Suchergebnisse

The Covid-19 pandemic reduced national income in the tourism sector. Government capacity is needed to overcome these problems. Using comparisons between Indonesia and Thailand, this study aims to test the government's capacity to restore the tourism sector during a pandemic. This comparison is necessary in order to obtain an in-depth analysis of the capacity of governments representing ASEAN in the recovery of the tourism sector. The literature study method and secondary data were used in this research. The data analysis used a qualitative descriptive approach. The results of the study found that the governments in both countries had sufficient capacity to restore the tourism sector due to the Covid-19 outbreak. However, the capacity of the Thai government is somewhat better in integrating tourism recovery efforts and preventing the transmission of Covid-19. However, bribery and corruption are found in Thailand. This study concludes that the recovery of the tourism sector during a pandemic requires the capacity of the government to provide a number of economic stimulus packages that are integrated with regulatory health and quarantine protocols.

with the case of issuance of Cilacap Local Government Act No. 6/2001 governing Plan ofSegara Anakan Space Administration. The issuance of this local act has a main objective tocontrol natural resource use practices by local people living in the region of Segara AnakanConservation Zone. Applying a case study, this study shows that the implementation ofconservation policy in Segara Anakan Area is far from effective in controlling exploitativeand destructive practices over Segara Anakan resources such as overfishing by apong netfishermen and land use expansion for agricultural practices and settlement purpose. Inconsequence, Segara Anakan Area as limited Conservation Zone remains under raisingpopulation pressure. Some causes of ineffective policy implementation founded in this studyare lack of policy communication, ineffective of coordination among agencies, and lack ofresource availability.

This article is part of an international relations study conducted by the authors. This study aims to illustrate the extent to which Indonesia can get out of the "entanglement" of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in the tourism industry sector. Another purpose of writing this article is to analyze the Indonesian government's role in using the term "new normal" and its relation to sustainable tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic has not ended. Tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic is the focus of the discussion of this article because it is one of the industries most harmed by this pandemic. Globally the loss of world tourism reaches US$22 billion. This figure will continue to increase as long as this pandemic cannot be controlled through vaccines and drugs. No exception for Indonesia, which lost the country's original income from this sector, reaching tens of trillions of rupiah in just four months since WHO announced COVID-19 as a global pandemic. The new normal situation during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is an opportunity as well as a challenge for world tourism in general and Indonesian tourism in particular. The change in lifestyle and habits of the community in traveling directly or indirectly has "hit" this industry very hard. Undeniably, reactivating tourism industry activities do have considerable risk, but on the other hand, many sectors depend on this industry. Cleanliness, Health, Safety, Environment Sustainability (CHSE) strategy conducted by the Indonesian government is one of the efforts in re-mobilizing Indonesia's tourism sector amid the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the opportunity to apply three main principles of sustainable tourism in the new normal era, namely involving the social sector in policy engagement, maintaining the sustainability of natural resources and making sustainable development a synonym of economic growth.

This research is motivated by the SATRIA CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) Forum in Banyumas Regency which involves various parties such as local governments, companies, academics, NGOs, and mass media that collaborate in supporting regional development through CSR. Therefore, this paper aims to describe in-depth the governance of the SATRIA CSR Forum in Banyumas Regency in the perspective of collaborative governance. This research uses a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. The research location was in Banyumas Regency, with the target of the research consisting of government elements, private elements, mass media elements, NGOs, the community, and academics. The selection of informants was carried out using purposive sampling and snowball sampling techniques. The data analysis method used is the interactive analysis. The results found that the existence of internal and external dialogue was good initial progress in the governance of the SATRIA CSR Forum. Even so, there are still some aspects of CSR Forum governance that have not been maximized, such as stakeholder's commitment and the business community's understanding of CSR regulations. Therefore, efforts are needed to get the business community involved in the SATRIA CSR Forum. In this case, the role of local government is one of the keys for the business world to be involved, including by providing understanding to the business community regarding CSR regulations. The results of this study contribute to an understanding of the implementation of collaborative approaches in the context of CSR programs at the local level. ; Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi adanya Forum CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) SATRIA di Kabupaten Banyumas yang melibatkan berbagai pihak seperti pemerintah daerah, perusahaan, akademisi, LSM, serta media massa yang saling berkolaborasi dalam mendukung pembangunan daerah melalui CSR. Oleh karena itu, tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan secara mendalam mengenai tata kelola Forum CSR SATRIA di Kabupaten ...

