Suchergebnisse

Acknowledgments -- Contents -- Chapter 1: Indigenous Women's Movements: An Intersectional Approach to Studying Social Movements -- 1 Indigenous Movements in Latin America -- 2 Indigenous Women and Gender Dynamics in Indigenous Movements -- 3 How We Study Indigenous Women's Mobilization -- 3.1 An Intersectional Analysis of Social Movements -- 3.2 Explaining the Emergence of Indigenous Women's Movements -- 3.2.1 Opening/Closing of Social Movements to Indigenous Women's Discourse -- 3.2.2 Boundary-Making Within Gender-Mixed Organizations -- 3.2.3 Ethnicity, Class, and Gender in Movement Identity -- 3.2.4 Role of External Actors -- 4 Our Case Comparison -- Notes -- References -- Part I: Bolivia -- Chapter 2: Indigenous Movements Merge into Party and State Politics -- 1 Race/Ethnicity in Twentieth-Century Bolivia -- 2 An Indigenous Party in Power -- 3 The Indigenous Movement -- 4 Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- Chapter 3: Indigenous Women Transform the Politics of Representing Women -- 1 Women's Organizing Through Different Processes and Collective Identities -- 1.1 The Confederación Nacional De Mujeres Campesinas Indígenas Originarias De Bolivia "Bartolina Sisa" -- 1.2 Confederación Sindical De Mujeres De Comunidades Interculturales De Bolivia -- 1.3 The Confederación Nacional De Mujeres Indígenas De Bolivia -- 1.4 Consejo Nacional De Ayllus y Markas Del Qullasuyu -- 2 The Agency of Organized Indigenous Women -- 2.1 Gains and Victories -- 2.2 Tensions and Conflicts -- 3 Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- Part II: Mexico -- Chapter 4: Indigenous Self-Determination: From National Dialogues to Local Autonomies -- 1 Race/Ethnicity in the Twentieth-Century Mexico -- 1.1 Mestizaje and Indigenismo -- 1.2 Neoliberal Reforms, Popular Discontent, and Intermediation Channels -- 2 The Contemporary Indigenous Movement -- 2.1 The Zapatista Movement

Populism and antigender politics in Peru: From civil society to electoral spherePopular support to antigender politics that emerged in the last years in several countries of Latin America has been explained mostly in terms of the entry of religious actors in the political system. Based on an analysis of antigender activists' and politicians' discourse in Peru, it is argued that building political representation vehicles around the rejection of the concept of gender constitutes a new expression of populism in Latin America. The new populisms use gender as a central concept in their discursive strategy. In Peru, the trajectory of antigender politics shows its origins in civil organizations and a rapid entry into the electoral sphere. The construction of populisms centred on value conflicts shows the need to widen the analytical framework on antigender politics beyond the relationship between religion and politics. El apoyo popular que la política antigénero ha conseguido en los últimos años en varios países de América Latina ha sido explicado sobre todo en referencia al ingreso de actores religiosos en el sistema político. En base a un análisis del discurso de activistas y políticos antigénero en Perú, se argumenta que la construcción de canales de representación política articulados alrededor del rechazo al concepto de género constituye una nueva expresión del populismo en Latinoamérica. Estos populismos utilizan el género de forma central en su estrategia discursiva de movilización. En Perú, la trayectoria de la política antigénero muestra su origen en organizaciones civiles y su ingreso rápido a la esfera electoral. La construcción de populismos centrados en conflictos de valores evidencia la necesidad de ampliar el marco de análisis de la política antigénero más allá de la relación entre religión y política.

In Peru, the adoption of a new school curriculum based on gender equality and nondiscrimination against sexual minorities led to the mobilization in 2016 of organizations connected to conservative churches under the slogan Con Mis Hijos No Te Metas (Don't Mess with My Children). This new countermovement uses street protests, the courts, and Congress to disseminate an antigender agenda that goes beyond its initial opposition to sexual education. Organizations in the countermovement consider the concept of gender to be a dangerous imperialist ideology, arguing that the state violates individual freedoms when it uses gender as one of the pillars of public policy.

Cette étude du cas de la Bolivie illustre les différentes dimensions d'un modèle d'étude intersectionnelle des mouvements sociaux présenté dans la première partie de cet article. Le modèle met en relief la structure intersectionnelle des rapports sociaux de genre et d'ethnicité racialisée, les différents niveaux de la politique de l'appartenance qu'il faut considérer pour mieux saisir la notion d'identité collective, et l'interaction entre mouvements sociaux au sein du processus politique comme étant trois variables expliquant la formation et la transformation des frontières identitaires dans une formation sociale donnée.