Suchergebnisse
Filter
8 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Recreating the House: The 1842 Apportionment Act and the Whig Party's Reconstruction of Representation
In: Polity, Band 49, Heft 3, S. 408-433
ISSN: 1744-1684
Federalism and the Electoral College: The Development of the General Ticket Method for Selecting Presidential Electors: Table A1
In: Publius: the journal of federalism, Band 46, Heft 2, S. 147-169
ISSN: 1747-7107
The Lovers' Quarrel: The Two Foundings and American Political Development
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 130, Heft 4, S. 790-792
ISSN: 1538-165X
Federalism and the Electoral College: The Development of the General Ticket Method for Selecting Presidential Electors: Table A1
In: Publius: the journal of federalism
ISSN: 0048-5950
The Lovers' Quarrel: The Two Foundings and American Political Development by Elvin T.Lim. New York, Oxford University Press, 2014. 312 pp. $47.95
In: Political science quarterly: PSQ ; the journal public and international affairs, Band 130, Heft 4, S. 790-792
ISSN: 0032-3195
Net Assessment - The Warriors: Reflections of a Fighter Pilot, Test Pilot, and Veteran of the Air Wars over Vietnam
In: Air & space power journal, Band 17, Heft 3, S. 113
Polls and Elections Without Rhyme or Reason? Understanding Presidential Nomination Delegate Allocation Rules
In: Presidential studies quarterly: official publication of the Center for the Study of the Presidency, Band 48, Heft 4, S. 804-816
ISSN: 1741-5705
Given the prevailing two‐party system in the United States, presidential primary and caucus outcomes strongly influence the choices available to voters in presidential elections. While the Democratic Party has strong national rules on how delegates are to be awarded from primaries and caucuses, the Republican Party allows significant local discretion in crafting rules that translate primary and/or caucus outcomes into pledged delegates. This is significant because delegate vote totals determine who becomes the party's nominee. Little is known, though, about the rationale for selecting different rules for delegate allocation. We develop a method for classifying delegate allocation rules using a three‐category scale as winner take all, fully proportional, or mixed. We then evaluate how different factors, including state ideology, state size, and the number of states holding a primary on the same day can influence rules by which election results are translated into delegate counts.