Abstract: The indicator of performance appraisal of policy implementation must notice some aspects, which are: access, refraction, accuracy of the service, accountability, and suitability of the program with the needs. Gumelem Kulon Village, in these first two years, reaches the biggest Village Fund among the others 266 villages, and it become one of the examples of the geographic condition of Banjarnegara Regency. The purpose of this research is to describe and analyze the implementation of Village Fund in Gumelem Kulon Village, in Banjarnegara Regency. This research uses qualitative method, with purposive sampling technique. The result of this research shows that the implementation of Village Fund in Gumelem Kulon Village hasn't runs optimally. Some aspects that haven't fulfilled optimally are: First, the socialization in these two years still using verbal method, so the program hasn't socialized optimally. Second, there is refraction or deviation in implementation, which is 100% of Village Fund allocated to physical development so there's no allocation for human empowerment. Third, the researcher found that most of the people in Gumelem Kulon thought that physical development is more important than empowerment. There are also some success achievements in implementation of the policy. First, there's a local tradition called songolasan which is success to increase the people's participation in implementation of Village Fund. But, songolasan as a local tradition hasn't been able to reach ideal participation. That's because songolasan is an informal media, meanwhile the proposal that can be applied with Village Fund is the proposal through the formal procedure. Second, the development activity is match with the development plan. Third, the Gumelem Kulon Village's government has showed their responsible horizontally to the BPD (Badan Permusyawaratan Desa or Village Consultative Agency) as the representation of the people, and vertically to the regent through the district. Keywords: Policy implementation, Village ...

The research was motivated because there are social problems in the form of access to employment opportunities for people with productive age disabilities in Banyumas Regency that cannot be resolved alone by local government, so collaborative governance efforts are needed together with non-government through Program Gerbang Penyandang Disabilitas Sukses (Gendis). This research to describe collaborative in the Program Gendis based on the collaborative governance theory of Rusell M.Linden through five stages: 1) Basic collaboration, 2)Relationship, 3) High stakes, 4) Consistuency for collaboration, 5) Collaborative leadership. The methods used in this study are descriptive with a qualitative approach. The research findings that Program Gendis has not been optimal because coordination and communication that can be the main key to forming collaboration and building trust do not have a clear direction resulting in synergy from stakeholders who have not formed bond with each other.

The Banyumas Regency government intends to develop the potential of economy creative in their region through the Banyumas Regent Decree No.050/462/Year 2018 about creative economy committee. In connection with the stipulation of the policy, was reviewed the process of selecting the Banyumas Regent Decree Number 050/462/Year 2018 concerning Banyumas Creative Economy Committee as a regional policy, the election of the Banyumas Regent Decree Number 050/ 462/Year 2018 concerning the Banyumas Creative Economy Committee based on criteria technical feasibility; political viability; economic and financial possibility; and administrative operability, and to find out whether there are other criteria used by the Banyumas Regency Government when determining the Banyumas Regent Decree Number 050/462/Year 2018. The research method used in this study is a qualitative method. The selection of informants uses purposive sampling and snowball sampling. Data is collected through in-depth interviews, observation and documentation. The data analysis method used is an interactive analysis method. To accomplish the validity of the data, the criteria for the degree of trust, transferability, dependability and certainty were used. The results showed that the alternative policy was chosen based on the criteria for selecting the alternative policy: 1) Technical feasibility, it was found that the purpose of establishing KEK was as a forum for ecraf's actors. 2) Economic and financial, KEK doesn't receive any special funds and no goals have been achieved. 3) Political viability, this policy doesn't contradicting with the applicable regulations. 4) Administrative Operability policy is realistic, but the support from the nine offices has not been maximal. 5) The criteria chosen are based on the success of the other regions and then it is adopted. It is the main criteria in the process of selecting and determining KEK as an alternative policy for the development of creative economy potentian in Banyumas Regency

