A primer for the Environmental Impact Assessment of mining at seafloor massive sulfide deposits
In: Marine policy, Band 42, S. 198-209
ISSN: 0308-597X
11 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Marine policy, Band 42, S. 198-209
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Marine policy: the international journal of ocean affairs, Band 42, S. 198-209
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Vare , L , Baker , M , Howe , J , Levin , L , Neira , C , Ramirez-Llodra , E , Reichelt-Brushett , A , Rowden , A , Shimmield , T , Simpson , S L & Soto , E H 2018 , ' Scientific considerations for the assessment and management of mine tailing disposal in the deep sea ' , Frontiers in Marine Science , pp. 2-33 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00017
Deep-sea tailing disposal (DSTD) and its shallow water counterpart, submarine tailings disposal (STD), are practiced in many areas of the world, whereby mining industries discharge processed mud- and rock waste slurries (tailings) directly into the marine environment. Pipeline discharges and other land-based sources of marine pollution fall beyond the regulatory scope of the London Convention and the London Protocols (LC/LP). However, guidelines have been developed (Papua New Guinea) to improve tailing waste management frameworks in which mining companies can operate. DSTD can impact ocean ecosystems in addition to other sources of stress, such as from fishing, pollution, energy extraction, tourism, eutrophication, climate change and, potentially in the future, from deep-seabed mining. Environmental management of DSTD may be most effective when placed in a broader context, drawing expertise, data and lessons from multiple sectors (academia, government, society, industry and regulators) and engaging with international deep-ocean observing programs, databases and stewardship consortia. Here, the challenges associated with DSTD are identified, along with possible solutions, based on the results of a number of robust scientific studies. Also highlighted are the key issues, trends of improved practice and techniques that could be used if considering DSTD and research needed to address current knowledge gaps are documented.
BASE
Deep-sea tailings disposal (DSTD) and its shallow water counterpart, submarine tailings disposal (STD), are practiced in many areas of the world, whereby mining industries discharge processed mud- and rock-waste slurries (tailings) directly into the marine environment. Pipeline discharges and other land-based sources of marine pollution fall beyond the regulatory scope of the London Convention and the London Protocols (LC/LP). However, guidelines have been developed in Papua New Guinea (PNG) to improve tailings waste management frameworks in which mining companies can operate. DSTD can impact ocean ecosystems in addition to other sources of stress, such as from fishing, pollution, energy extraction, tourism, eutrophication, climate change and, potentially in the future, from deep-seabed mining. Environmental management of DSTD may be most effective when placed in a broader context, drawing expertise, data and lessons from multiple sectors (academia, government, society, industry, and regulators) and engaging with international deep-ocean observing programs, databases and stewardship consortia. Here, the challenges associated with DSTD are identified, along with possible solutions, based on the results of a number of robust scientific studies. Also highlighted are the key issues, trends of improved practice and techniques that could be used if considering DSTD (such as increased precaution if considering submarine canyon locations), likely cumulative impacts, and research needed to address current knowledge gaps. ; publishedVersion
BASE
Deep-sea tailings disposal (DSTD) and its shallow water counterpart, submarine tailings disposal (STD), are practiced in many areas of the world, whereby mining industries discharge processed mud- and rock-waste slurries (tailings) directly into the marine environment. Pipeline discharges and other land-based sources of marine pollution fall beyond the regulatory scope of the London Convention and the London Protocols (LC/LP). However, guidelines have been developed in Papua New Guinea (PNG) to improve tailings waste management frameworks in which mining companies can operate. DSTD can impact ocean ecosystems in addition to other sources of stress, such as from fishing, pollution, energy extraction, tourism, eutrophication, climate change and, potentially in the future, from deep-seabed mining. Environmental management of DSTD may be most effective when placed in a broader context, drawing expertise, data and lessons from multiple sectors (academia, government, society, industry, and regulators) and engaging with international deep-ocean observing programs, databases and stewardship consortia. Here, the challenges associated with DSTD are identified, along with possible solutions, based on the results of a number of robust scientific studies. Also highlighted are the key issues, trends of improved practice and techniques that could be used if considering DSTD (such as increased precaution if considering submarine canyon locations), likely cumulative impacts, and research needed to address current knowledge gaps.
BASE
In: Marine policy: the international journal of ocean affairs, Band 49, S. 146-154
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Marine policy, Band 49, S. 146-154
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: JEMA-D-23-06101
SSRN
In: Marine policy, Band 74, S. 245-259
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Marine policy: the international journal of ocean affairs, Band 74, S. 245-259
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 12-29
ISSN: 1432-1009