Suchergebnisse

THIS ESSAY ARGUES FOR THE INCLUSION OF "PEASANT STUDIES" WITHIN A BROADER FIELD OF HISTORICAL INQUIRY WHICH IS CALLED PROLETARIANIZATION STUDIES," BUT ALSO ARGUES THAT WE SHOULD CONTINUE TO USE A PEASANT CONCEPT. IN PURSUING THIS ARGUMENT, IT EXAMINES SOME RECENT TRENDS IN THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL LITERATURE ON PESANTS. THE AUTHOR DOES THIS NOT AS A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE BUT AS AN ATEMPT TO EXPLORE THE BASIS FOR PROLETARIANIZATION STUDIES.