Local government law changes in Indonesia have brought a significant change in terms of authority management in particular kelurahan government as the lowest bureaucracy. Previously, some Kelurahans have the authority to manage and develop funds to improve the community welfare. However, they just recently conduct the administrative functions to implement some duties from the upper government level. This change negatively influences the performance level of Kelurahans. Using some kelurahans in Wonosobo Regency Central Java with a qualitative method, this research tries to explore what consequences may occur as the result of local governance law changes. The results suggest that there should be various efforts to strengthen the institutional capacity of Kelurahans instead of letting them have poor performance. This research provides the theoretical and practical knowledge on the semi autonomous model of lowest bureaucracy for strengthening institutional capacity. Implication of findings from this research is the lowest governmental institution needs to be empowered with more authorities and development budgets in order to improve their actions for the community welfare.

The Children's Forum is a forum for children's participation in development that bridges children's aspirations to the government. Child-friendly Cities/Districts aim to ensure the fulfillment of children's rights in a city/district. Both were formed by the Ministry of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection, so their existence is interrelated with each other. In Banyumas Regency both have been formed, so that with the presence of the Banyumas Children's Forum, participation can be analyzed as an effort to create a Child-friendly City in Banyumas Regency. This study aims to find out how the participation of the Banyumas Children's Forum in realizing Child-friendly City in Banyumas Regency is viewed from the perspective of multi-stakeholder partnerships using descriptive qualitative research methods. The selection of informants used was purposive sampling technique. Collecting data using interview, documentation and observation methods and data analysis methods using interactive analysis methods. The results showed that the Banyumas Children's Forum was formed by a Decree of the Banyumas Regent, fostered by the Banyumas Regent, and facilitated by the facilitators. However, the relationship between the facilitator and the Banyumas Children's Forum has not been closely intertwined because the task of the facilitator is conditional if the Children's Forum needs assistance. For the Child-friendly City program, it is the responsibility of all stakeholders, including the Banyumas Children's Forum which is included in the Banyumas Child-friendly City Task Force. The Banyumas Children's Forum is included in one of the institutional cluster indicators, which are responsible for realizing Child-friendly City. Therefore, to help realize a Child-friendly City, a Children's Forum has now been formed in 27 sub-districts throughout Banyumas, and it is being targeted to establish a Children's Forum in all villages. The activities of the Banyumas Children's Forum are monitored and evaluated directly by the Banyumas Regent as the supervisor and the Head of the Section for the Fulfillment of Children's Rights of the DPPKBP3A.

Decentralization policy in Indonesia has been expanded to the level of the village since 2015. The main purpose of this policy is to improve the performance of village government in providing more effective public service and efforts to poverty alleviation in rural areas. The authors argue that social capital, governance practices, leadership capacity, and resources can be important factors influencing the performance of village government. However, knowledge about to which extent village governments present their actual performance concerning social capital, governance practices, leadership and resources is still not sufficient yet. Using survey data conducted in 2015, this study aims to describe the early state of village government performance and examines links among social capital, governance practices, leadership capacity and resources with village government performance. The survey has selected 10 villages representing upland and lowland areas in Banyumas Regency, Central Java Indonesia. From each village, we choose 30 community leaders to express their opinion on our variables. Data is analyzed by descriptive statistics and ordinal regression since it was an ordinal scale. The result shows that village governments still have a good ability to formulate strategic planning, to realize development outcomes relevant to community needs, to utilize public participation in decision-making stages, to develop community organization capacity and to empower villagers.

