concerns above all phenomenal consciousness, which resists naturalization. In the philosophy of the mental, this addresses a very fundamental problem of what the place of the mental is in the physical world. It is Kim's merit in the philosophy of the mental to have shown non-reductive physicalism to be contradictory and qualitative experience to have shown its place as a phenomenon that cannot be explained physically. But Kim wants to be a physicalist and functionalist at the same time. For this he describes his position as "physicalism, or something near enough". It is to Kim's credit that he has presented non-reductive physicalism as a variation of British emergentism. But this raises a very fundamental problem, whether this is a valid research program of systematization of mental experience or whether it needs another research program.