The reduction of kelurahan (Sub-District Government) authority has decreased its duties and functions after the implementation of the Law No. 23/2014 on Local Governance. This policy stimulates several kelurahan at Wonosobo Region to propose their villages' status changing from kelurahan into desa (Rural Government). Based on this case, this research aims to analyze the actual performance of kelurahan, and the motives of the village status changing. This research uses descriptive qualitative approach to answer those objectives.Observation, in-depth interview and focus group discussion are used to obtain data from informants who represent kelurahan, local government, non-government organizations and community leaders. Technique ofdata analysis of this research uses interactive data analysis including collecting, condensing, and describing data which is ended by conclusion. Results of study show that although the main function and tasks of kelurahan has decreased significantly, in general, the performance in service area still satisfies the public. However, services for development of public facilities are still far from public expectation. Furthermore, this research also found that there are 4 aspects encouraging the kelurahan to change into desa, namely economic, political, geographical and community profile motives. Implication of this research leads to the need of strengthening of kelurahan particularly in developing physical facilities provision service. It is intended to anticipate the possibility of kelurahan which will be left behind by desa.

An effort to develop village tourism potential is not a simple issue. This development requires careful planning and proper management. The purpose of this research is to formulate a synergy model that engages the village government and village consultative agency elements in the development of village tourism potential. This study takes Baturraden Sub-District, Banyumas Regency, as its research location. Baturraden Sub-District boasts a famous tourism destination, Baturraden Tourist Attraction, and 12 (twelve) villages with tourism potential in its surroundings. In this case, the village government (Pemdes) and Village Consultative Agency (BPD) play a vital role in building synergy to arrange a village tourism potential exploration policy. This legal research employs a qualitative approach, combined interview to collect the data, FGD, a document study, and observation. The research results find that BPD, which takes its role in village discussion, attempts to explore and develop village tourism potential by engaging all stakeholders. Keywords:synergy, village consultative agency, village government, village tourism

The tourism industry suffered a significant loss from the COVID-19 pandemic. However, in line with decreasing the COVID-19 impacts, recent tourism behavior may be the cause of a phenomenon called as overtourism. The aim of this study was to investigate the unique phenomena of overtourism in Indonesia after the COVID-19 pandemic through a social pyschological approach. By using a critical discourse analysis, this study finds that a negative emotion generated by the COVID-19 pandemic has led to "revenge tourism" caused by two years of isolation. After the transmission effect of COVID-19 is decreasing, people who experience psychological breakdown, vent their tourism interests simultaneously, which in turn causing overtourism. In the perspective of psychology, negative emotion that has been piled up during lockdown may be the reason of overtourism. Meanwhile, overtourism also has negative social impact. From social-psychology perspective, place attachment is one of the basic needs in all human. When the control over their environment was disrupted, this may lead to many problems. Uncontrolled overtourism causes environmental damage and reducing the quality of tourism. Thus, this study suggests that the government and stakeholders collaborate to mitigate tourism disasters to prevent the threat of overtourism to tourism sustainability.

The transportation service subsidy is intended to ease the burden of students from low-income families by helping with their need for mobility. The local government provides a transportation service expenditure budget annually to pay for the transportation services they require. Theoretically, the subsidy benefits the poor, although a study on the evaluation of the transportation service subsidy program is still needed to ascertain whether the program beneficiaries benefit from the program. This study used a survey method, and it deepened by the in-depth interviews conducted with 98 respondents. It used to obtain supporting information to pair with the survey results. The critical findings from this study are that the subsidy program has increased the rate of savings in terms of transportation service spending, and it has also reduced the burden of food expenditure among the poor. Better access to education services among the program recipient students reduced traffic congestion, and the enthusiasm for learning within low-income family students are also benefits. Another benefit is that the public transport drivers involved in the program get sustainable income certainty. The income of the recipient community groups has increased moderately compared to the non-recipient groups. However, saving on transportation spending does not contribute significantly to the burden of food expenditure for low-income families. The reason for this is that the free transportation subsidies received by the poor are minimal in terms of the frequency of coupon use. This study concludes that free transport subsidies in the short term can alleviate the burden on the poor, and in the long run, they can improve the welfare of the poor.